• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于中国辽宁省瓦房店市生态系统服务多情景分配与权衡的土地利用管理

Land use management based on multi-scenario allocation and trade-offs of ecosystem services in Wafangdian County, Liaoning Province, China.

作者信息

Zhao Wenzhen, Han Zenglin, Yan Xiaolu, Zhong Jingqiu

机构信息

Liaoning Normal University, Urban and Environmental college, Dalian, Liaoning Province, China.

Liaoning Normal University, Center for Studies of Marine Economy and Sustainable Development, Dalian, Liaoning Province, China.

出版信息

PeerJ. 2019 Sep 16;7:e7673. doi: 10.7717/peerj.7673. eCollection 2019.

DOI:10.7717/peerj.7673
PMID:31576239
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6752191/
Abstract

Developing effective methods to coordinate the trade-offs among ecosystem services (ES) is important for achieving inclusive growth and sustainable development, and has been the focus of scholars and ecosystem managers globally. Using remote sensing and geographic information system (GIS) data, our study examined Wafangdian County of Liaoning Province as a case study to reveal the spatiotemporal evolution of four ES (food supply [FS], net primary productivity [NPP], water yield [WY], and soil conservation [SC]) and changes among their interactions. Then, an ordered weighted averaging model was introduced to simulate the optimal scenario of ES allocation. Results showed that: (1) the spatial and temporal changes in ES were significant over 14 years. All ES presented an inverted U-shaped growth curve from 2000-2014. (2) Synergies were observed within provisioning services, and there were trade-offs between provisioning services and regulating services, as well as provisioning services and supporting services. (3) The optimal scenario for Wafangdian was scenario 5 (trade-off coefficient, 0.68). The allocation of FS, NPP, WY, and SC in scenario 5 were 0.187, 0.427, 0.131, and 0.063, respectively. Implementing each ES weight of optimal scenario in land use management contributed to achieving intercoordination of ES. We propose to coordinate land and sea management to restore natural habitats that were expanded into in the high ES area. It is our anticipation that this study could provide a scientific basis for optimizing the allocation of ES and improving land use structure of coastal zones in the future.

摘要

开发有效的方法来协调生态系统服务(ES)之间的权衡对于实现包容性增长和可持续发展至关重要,并且一直是全球学者和生态系统管理者关注的焦点。利用遥感和地理信息系统(GIS)数据,我们的研究以辽宁省瓦房店市为例进行考察,以揭示四种生态系统服务(食物供给[FS]、净初级生产力[NPP]、产水量[WY]和土壤保持[SC])的时空演变及其相互作用的变化。然后,引入有序加权平均模型来模拟生态系统服务分配的最优情景。结果表明:(1)14年间生态系统服务的时空变化显著。2000年至2014年,所有生态系统服务均呈现倒U形增长曲线。(2) 在供给服务内部观察到协同效应,在供给服务与调节服务以及供给服务与支持服务之间存在权衡。(3) 瓦房店的最优情景是情景5(权衡系数为0.68)。情景5中FS、NPP、WY和SC的分配分别为0.187、0.427、0.131和0.063。在土地利用管理中实施最优情景的每种生态系统服务权重有助于实现生态系统服务的相互协调。我们建议协调陆地和海洋管理,以恢复在高生态系统服务区域扩展的自然栖息地。我们预期这项研究能够为未来优化生态系统服务分配和改善沿海地区土地利用结构提供科学依据。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7546/6752191/12beb75dbd40/peerj-07-7673-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7546/6752191/2da24e6af201/peerj-07-7673-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7546/6752191/a002b715962f/peerj-07-7673-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7546/6752191/2261e2fc5ddf/peerj-07-7673-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7546/6752191/f1fe0d185ca4/peerj-07-7673-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7546/6752191/72fc487837cb/peerj-07-7673-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7546/6752191/0888a7592dbb/peerj-07-7673-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7546/6752191/cba2acb34c62/peerj-07-7673-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7546/6752191/12beb75dbd40/peerj-07-7673-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7546/6752191/2da24e6af201/peerj-07-7673-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7546/6752191/a002b715962f/peerj-07-7673-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7546/6752191/2261e2fc5ddf/peerj-07-7673-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7546/6752191/f1fe0d185ca4/peerj-07-7673-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7546/6752191/72fc487837cb/peerj-07-7673-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7546/6752191/0888a7592dbb/peerj-07-7673-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7546/6752191/cba2acb34c62/peerj-07-7673-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7546/6752191/12beb75dbd40/peerj-07-7673-g008.jpg

