Nijman Vincent
Department of Anthropology and Geography and Centre for Functional Genomics, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, United Kingdom,
Folia Primatol (Basel). 2020;91(3):228-239. doi: 10.1159/000502093. Epub 2019 Oct 2.
Great progress has been made in unravelling the evolutionary history of Asian colobines, largely through the use of dated molecular phylogenies based on multiple markers. The Presbytis langurs are a case in point, with more allopatric species being identified, recognition of Presbytis thomasi from Sumatra rather than P. potenziani from the Mentawai Islands as being the most basal species of the group, and the discovery that P. rubicunda from Borneo is nested among the Sumatran species and only made it to Borneo in the last 1.3 million years. Based on variation in mitochondrial d-loop, it has recently been argued that Malaysia's P. femoralis femoralis is actually P. neglectus neglectus. Unfortunately, despite being available, sequences from the type locality, Singapore, were excluded from the analysis, and none of the newly generated sequences was deposited in GenBank. I manually reconstructed these sequences, which allowed me to present a molecular phylogeny that includes 8 additional sequences from West Malaysia and Singapore. P. neglectus from Malaysia and P. femoralis from Singapore form one monophyletic clade, with minimal divergence. I conclude that recognition of P. neglectus is erroneous and the name is a junior synonym of P. femoralis. Colobine taxonomy and systematics have advanced, and continue to advance, mostly by considering evidence from a wide range of individuals, species and data sets (molecular, behavioural and morphological) rather than focusing on single molecular markers from 1 or 2 species from one small geographic area. For an orderly taxonomic debate where evidence can be evaluated and reinterpreted it is essential that newly generated sequences are deposited in public repositories.
在揭示亚洲叶猴的进化历史方面已经取得了巨大进展,这主要得益于基于多个标记的有时间标定的分子系统发育研究。长鼻猴属就是一个典型例子,越来越多的异域物种被识别出来,苏门答腊的托马斯长鼻猴而非明打威群岛的波氏长鼻猴被认定为该类群中最原始的物种,并且发现婆罗洲的红腿长鼻猴嵌套在苏门答腊的物种之中,且仅在过去130万年才到达婆罗洲。基于线粒体d环的变异,最近有人认为马来西亚的黑腿长鼻猴实际上是黑背长鼻猴。遗憾的是,尽管有来自模式产地新加坡的序列,但这些序列被排除在分析之外,并且新生成的序列均未存入GenBank。我手动重建了这些序列,这使我能够呈现一个包含来自马来西亚西部和新加坡的另外8个序列的分子系统发育图。来自马来西亚的黑背长鼻猴和来自新加坡的黑腿长鼻猴形成一个单系类群,差异极小。我得出结论,黑背长鼻猴的认定是错误的,该名称是黑腿长鼻猴的次异名。叶猴的分类学和系统学已经取得了进展,并且还在继续发展,主要是通过考虑来自广泛个体、物种和数据集(分子、行为和形态)的证据,而不是专注于来自一个小地理区域的1或2个物种的单个分子标记。为了进行有序的分类学辩论,以便对证据进行评估和重新解释,将新生成的序列存入公共数据库至关重要。