Lussana Federico, Caprioli Chiara, Stefanoni Paola, Pavoni Chiara, Spinelli Orietta, Buklijas Ksenija, Michelato Anna, Borleri GianMaria, Algarotti Alessandra, Micò Caterina, Grassi Anna, Intermesoli Tamara, Rambaldi Alessandro
Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplant Unit, Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale Papa Giovanni XXIII, 24127 Bergamo, Italy.
Department of Oncology and Hematology, Universita' degli Studi di Milano, 20122 Milano, Italy.
Cancers (Basel). 2019 Sep 28;11(10):1455. doi: 10.3390/cancers11101455.
We analyzed the impact of alloHSCT in a single center cohort of 89 newly diagnosed AML patients, consecutively treated according to the Northern Italy Leukemia Group protocol 02/06 [NCT00495287]. After two consolidation cycles, the detection of measurable residual disease (MRD) by RQ-PCR was strongly associated with an inferior three-year overall survival (OS, 45% versus 84%, = 0.001) and disease-free survival (DFS, 44% versus 76%, = 0.006). In MRD-negative patients, post-remissional consolidation with alloHSCT did not provide a significant additional benefit over a conventional chemotherapy in terms of overall survival [OS, 89% (95% CI 71-100%) versus 81% (95% CI 64-100%), = 0.59] and disease-free survival [DFS, 80% (95% CI 59-100%) versus 75% (95% CI 56-99%), = 0.87]. On the contrary, in patients with persistent MRD positivity, the three-year OS and DFS were improved in patients receiving an alloHSCT compared to those allocated to conventional chemotherapy (OS, 52% versus 31%, = 0.45 and DFS, 50% versus 17%, = 0.31, respectively). However, in this group of patients, the benefit of alloHSCT was still hampered by a high incidence of leukemia relapse during the first year after transplantation (43%, 95% CI 25-60%). Consolidative alloHSCT improves outcomes compared to standard chemotherapy in patients with persistent MRD positivity, but in these high-risk patients, the significant incidence of leukemia relapse must be tackled by post-transplant preemptive treatments.
我们分析了异基因造血干细胞移植(alloHSCT)对89例新诊断急性髓系白血病(AML)患者单中心队列的影响,这些患者按照意大利北部白血病研究组02/06方案[临床试验注册号NCT00495287]进行连续治疗。经过两个巩固周期后,通过定量聚合酶链反应(RQ-PCR)检测到的可测量残留病(MRD)与较差的三年总生存期(OS,45%对84%,P = 0.001)和无病生存期(DFS,44%对76%,P = 0.006)密切相关。在MRD阴性的患者中,缓解后进行alloHSCT巩固治疗在总生存期[OS,89%(95%可信区间71 - 100%)对81%(95%可信区间64 - 100%),P = 0.59]和无病生存期[DFS,80%(95%可信区间59 - 100%)对75%(95%可信区间56 - 99%),P = 0.87]方面,相较于传统化疗并未提供显著的额外益处。相反,在持续MRD阳性的患者中,接受alloHSCT的患者三年OS和DFS相较于接受传统化疗的患者有所改善(OS分别为52%对31%,P = 0.45;DFS分别为50%对17%,P = 0.31)。然而,在这组患者中,alloHSCT的益处仍受到移植后第一年白血病高复发率(43%,95%可信区间25 - 60%)的阻碍。与标准化疗相比,巩固性alloHSCT可改善持续MRD阳性患者的预后,但在这些高危患者中,白血病的高复发率必须通过移植后抢先治疗来解决。