Bruno Valentina, Carpinella Ilaria, Rabuffetti Marco, De Giuli Lorenzo, Sinigaglia Corrado, Garbarini Francesca, Ferrarin Maurizio
MANIBUS Laboratory, Psychology Department, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi, Biomedical Technology Department, Milan, Italy.
Front Hum Neurosci. 2019 Sep 12;13:299. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2019.00299. eCollection 2019.
Previous evidence has shown that tool-use can reshape one's own body schema, extending peripersonal space and modulating the representation of related body parts. Here, we investigated the role of tool action in shaping the body metric representation, by contrasting two different views. According to a first view, the shaping would rely on the mere execution of tool action, while the second view suggests that the shaping induced by tool action on body representation would primarily depend on the representation of the action goals to be accomplished. To this aim, we contrasted a condition in which participants voluntarily accomplish the movement by representing the program and goal of a tool action (i.e., active tool-use training) with a condition in which the tool-use training was produced without any prior goal representation (i.e., passive tool-use training by means of robotic assistance). If the body metric representation primarily depends on the coexistence between goal representation and bodily movements, we would expect an increase of the perceived forearm length in the post- with respect to the pre-training phase after the active training phase only. Healthy participants were asked to estimate the midpoint of their right forearm before and after 20 min of tool-use training. In the active condition, subjects performed "enfold-and-push" movements using a rake to prolong their arm. In the passive condition, subjects were asked to be completely relaxed while the movements were performed with robotic assistance. Results showed a significant increase in the perceived arm length in the post- with respect to the pre-training phase only in the active task. Interestingly, only in the post-training phase, a significant difference was found between active and passive conditions, with a higher perceived arm length in the former than in the latter. From a theoretical perspective, these findings suggest that tool-use may shape body metric representation only when action programs are motorically represented and not merely produced. From a clinical perspective, these results support the use of robots for the rehabilitation of brain-damaged hemiplegic patients, provided that robot assistance during the exercises is present only "as-needed" and that patients' motor representation is actively involved.
先前的证据表明,工具使用能够重塑自身的身体图式,扩展个人周边空间,并调节相关身体部位的表征。在此,我们通过对比两种不同观点,研究了工具动作在塑造身体度量表征中的作用。根据第一种观点,这种塑造将依赖于工具动作的单纯执行,而第二种观点则表明,工具动作对身体表征的塑造主要取决于要实现的动作目标的表征。为了实现这一目标,我们将参与者通过表征工具动作的程序和目标来自愿完成动作的条件(即主动工具使用训练)与工具使用训练在没有任何先前目标表征的情况下进行的条件(即通过机器人辅助进行被动工具使用训练)进行了对比。如果身体度量表征主要取决于目标表征与身体动作之间的共存,那么我们预计只有在主动训练阶段之后,相对于训练前阶段,训练后感知到的前臂长度才会增加。我们要求健康参与者在进行20分钟工具使用训练前后估计其右前臂的中点。在主动条件下,受试者使用耙子进行“折叠和推”动作以延长手臂。在被动条件下,受试者被要求完全放松,同时由机器人辅助进行动作。结果显示,只有在主动任务中,相对于训练前阶段,训练后感知到的手臂长度有显著增加。有趣的是,只有在训练后阶段,才发现主动和被动条件之间存在显著差异,前者感知到的手臂长度高于后者。从理论角度来看,这些发现表明,只有当动作程序在运动上被表征而不仅仅是被执行时,工具使用才可能塑造身体度量表征。从临床角度来看,这些结果支持使用机器人对脑损伤偏瘫患者进行康复治疗,前提是在训练过程中机器人辅助仅“按需”提供,并且患者的运动表征积极参与其中。