• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经皮电神经刺激仪介导的高电压脉冲射频术治疗慢性腰骶神经根性疼痛的随机对照研究。

Electrocatheter-mediated High-voltage Pulsed Radiofrequency of the Dorsal Root Ganglion in the Treatment of Chronic Lumbosacral Neuropathic Pain: A Randomized Controlled Study.

机构信息

Santa Maria Maddalena Hospital, Pain Medicine Unit, Occhiobello.

Department of Experimental Biomedicine and Clinical Neurosciences (BioNeC), University of Palermo, Palermo.

出版信息

Clin J Pain. 2020 Jan;36(1):25-33. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000766.

DOI:10.1097/AJP.0000000000000766
PMID:31577546
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6903354/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Despite the interest in scientific community, there is still poor evidence about pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) efficacy in the treatment of neuropathic pain. In order to determine whether high-voltage PRF and epidural adhesiolysis (PRF-EA) showed better results than epidural adhesiolysis alone (EA), a randomized, double-blind, comparative-effectiveness study was conducted in patients with chronic lumbosacral radiating pain and neuropathic features.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 41 patients were randomly allocated to 2 groups. Twenty-one patients were randomized to receive 2 cycles of 240 seconds high-voltage PRF followed by the injection of local anesthetics, hyaluronidase, and betamethasone, whereas 20 patients underwent sham stimulation followed by adhesiolysis. The treatment was delivered at the affected lumbosacral roots and patients, treating physicians and assessors were blinded to intervention.

RESULTS

A significant reduction of radiating pain was observed in mean Numeric Rating Scale score at follow-up. A change of -3.43 versus -1.75 (P=0.031) after 1 month and -3.34 versus -0.80 (P=0.005) after 6 months was reported in patients undergoing PRF-EA in comparison with EA, respectively. After 1 month, 57% of patients in the PRF-EA group experienced a pain reduction of ≥50% versus only 25% of patients allocated to EA (P=0.037). Improvement decreased to 48% in the PRF-EA group whereas only 10% of EA reported significant pain relief after 6 months (P=0.008).

DISCUSSION

High-voltage PRF of dorsal root ganglion delivered through multifunctional electrode provided significant pain relief and may be considered a valuable treatment in chronic lumbosacral radicular pain with neuropathic features.

摘要

目的

尽管科学界对此很感兴趣,但脉冲射频(PRF)治疗神经性疼痛的疗效仍缺乏有力证据。为了确定高压 PRF 联合硬膜外松解术(PRF-EA)是否优于单纯硬膜外松解术(EA),我们对患有慢性腰骶神经根放射痛和神经病理性特征的患者进行了一项随机、双盲、比较有效性研究。

材料和方法

共有 41 名患者被随机分为 2 组。21 名患者被随机分配接受 2 个 240 秒的高压 PRF 周期,然后注射局部麻醉剂、透明质酸酶和倍他米松,而 20 名患者接受假刺激,然后进行松解术。治疗在受影响的腰骶神经根处进行,患者、治疗医生和评估者均对干预措施不知情。

结果

在随访时,平均数字评分量表(Numeric Rating Scale,NRS)评分显示放射痛显著减轻。与 EA 组相比,PRF-EA 组在 1 个月后分别报告了 -3.43 与 -1.75(P=0.031)和 6 个月后 -3.34 与 -0.80(P=0.005)的变化。在 1 个月时,PRF-EA 组中有 57%的患者疼痛减轻≥50%,而 EA 组仅有 25%的患者(P=0.037)。PRF-EA 组的改善率降至 48%,而 EA 组仅有 10%的患者在 6 个月后报告有显著的疼痛缓解(P=0.008)。