相似文献

1
Land use management based on multi-scenario allocation and trade-offs of ecosystem services in Wafangdian County, Liaoning Province, China.基于中国辽宁省瓦房店市生态系统服务多情景分配与权衡的土地利用管理
PeerJ. 2019 Sep 16;7:e7673. doi: 10.7717/peerj.7673. eCollection 2019.
2
Ecosystem services in conservation planning: Assessing compatible vs. incompatible conservation.保护规划中的生态系统服务:评估兼容与不兼容的保护。
J Environ Manage. 2022 Jun 15;312:114906. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.114906. Epub 2022 Apr 4.
3
Identifying ecosystem service bundles and the spatiotemporal characteristics of trade-offs and synergies in coal mining areas with a high groundwater table.识别生态系统服务包以及高地下水位采煤区权衡和协同作用的时空特征。
Sci Total Environ. 2022 Feb 10;807(Pt 3):151036. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.151036. Epub 2021 Oct 18.
4
Spatial heterogeneity and management challenges of ecosystem service trade-offs: a case study in Guangdong Province, China.生态系统服务权衡的空间异质性与管理挑战:以中国广东省为例。
Environ Manage. 2024 Feb;73(2):378-394. doi: 10.1007/s00267-023-01851-8. Epub 2023 Jun 26.
5
Spatial-Temporal Variations and Trade-Offs of Ecosystem Services in Anhui Province, China.中国安徽省生态系统服务的时空变化及其权衡关系。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 3;20(1):855. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20010855.
6
Simulating the Impact of Future Climate Change and Ecological Restoration on Trade-Offs and Synergies of Ecosystem Services in Two Ecological Shelters and Three Belts in China.模拟未来气候变化和生态恢复对中国两个生态保护区和三个生态带生态系统服务权衡与协同的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Oct 26;17(21):7849. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17217849.
7
Multiscale ecosystem service synergies/trade-offs and their driving mechanisms in the Han River Basin, China: implications for watershed management.中国汉江流域多尺度生态系统服务协同/权衡及其驱动机制:对流域管理的启示
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Mar;30(15):43440-43454. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-25248-6. Epub 2023 Jan 19.
8
Ecosystem services trade-offs and determinants in China's Yangtze River Economic Belt from 2000 to 2015.2000-2015 年中国长江经济带生态系统服务权衡与决定因素。
Sci Total Environ. 2018 Sep 1;634:1601-1614. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.04.046. Epub 2018 Apr 18.
9
Spatial and temporal effect and driving factors of ecosystem service trade-off in the Qingjiang River Basin, China.中国清江流域生态系统服务权衡的时空效应及驱动因素
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2023 Apr;34(4):1051-1062. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202304.022.
10
Integrating ecosystem services trade-offs with paddy land-to-dry land decisions: A scenario approach in Erhai Lake Basin, southwest China.将生态系统服务权衡与稻田到旱地决策相结合:以中国西南洱海流域为例的情景方法。
Sci Total Environ. 2018 Jun 1;625:849-860. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.12.340. Epub 2018 Jan 5.

本文引用的文献

1
Realizing the values of natural capital for inclusive, sustainable development: Informing China's new ecological development strategy.实现自然资本对于包容性、可持续发展的价值:为中国新的生态发展战略提供信息。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Apr 23;116(17):8623-8628. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1819501116. Epub 2019 Apr 5.
2
Tele-connecting China's future urban growth to impacts on ecosystem services under the shared socioeconomic pathways.远程连接中国未来城市增长与共享社会经济路径下生态系统服务的影响。
Sci Total Environ. 2019 Feb 20;652:765-779. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.283. Epub 2018 Oct 22.
3
Integrating supply, flow and demand to enhance the understanding of interactions among multiple ecosystem services.
整合供给、流动和需求,以增强对多种生态系统服务相互作用的理解。
Sci Total Environ. 2019 Feb 15;651(Pt 1):928-941. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.09.235. Epub 2018 Sep 19.
4
Understand the resilience and regime shift of the wetland ecosystem after human disturbances.了解人类干扰后湿地生态系统的恢复力和状态转移。
Sci Total Environ. 2018 Dec 1;643:1031-1040. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.06.276. Epub 2018 Jun 28.
5
Disturbance legacies increase the resilience of forest ecosystem structure, composition, and functioning.干扰遗留效应增强了森林生态系统结构、组成和功能的恢复力。
Ecol Appl. 2014 Dec 1;24(8):2063-2077. doi: 10.1890/14-0255.1.
6
Mapping bundles of ecosystem services reveals distinct types of multifunctionality within a Swedish landscape.绘制生态系统服务束揭示了瑞典景观中不同类型的多功能性。
Ambio. 2015 Jan;44 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S89-101. doi: 10.1007/s13280-014-0601-0.
7
Indirect human impacts turn off reciprocal feedbacks and decrease ecosystem resilience.人类的间接影响会切断相互反馈,降低生态系统的恢复力。
Oecologia. 2015 May;178(1):231-7. doi: 10.1007/s00442-014-3166-5. Epub 2014 Nov 29.
8
Linking ecosystem characteristics to final ecosystem services for public policy.将生态系统特征与最终生态系统服务联系起来,以制定公共政策。
Ecol Lett. 2015 Jan;18(1):108-18. doi: 10.1111/ele.12389. Epub 2014 Nov 14.
9
Ecosystem services and opportunity costs shift spatial priorities for conserving forest biodiversity.生态系统服务和机会成本改变了保护森林生物多样性的空间优先次序。
PLoS One. 2014 Nov 13;9(11):e112557. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0112557. eCollection 2014.
10
Typology and indicators of ecosystem services for marine spatial planning and management.海洋空间规划和管理的生态系统服务的类型学和指标。
J Environ Manage. 2013 Nov 30;130:135-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.08.027. Epub 2013 Sep 26.