Suppr超能文献

结直肠癌和阑尾腹膜转移患者行 CRS 和 HIPEC 治疗前 BRAF 和 KRAS 基因突变的预后影响。

Prognostic Impact of BRAF and KRAS Mutation in Patients with Colorectal and Appendiceal Peritoneal Metastases Scheduled for CRS and HIPEC.

机构信息

Department of Surgical Sciences, Akademiska sjukhuset, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.

Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Clinical and Experimental Pathology, Akademiska sjukhuset, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.

出版信息

Ann Surg Oncol. 2020 Jan;27(1):293-300. doi: 10.1245/s10434-019-07452-2. Epub 2019 Sep 30.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

KRAS and BRAF mutations are prognostic and predictive tools in metastatic colorectal cancer, but little is known about their prognostic value in patients scheduled for cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). Therefore, we analyzed the prognostic impact of KRAS and BRAF mutations in patients with peritoneal metastases scheduled for CRS and HIPEC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In a consecutive series of 399 patients scheduled for CRS and HIPEC between 2009 and 2017, 111 subjects with peritoneal metastases from primaries of the appendix, colon, or rectum were analyzed for KRAS mutation and 92 for BRAF mutation.

RESULTS

Mutation in KRAS was present in 51/111 (46%), and mutated BRAF was found in 10/92 (11%). There was no difference in overall survival between KRAS mutation tumors and KRAS wild type, whereas BRAF mutation was associated with short survival. No subject with BRAF mutation survived 2 years. On multivariate analysis, completeness of cytoreduction score (CCS, p = 0.000001), presence of signet cell differentiation (p = 0.000001), and BRAF mutation (p = 0.0021) were linked with poor prognosis.

CONCLUSIONS

BRAF mutation is a marker of poor prognosis in patients with appendiceal and colorectal peritoneal metastases scheduled for CRS and HIPEC, whereas survival outcome in subjects with mutated KRAS does not differ from wild-type KRAS. This finding suggests that those with BRAF mutation should be considered for alternative treatment options.

摘要

背景

KRAS 和 BRAF 突变是转移性结直肠癌的预后和预测工具,但对于它们在计划接受细胞减灭术(CRS)和腹腔热灌注化疗(HIPEC)的患者中的预后价值知之甚少。因此,我们分析了 KRAS 和 BRAF 突变对计划接受 CRS 和 HIPEC 的腹膜转移患者的预后影响。

患者和方法

在 2009 年至 2017 年间连续系列的 399 例接受 CRS 和 HIPEC 的患者中,对 111 例来自阑尾、结肠或直肠原发肿瘤的腹膜转移患者进行了 KRAS 突变分析,92 例进行了 BRAF 突变分析。

结果

在 111 例中有 51 例(46%)存在 KRAS 突变,92 例中有 10 例(11%)存在 BRAF 突变。KRAS 突变肿瘤与 KRAS 野生型患者的总生存率无差异,而 BRAF 突变与短生存期相关。无 BRAF 突变患者存活 2 年。多因素分析显示,细胞减灭术完全程度评分(CCS,p=0.000001)、存在印戒细胞分化(p=0.000001)和 BRAF 突变(p=0.0021)与预后不良相关。

结论

BRAF 突变是计划接受 CRS 和 HIPEC 的阑尾和结直肠腹膜转移患者预后不良的标志物,而 KRAS 突变患者的生存结果与 KRAS 野生型无差异。这一发现表明,BRAF 突变患者应考虑替代治疗方案。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c19b/6925063/ea154b60880a/10434_2019_7452_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验