• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医学复杂新生儿非选择性中心静脉导管拔除的预测

Prediction of Nonelective Central Venous Catheter Removal in Medically Complex Neonates.

作者信息

Beard Lauren, Levek Claire, Hwang Sunah, Grover Theresa

机构信息

Section of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colo.

出版信息

Pediatr Qual Saf. 2019 Aug 5;4(4):e179. doi: 10.1097/pq9.0000000000000179. eCollection 2019 Jul-Aug.

DOI:10.1097/pq9.0000000000000179
PMID:31572882
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6708650/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Central venous catheters (CVCs) are essential to neonatal care but associated with significant morbidity. Nonelective CVC removal (NER) is an inadequately studied outcome associated with increased morbidity, infant and family stress, and cost. This study describes prevalence and predictors of NER in infants admitted to a level IV neonatal intensive care unit and NER variation between peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs), cutdown PICCs, and surgical CVCs.

METHODS

In this study, we include patient and catheter data for infants admitted to a level IV neonatal intensive care unit (2010-2015). Demographic and clinical characteristics were compared using 1-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), Kruskal-Wallis, and chi-square tests for continuous, non-normally distributed continuous, and categorical variables, respectively. The association between NER due to complication and infant and catheter characteristics was assessed using generalized linear mixed models.

RESULTS

Patient and catheter characteristics vary significantly by catheter type. The overall rate of NER is 15% (17% PICCs, 13% cutdown PICCs, and 19% surgical CVCs). The most common indications for NER are catheter breakage, blood stream infection(BSI)/central line-associated blood stream infection(CLABSI), catheter malposition, mechanical obstruction, and extravasation. Birth weight, patient diagnosis, catheter dwell time, and concurrent catheters are associated with increased odds of NER.

CONCLUSIONS

Patient risk factors and potentially modifiable catheter characteristics, including catheter dwell time and concurrent catheters, are associated with increased NER. As NER is associated with a broad spectrum of adverse outcomes, we propose a quality improvement strategy to risk stratify patients and reduce exposure to high-risk, modifiable catheter characteristics.

摘要

引言

中心静脉导管(CVC)对新生儿护理至关重要,但会带来显著的发病率。非选择性CVC拔除(NER)是一个研究不足的结果,与发病率增加、婴儿及家庭压力和成本相关。本研究描述了入住四级新生儿重症监护病房的婴儿中NER的发生率和预测因素,以及外周插入中心静脉导管(PICC)、切开式PICC和外科CVC之间的NER差异。

方法

在本研究中,我们纳入了入住四级新生儿重症监护病房(2010 - 2015年)的婴儿的患者和导管数据。分别使用单因素方差分析(ANOVA)、Kruskal - Wallis检验和卡方检验对连续变量、非正态分布连续变量和分类变量的人口统计学和临床特征进行比较。使用广义线性混合模型评估因并发症导致的NER与婴儿及导管特征之间的关联。

结果

患者和导管特征因导管类型而异。NER的总体发生率为15%(PICC为17%,切开式PICC为13%,外科CVC为19%)。NER最常见的指征是导管破裂、血流感染(BSI)/中心静脉导管相关血流感染(CLABSI)、导管位置不当、机械性阻塞和外渗。出生体重、患者诊断、导管留置时间和同时存在的导管与NER几率增加相关。

结论

患者风险因素以及包括导管留置时间和同时存在的导管在内的潜在可改变的导管特征与NER增加相关。由于NER与广泛的不良后果相关,我们提出一种质量改进策略,对患者进行风险分层,并减少暴露于高风险、可改变的导管特征。