讨论

通过多功能电极向背根神经节施加高压 PRF 可显著缓解疼痛,可被视为治疗慢性腰骶神经根痛伴神经病理性特征的一种有价值的治疗方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7377/6903354/3b0f3aa3f99a/ajp-36-25-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7377/6903354/f4d2d7e2e9ac/ajp-36-25-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7377/6903354/cbfd2fed60b9/ajp-36-25-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7377/6903354/2e96258293bf/ajp-36-25-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7377/6903354/66b9df96203c/ajp-36-25-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7377/6903354/eff87b06f251/ajp-36-25-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7377/6903354/c548b34e0212/ajp-36-25-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7377/6903354/3b0f3aa3f99a/ajp-36-25-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7377/6903354/f4d2d7e2e9ac/ajp-36-25-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7377/6903354/cbfd2fed60b9/ajp-36-25-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7377/6903354/2e96258293bf/ajp-36-25-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7377/6903354/66b9df96203c/ajp-36-25-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7377/6903354/eff87b06f251/ajp-36-25-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7377/6903354/c548b34e0212/ajp-36-25-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7377/6903354/3b0f3aa3f99a/ajp-36-25-g009.jpg

相似文献

1
Electrocatheter-mediated High-voltage Pulsed Radiofrequency of the Dorsal Root Ganglion in the Treatment of Chronic Lumbosacral Neuropathic Pain: A Randomized Controlled Study.经皮电神经刺激仪介导的高电压脉冲射频术治疗慢性腰骶神经根性疼痛的随机对照研究。
Clin J Pain. 2020 Jan;36(1):25-33. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000766.
2
Long-term Inhibition of Soleus H-reflex with Epidural Adhesiolysis and Pulsed Radiofrequency in Lumbosacral Neuropathic Pain.硬膜外粘连松解术联合脉冲射频治疗腰骶神经病理性疼痛对比目鱼肌 H 反射的长期抑制作用
Pain Pract. 2021 Mar;21(3):277-284. doi: 10.1111/papr.12955. Epub 2020 Oct 25.
3
Effectiveness of pulsed radiofrequency with multifunctional epidural electrode in chronic lumbosacral radicular pain with neuropathic features.多功能硬膜外电极脉冲射频治疗伴有神经病理性特征的慢性腰骶部神经根性疼痛的疗效
Pain Physician. 2014 Nov-Dec;17(6):477-86.
4
The Effect of Bipolar Pulsed Radiofrequency Treatment on Chronic Lumbosacral Radicular Pain Refractory to Monopolar Pulsed Radiofrequency Treatment.双极脉冲射频治疗对经单极脉冲射频治疗无效的慢性腰骶神经根性疼痛的疗效。
Pain Physician. 2018 Mar;21(2):E97-E103.
5
Comparison between bipolar pulsed radiofrequency and monopolar pulsed radiofrequency in chronic lumbosacral radicular pain: A randomized controlled trial.双极脉冲射频与单极脉冲射频治疗慢性腰骶神经根性疼痛的比较:一项随机对照试验。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Mar;96(9):e6236. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000006236.
6
Efficacy of conditioned autologous serum therapy (Orthokine®) on the dorsal root ganglion in patients with chronic radiculalgia: study protocol for a prospective randomized placebo-controlled double-blind clinical trial (RADISAC trial).条件自体血清疗法(Orthokine®)治疗慢性根性神经痛患者背根神经节的疗效:一项前瞻性随机安慰剂对照双盲临床试验(RADISAC 试验)研究方案。
Trials. 2023 Nov 25;24(1):755. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07787-y.
7
Treatment of chronic lumbosacral radicular pain using adjuvant pulsed radiofrequency: a randomized controlled study.辅助脉冲射频治疗慢性腰骶部神经根性疼痛:一项随机对照研究。
Pain Med. 2015 Mar;16(3):432-41. doi: 10.1111/pme.12624. Epub 2014 Dec 19.
8
Efficacy of High-Voltage Pulsed Radiofrequency of the Dorsal Root Ganglion for Treatment of Chronic Lumbosacral Radicular Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial.脊神经根高压脉冲射频治疗慢性腰骶神经根痛的疗效:一项随机临床试验。
Neuromodulation. 2024 Jan;27(1):135-140. doi: 10.1016/j.neurom.2022.10.056. Epub 2022 Dec 1.
9
Efficacy and safety of pulsed radiofrequency as a method of dorsal root ganglia stimulation for treatment of non-neuropathic pain: a systematic review.脉冲射频作为一种治疗非神经性疼痛的背根神经节刺激方法的疗效和安全性:系统评价。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2020 May 4;20(1):105. doi: 10.1186/s12871-020-01023-9.
10
Ultrasound-guided pulsed radiofrequency of cervical nerve root for cervical radicular pain: a prospective randomized controlled trial.超声引导下颈神经根脉冲射频治疗颈神经根性疼痛:一项前瞻性随机对照试验。
Spine J. 2023 May;23(5):651-655. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2023.01.004. Epub 2023 Jan 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy of pulsed radiofrequency stimulation in patients with chronic pain: a narrative review.脉冲射频刺激对慢性疼痛患者的疗效:一项叙述性综述。
Front Pain Res (Lausanne). 2025 Aug 12;6:1544909. doi: 10.3389/fpain.2025.1544909. eCollection 2025.
2
Ultrasound-guided high-voltage pulsed radiofrequency versus standard-voltage pulsed radiofrequency in refractory chronic cervical radicular pain randomized clinical trial.超声引导下高压脉冲射频与标准电压脉冲射频治疗难治性慢性颈神经根性疼痛的随机临床试验
J Anesth. 2025 Jul 5. doi: 10.1007/s00540-025-03535-5.
3
Modified transforaminal epidural steroid injection combined with pulsed radiofrequency: an effective treatment measure for lumbar radiculopathy.

