辅助措施在种植体周围炎非手术治疗中的疗效:系统评价。

Efficacy of adjunctive measures in the non-surgical treatment of peri-implantitis: A systematic review.

机构信息

Periodontology Unit, Faculty of Odontology, University of Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.

Medical-Surgical Dentistry Research Group, Health Research Institute of Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.

出版信息

J Clin Periodontol. 2023 Jun;50 Suppl 26:224-243. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.13821. Epub 2023 May 4.

Abstract

AIM

The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the efficacy of patient-performed or administered adjunctive measures to non-surgical peri-implantitis therapy in terms of probing depth (PD) and/or bleeding on probing (BoP) reductions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Randomized and controlled clinical trials with at least 6 months of follow-up were searched in three databases. Secondary outcomes included implant loss, disease resolution, recurrence of peri-implantitis, need of re-treatment, changes in marginal bone levels, patient-reported outcomes and adverse effects.

RESULTS

Of 567 titles, 10 publications, reporting 9 investigations, were included. Three types of adjunctive measures were found (local/systemic antimicrobials and probiotics). Four studies evaluated the effects of local antimicrobials (i.e., minocycline microspheres, chlorhexidine chips or a metronidazole + amoxicillin gel), three studies evaluated systemic antimicrobials (either amoxicillin + metronidazole or metronidazole alone) and two studies evaluated probiotics (Lactobacillus reuteri strains). The addition of local antimicrobials led to modest improvements in PD reduction. Systemic antimicrobials showed significantly greater reductions in PD and BoP, especially at initially deep sites (PD > 6 mm). Due to the large heterogeneity among included studies, no meta-analyses were performed.

CONCLUSIONS

Different adjunctive measures in the non-surgical treatment of peri-implantitis have different impact in terms of PD and BoP reductions. Improved PD reductions result after the use of systemic antimicrobials, and to a lesser extent, after the use of local antimicrobials.

摘要

目的

本系统评价的目的是评估患者执行或辅助非手术性种植体周围炎治疗的附加措施在探诊深度(PD)和/或探诊出血(BoP)减少方面的疗效。

材料和方法

在三个数据库中搜索了至少 6 个月随访的随机对照临床试验。次要结局包括种植体丧失、疾病缓解、种植体周围炎复发、需要再次治疗、边缘骨水平变化、患者报告的结果和不良反应。

结果

在 567 篇标题中,有 10 篇文献,报道了 9 项研究,被纳入研究。发现了三种附加措施(局部/全身抗菌药物和益生菌)。四项研究评估了局部抗菌药物(即米诺环素微球、洗必泰片或甲硝唑+阿莫西林凝胶)的效果,三项研究评估了全身抗菌药物(阿莫西林+甲硝唑或单独甲硝唑)的效果,两项研究评估了益生菌(罗伊氏乳杆菌菌株)的效果。局部抗菌药物的添加导致 PD 减少的适度改善。全身抗菌药物在 PD 和 BoP 的减少方面显示出显著更大的效果,特别是在最初深度的部位(PD>6mm)。由于纳入研究之间存在很大的异质性,因此没有进行荟萃分析。

结论

在种植体周围炎的非手术治疗中,不同的附加措施在 PD 和 BoP 减少方面有不同的影响。使用全身抗菌药物后,PD 减少得到改善,而使用局部抗菌药物后,PD 减少的程度较小。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索