相似文献

1
Prediction of Nonelective Central Venous Catheter Removal in Medically Complex Neonates.医学复杂新生儿非选择性中心静脉导管拔除的预测
Pediatr Qual Saf. 2019 Aug 5;4(4):e179. doi: 10.1097/pq9.0000000000000179. eCollection 2019 Jul-Aug.
2
Peripherally inserted central catheters are associated with lower risk of bloodstream infection compared with central venous catheters in paediatric intensive care patients: a propensity-adjusted analysis.外周置入中心静脉导管与中心静脉导管相比,与儿科重症监护患者的血流感染风险较低:一项倾向调整分析。
Intensive Care Med. 2017 Aug;43(8):1097-1104. doi: 10.1007/s00134-017-4852-7. Epub 2017 Jun 5.
3
Peripherally inserted central catheters may lower the incidence of catheter-related blood stream infections in patients in surgical intensive care units.外周置入中心静脉导管可能会降低外科重症监护病房患者的导管相关血流感染发生率。
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2011 Aug;12(4):279-82. doi: 10.1089/sur.2008.058. Epub 2010 Jul 14.
4
The idle central venous catheter in the NICU: When should it be removed?新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)中的闲置中心静脉导管:何时应予以拔除?
J Pediatr Surg. 2018 Jul;53(7):1414-1416. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2017.10.060. Epub 2017 Nov 9.
5
Peripherally inserted central venous catheters in the acute care setting: A safe alternative to high-risk short-term central venous catheters.在急性护理环境中使用外周置入中心静脉导管:一种替代高风险短期中心静脉导管的安全选择。
Am J Infect Control. 2010 Mar;38(2):149-53. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2009.06.008.
6
The risk of bloodstream infection associated with peripherally inserted central catheters compared with central venous catheters in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.成人外周静脉置入中心静脉导管与中心静脉导管相关血流感染风险的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2013 Sep;34(9):908-18. doi: 10.1086/671737. Epub 2013 Jul 26.
7
Peripherally inserted central catheter complications in neonates with upper versus lower extremity insertion sites.上肢与下肢穿刺部位的新生儿经外周静脉穿刺中心静脉置管并发症
Adv Neonatal Care. 2013 Jun;13(3):198-204. doi: 10.1097/ANC.0b013e31827e1d01.
8
Catheter dwell time and CLABSIs in neonates with PICCs: a multicenter cohort study.经外周静脉置入中心静脉导管(PICC)新生儿的导管留置时间与 CLABSIs:一项多中心队列研究。
Pediatrics. 2013 Dec;132(6):e1609-15. doi: 10.1542/peds.2013-1645. Epub 2013 Nov 11.
9
Peripherally inserted central catheters have a protective role and the effect of fluctuation curve feature in the risk of bloodstream infection compared with central venous catheters: a propensity-adjusted analysis.与中心静脉导管相比,外周置入中心静脉导管具有保护作用和波动曲线特征对血流感染风险的影响:倾向评分调整分析。
BMC Infect Dis. 2022 Mar 26;22(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s12879-022-07265-x.
10
Are cuffed peripherally inserted central catheters superior to uncuffed peripherally inserted central catheters? A retrospective review in a tertiary pediatric center.带囊外周静脉置入中心导管优于无囊外周静脉置入中心导管吗?三级儿科中心的回顾性研究。
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2013 Sep;24(9):1316-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2013.03.003. Epub 2013 May 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Umbilically and Peripherally Inserted Thin Central Venous Catheters Have Similar Risks of Complications in Very Low-Birth-Weight Infants.脐静脉和外周置入的中心静脉细导管在极低出生体重儿中的并发症风险相似。
Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2023 Nov;62(11):1361-1368. doi: 10.1177/00099228231161299. Epub 2023 Mar 21.
2
Central-line-associated bloodstream infections and central-line-associated non-CLABSI complications among pediatric oncology patients.儿科肿瘤患者的中心静脉导管相关血流感染和中心静脉导管相关非 CLABSI 并发症。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2023 Mar;44(3):377-383. doi: 10.1017/ice.2022.91. Epub 2022 Apr 27.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Tunnelled central venous access devices in small children: A comparison of open vs. ultrasound-guided percutaneous insertion in children weighing ten kilograms or less.低体重幼儿经隧道式中心静脉通路装置:10千克及以下儿童开放式与超声引导下经皮穿刺置入的比较
J Pediatr Surg. 2018 Sep;53(9):1832-1838. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2018.03.025. Epub 2018 Apr 5.
2
Antibiotics at the time of removal of central venous catheter to reduce morbidity and mortality in newborn infants.在拔除中心静脉导管时使用抗生素以降低新生儿的发病率和死亡率。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Mar 7;3(3):CD012181. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012181.pub2.
3
Effect of implementing an Epicutaneo-Caval Catheter team in Neonatal Intensive Care Unit.
在新生儿重症监护病房实施经皮腔内心导管团队的效果。
J Vasc Access. 2021 Mar;22(2):243-253. doi: 10.1177/1129729820928182. Epub 2020 Jun 30.
Dwell time and risk of central-line-associated bloodstream infection in neonates.
新生儿留置时间与中心静脉导管相关血流感染的风险。
J Hosp Infect. 2017 Nov;97(3):267-274. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2017.06.023. Epub 2017 Jun 23.
4
Dwell times and risk of non-elective removal of 1-French peripherally inserted central catheters according to catheter tip position in very preterm infants.根据极早产儿1法国规格外周静脉穿刺中心静脉导管的导管尖端位置,其留置时间及非选择性拔除的风险
Eur J Pediatr. 2017 Mar;176(3):407-411. doi: 10.1007/s00431-017-2854-7. Epub 2017 Jan 16.
5
Predictors of Nonelective Removal of Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters in Infants.婴儿外周静脉穿刺中心静脉导管非计划性拔除的预测因素
Biol Res Nurs. 2016 Mar;18(2):173-80. doi: 10.1177/1099800415590856. Epub 2015 Jul 1.
6
[Reasons for non-elective removal of epicutaneous catheters in neonates].[新生儿经皮导管非选择性拔除的原因]
Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2013 Dec;47(6):1279-84. doi: 10.1590/S0080-623420130000600004.
7
Peripherally inserted central venous catheters: frequency of complications in premature newborn depends on the insertion site.外周静脉穿刺中心静脉导管:早产儿并发症的发生率取决于穿刺部位。
J Perinatol. 2014 Jun;34(6):461-3. doi: 10.1038/jp.2014.36. Epub 2014 Mar 13.
8
The Children's Hospitals Neonatal Database: an overview of patient complexity, outcomes and variation in care.儿童医院新生儿数据库:患者复杂性、治疗结果及护理差异概述
J Perinatol. 2014 Aug;34(8):582-6. doi: 10.1038/jp.2014.26. Epub 2014 Mar 6.
9
Coagulase-negative staphylococcus sepsis in preterm infants and long-term neurodevelopmental outcome.凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌败血症与早产儿的长期神经发育结局。
J Perinatol. 2014 Feb;34(2):125-9. doi: 10.1038/jp.2013.155. Epub 2013 Dec 19.
10
Catheter dwell time and CLABSIs in neonates with PICCs: a multicenter cohort study.经外周静脉置入中心静脉导管(PICC)新生儿的导管留置时间与 CLABSIs:一项多中心队列研究。
Pediatrics. 2013 Dec;132(6):e1609-15. doi: 10.1542/peds.2013-1645. Epub 2013 Nov 11.