本文引用的文献

1
Effectiveness and Safety of High-Voltage Pulsed Radiofrequency to Treat Patients with Primary Trigeminal Neuralgia: A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Controlled Study Protocol.高压脉冲射频治疗原发性三叉神经痛的有效性和安全性:一项多中心、随机、双盲、对照研究方案。
Pain Physician. 2018 Sep;21(5):469-481.
2
Inflammation in the pathophysiology of neuropathic pain.神经病理性疼痛病理生理学中的炎症。
Pain. 2018 Mar;159(3):595-602. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001122.
3
The prevalence of probable neuropathic pain in the US: results from a multimodal general-population health survey.
改良经椎间孔硬膜外类固醇注射联合脉冲射频:一种治疗腰椎神经根病的有效措施
Front Surg. 2025 Apr 25;12:1566661. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2025.1566661. eCollection 2025.
4
Efficacy of Epidural Pulsed Radiofrequency Treatment in Persistent Spinal Pain Syndrome: A Prospective Clinical Study.硬膜外脉冲射频治疗持续性脊柱疼痛综合征的疗效:一项前瞻性临床研究。
Pain Res Manag. 2025 Apr 11;2025:6200102. doi: 10.1155/prm/6200102. eCollection 2025.
5
Ultrasound-guided caudal epidural pulsed radiofrequency for the treatment of failed back surgery syndrome: Results of a prospective clinical study.超声引导下尾段硬膜外脉冲射频治疗腰椎手术失败综合征:一项前瞻性临床研究的结果
Interv Pain Med. 2022 Sep 15;1(4):100145. doi: 10.1016/j.inpm.2022.100145. eCollection 2022 Dec.
6
Transforaminal Steroid Injection After Dorsal Root Ganglion Pulsed Radiofrequency (DRG-PRF): Impact on Pain Intensity and Disability.背根神经节脉冲射频(DRG-PRF)后经椎间孔类固醇注射:对疼痛强度和功能障碍的影响。
Pain Ther. 2024 Oct;13(5):1271-1285. doi: 10.1007/s40122-024-00639-w. Epub 2024 Jul 28.
7
Transforaminal pulsed radiofrequency and epidural steroid injection on chronic lumbar radiculopathy: A prospective observational study from a tertiary care hospital in Vietnam.经皮椎间孔脉冲射频联合硬膜外类固醇注射治疗慢性腰椎神经根病:来自越南一家三级医院的前瞻性观察研究。
PLoS One. 2024 Apr 4;19(4):e0292042. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0292042. eCollection 2024.
8
Efficacy and Safety of High-Voltage Pulsed Radiofrequency versus Standard-Voltage Pulsed Radiofrequency for Patients with Neuropathic Pain: A Literature Review and Meta-Analysis.高压脉冲射频与标准电压脉冲射频治疗神经病理性疼痛患者的疗效与安全性:一项文献综述与荟萃分析
J Pain Res. 2024 Mar 4;17:851-863. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S439909. eCollection 2024.
9
The treatment of persistent spinal pain syndrome with epidural pulsed radiofrequency: improvement of the technique.硬膜外脉冲射频治疗持续性脊柱疼痛综合征:技术改进
