Kidney Research Institute, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Health Services Research and Development Center, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA; Division of Nephrology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
Division of Nephrology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
Am J Kidney Dis. 2020 Feb;75(2):167-176. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2019.07.006. Epub 2019 Sep 27.
RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE: It is relatively unusual for US patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) to forgo initiation of maintenance dialysis. Our objective was to describe practice approaches of US nephrologists who have provided conservative care for members of this population.
Qualitative study using semi-structured interviews.
SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: A national sample of 21 nephrologists experienced in caring for patients with advanced CKD who decided not to start dialysis.
Grounded theory methods to identify dominant themes reflecting nephrologists' experiences with and approaches to conservative care for patients with advanced CKD.
Nephrologists who participated in this study were primarily from academic practices (n=14) and urban areas (n=15). Two prominent themes emerged from qualitative analysis reflecting nephrologists' experiences with and approaches to conservative care: (1) person-centered practices, which described a holistic approach to care that included basing treatment decisions on what mattered most to individual patients, framing dialysis as an explicit choice, being mindful of sources of bias in medical decision making, and being flexible to the changing needs, values, and preferences of patients; and (2) improvising a care infrastructure, which described the challenges of managing patients conservatively within health systems that are not optimally configured to support their needs. Participating nephrologists described cobbling together resources, assuming a range of different health care roles, preparing patients to navigate health systems in which initiation of dialysis served as a powerful default, and championing the principles of conservative care among their colleagues.
The themes identified likely are not generalizable to most US nephrologists.
Insights from a select group of US nephrologists who are early adopters of conservative care signal the need for a stronger cultural and health system commitment to building care models capable of supporting patients who choose to forgo dialysis.
在美国,患有晚期慢性肾脏病(CKD)的患者通常不会选择放弃开始维持性透析。本研究旨在描述为该人群提供保守治疗的美国肾病学家的实践方法。
采用半结构式访谈的定性研究。
一项全国性的样本研究,包括 21 名有丰富治疗晚期 CKD 患者经验且决定不开始透析的肾病学家。
采用扎根理论方法识别反映肾病学家对晚期 CKD 患者保守治疗的经验和方法的主要主题。
参与本研究的肾病学家主要来自学术实践(n=14)和城市地区(n=15)。定性分析得出两个突出的主题,反映了肾病学家对保守治疗的经验和方法:(1)以患者为中心的实践,描述了一种整体的治疗方法,包括根据患者的个人需求做出治疗决策,将透析作为一种明确的选择,注意医疗决策中的偏见来源,并灵活应对患者需求、价值观和偏好的变化;(2)制定护理基础设施,描述了在优化配置以满足其需求的卫生系统中,保守治疗患者所面临的挑战。参与研究的肾病学家描述了拼凑资源、承担多种不同的医疗保健角色、使患者准备好在以启动透析为默认选项的卫生系统中进行导航、以及在同行中倡导保守治疗原则的情况。
确定的主题可能不适用于大多数美国肾病学家。
从早期采用保守治疗的美国肾病学家中得出的见解表明,需要更强的文化和卫生系统承诺,以建立能够支持选择不进行透析的患者的护理模式。