Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Van der Boechorststraat 7, NL-1081 BT Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Centre for Environmental Security and Safety, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), 3720 BA Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Sep 27;16(19):3625. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16193625.
The presence of intensive livestock farms in close vicinity to residential areas in the Netherlands is a complex problem characterised by knowledge uncertainty about the effects on residential health, overlapping value-driven concerns and stakeholder diversity. In order to address concerns about the health effects and effectively manage the debate about intensive livestock farming, constructive stakeholder dialogues are encouraged, informed by current scientific insights. We explored the current knowledge, beliefs and concerns of scientific experts, following the mental models approach. A summary expert model was derived from scanning the relevant literature and informed by interviews with 20 scientific experts. The study shows imprecise use of terminology by experts. Moreover, they appear to perceive intensive livestock farming not as a major health problem at least at this moment for neighbouring residents in the Netherlands. Broader themes such as (environmental) unsustainability and biodiversity loss seem a more prominent concern among the experts. Our study questions whether dialogues should only focus on residential health or cover broader values and concerns. However, mental models about risk may differ with other stakeholders, impeding communication. Hence, we will identify other stakeholders' knowledge, beliefs and value-based concerns in the light of facilitating constructed dialogues between stakeholders.
荷兰居民区附近存在密集型养殖场是一个复杂的问题,其特点是对居住健康影响的知识不确定性、利益相关者的多样性以及价值驱动的关注点重叠。为了解决人们对健康影响的担忧,并有效管理关于密集型畜牧业的辩论,我们鼓励进行建设性的利益相关者对话,这些对话以当前的科学见解为依据。我们采用心理模型方法,研究了科学专家的现有知识、信念和关注点。从扫描相关文献中得出了一个总结性的专家模型,并通过与 20 名科学专家的访谈得到了补充。研究表明,专家对术语的使用不够精确。此外,他们似乎认为,至少就目前而言,密集型畜牧业对荷兰当地居民来说并不是一个主要的健康问题。在这些专家看来,(环境)不可持续性和生物多样性丧失等更广泛的主题似乎更为突出。我们的研究质疑对话是否只应关注居住健康,还是应涵盖更广泛的价值观和关注点。然而,风险的心理模型可能因其他利益相关者而异,从而阻碍了沟通。因此,我们将根据促进利益相关者之间的建设性对话,确定其他利益相关者的知识、信念和基于价值观的关注点。