Front Neurol. 2023 Oct 16;14:1236270. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1236270. eCollection 2023.
10
Interventional Pain Procedures: A Narrative Review Focusing on Safety and Complications. Part 1 Injections for Spinal Pain.介入性疼痛治疗:聚焦安全性与并发症的叙述性综述。第1部分 脊柱疼痛的注射治疗
J Pain Res. 2023 May 18;16:1637-1646. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S402798. eCollection 2023.
美国可能存在的神经性疼痛的患病率:一项多模式普通人群健康调查的结果。
J Pain Res. 2017 Nov 1;10:2525-2538. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S127014. eCollection 2017.
4
Treatment of Neuropathic Pain Using Pulsed Radiofrequency: A Meta-analysis.使用脉冲射频治疗神经性疼痛:一项荟萃分析。
Pain Physician. 2016 Sep-Oct;19(7):429-44.
5
Comparative Effectivenesses of Pulsed Radiofrequency and Transforaminal Steroid Injection for Radicular Pain due to Disc Herniation: a Prospective Randomized Trial.脉冲射频与经椎间孔注射类固醇治疗椎间盘突出症所致神经根性疼痛的比较疗效:一项前瞻性随机试验
J Korean Med Sci. 2016 Aug;31(8):1324-30. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2016.31.8.1324. Epub 2016 Jun 24.
6
Bipolar High-Voltage, Long-Duration Pulsed Radiofrequency Improves Pain Relief in Postherpetic Neuralgia.双相高压、长时间脉冲射频改善带状疱疹后神经痛的疼痛缓解情况。
Pain Physician. 2016 Jul;19(5):E721-8.
7
Neuropathic pain: an updated grading system for research and clinical practice.神经病理性疼痛:用于研究和临床实践的更新分级系统。
Pain. 2016 Aug;157(8):1599-1606. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000492.
8
Reply to: Is It Not Important that We Ask the Right Question, the Right Way, on an Appropriate Sample of Patients?回复:对于合适的患者样本,我们以正确的方式提出正确的问题难道不重要吗?
Pain Med. 2016 Feb;17(2):375-7. doi: 10.1111/pm/pme.12902.
9
Investigating the Effects of Pulsed Radiofrequency on Dorsal Root Ganglion in Chronic Lumbar Radicular Pain Patients: Is It Not Important that We Ask the Right Question, the Right Way, on an Appropriate Sample of Patients?探究脉冲射频对慢性腰神经根性疼痛患者背根神经节的影响:我们以正确的方式、针对合适的患者样本提出正确的问题难道不重要吗?
Pain Med. 2016 Feb;17(2):374-5. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnv050.
10
Percutaneous Adhesiolysis Versus Transforaminal Epidural Steroid Injection for the Treatment of Chronic Radicular Pain Caused by Lumbar Foraminal Spinal Stenosis: A Retrospective Comparative Study.经皮粘连松解术与经椎间孔硬膜外类固醇注射治疗腰椎椎间孔狭窄所致慢性根性疼痛的回顾性比较研究
Ann Rehabil Med. 2015 Dec;39(6):941-9. doi: 10.5535/arm.2015.39.6.941. Epub 2015 Dec 29.