• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

视觉证据:提高系统评价在卫生系统指南制定中的可用性。

Visual Evidence: Increasing Usability of Systematic Reviews in Health Systems Guidelines Development.

机构信息

Department of Medical Informatics and Clinical Epidemiology, Pacific Northwest Evidence-based Practice Center, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, United States.

出版信息

Appl Clin Inform. 2019 Aug;10(4):743-750. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1697595. Epub 2019 Oct 2.

DOI:10.1055/s-0039-1697595
PMID:31578047
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6774757/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Integration of evidence from systematic reviews is an essential step in the development of clinical guidelines. The current practice for reporting uses a static structure that does not allow for dynamic investigation. A need exists for an alternate reporting modality to facilitate dynamic visualization of results to match different end-users' queries.

OBJECTIVES

We developed a dynamic visualization of data from a systematic review using the commercial product Tableau and assessed its potential to permit customized inquiries.

METHODS

Data were selected and extracted from a previously completed systematic review. The resulting dataset was then used to develop an interactive, web-based report designed for use by a guidelines development committee.

RESULTS

A novel example of combining existing reporting standards for systematic review data and modern reporting tools was developed to investigate potential benefits of a dynamic report. Demonstrations of the report to clinicians sitting on previous and future guideline committees received positive feedback for its potential benefit in guidelines development. The report received a runner-up award during the design challenge at the 2018 Workshop on Visual Analytics in Health Care.

CONCLUSION

The use of interactive, accessible data may increase the use of systematic reviews and aid decision makers in developing evidence-based practice changes.

摘要

背景

系统评价证据的综合是临床指南制定的一个重要步骤。目前的报告实践使用静态结构,不允许动态调查。需要一种替代的报告方式,以便于动态可视化结果,以匹配不同最终用户的查询。

目的

我们使用商业产品 Tableau 对系统评价中的数据进行了动态可视化,并评估了其允许自定义查询的潜力。

方法

从之前完成的系统评价中选择和提取数据。然后,使用该数据集开发了一个交互式的、基于网络的报告,旨在供指南制定委员会使用。

结果

开发了一个新的例子,将现有的系统评价数据报告标准和现代报告工具结合起来,以调查动态报告的潜在好处。向之前和未来的指南委员会的临床医生展示该报告,得到了积极的反馈,认为其在指南制定中有潜在的好处。该报告在 2018 年医疗保健视觉分析研讨会上的设计挑战赛中获得了第二名。

结论

使用交互式、可访问的数据可能会增加系统评价的使用,并帮助决策者制定基于证据的实践改变。

相似文献

1
Visual Evidence: Increasing Usability of Systematic Reviews in Health Systems Guidelines Development.视觉证据:提高系统评价在卫生系统指南制定中的可用性。
Appl Clin Inform. 2019 Aug;10(4):743-750. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1697595. Epub 2019 Oct 2.
2
3
Towards greater understanding of implementation during systematic reviews of complex healthcare interventions: the framework for implementation transferability applicability reporting (FITAR).为了更好地理解复杂医疗干预措施系统评价中的实施情况:实施可转移性适用性报告(FITAR)框架。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019 Apr 18;19(1):80. doi: 10.1186/s12874-019-0723-y.
4
Summarizing systematic reviews: methodological development, conduct and reporting of an umbrella review approach.系统评价的总结:伞状综述方法的方法学发展、实施与报告
Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2015 Sep;13(3):132-40. doi: 10.1097/XEB.0000000000000055.
5
Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.基于证据的医学、系统评价以及介入性疼痛管理指南:第6部分。观察性研究的系统评价与荟萃分析
Pain Physician. 2009 Sep-Oct;12(5):819-50.
6
Methods for trustworthy nutritional recommendations NutriRECS (Nutritional Recommendations and accessible Evidence summaries Composed of Systematic reviews): a protocol.方法:可信的营养推荐 NutriRECS(由系统评价组成的营养推荐和可获取的证据摘要):一项方案。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018 Dec 5;18(1):162. doi: 10.1186/s12874-018-0621-8.
7
8
Review of guidelines for good practice in decision-analytic modelling in health technology assessment.卫生技术评估中决策分析模型良好实践指南综述。
Health Technol Assess. 2004 Sep;8(36):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-158. doi: 10.3310/hta8360.
9
Fit for purpose: perspectives on rapid reviews from end-user interviews.适用目的:来自终端用户访谈的快速综述观点
Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 17;6(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s13643-017-0425-7.
10
The methodological quality assessment tools for preclinical and clinical studies, systematic review and meta-analysis, and clinical practice guideline: a systematic review.临床前和临床研究、系统评价与荟萃分析以及临床实践指南的方法学质量评估工具:一项系统评价。
J Evid Based Med. 2015 Feb;8(1):2-10. doi: 10.1111/jebm.12141.

引用本文的文献

1
Creating Interactive Data Dashboards for Evidence Syntheses.为证据综合创建交互式数据仪表板。
Cochrane Evid Synth Methods. 2025 Jun 25;3(4):e70035. doi: 10.1002/cesm.70035. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
The effectiveness and acceptability of evidence synthesis summary formats for clinical guideline development groups: a mixed-methods systematic review.证据综合摘要格式对临床指南制定小组的有效性和可接受性:一项混合方法系统评价。
Implement Sci. 2022 Oct 27;17(1):74. doi: 10.1186/s13012-022-01243-2.

本文引用的文献

1
Enhancing the uptake of systematic reviews of effects: what is the best format for health care managers and policy-makers? A mixed-methods study.提高系统评价效果的采用率:哪种格式最适合医疗保健管理者和政策制定者?一项混合方法研究。
Implement Sci. 2018 Jun 22;13(1):84. doi: 10.1186/s13012-018-0779-9.
2
A usability study of two formats of a shortened systematic review for clinicians.两种缩短版系统评价格式对临床医生的可用性研究。
BMJ Open. 2014 Dec 23;4(12):e005919. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005919.
3
An iterative evaluation of two shortened systematic review formats for clinicians: a focus group study.两种简化版系统评价格式对临床医生的迭代评估:一项焦点小组研究。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014 Oct;21(e2):e341-6. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2014-002660. Epub 2014 May 1.
4
Communication and dissemination strategies to facilitate the use of health-related evidence.促进健康相关证据使用的沟通与传播策略。
Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2013 Nov(213):1-520. doi: 10.23970/ahrqepcerta213.
5
Assessing and presenting summaries of evidence in Cochrane Reviews.在Cochrane系统评价中评估并呈现证据总结。
Syst Rev. 2013 Sep 23;2:81. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-2-81.
6
Systematic reviews for evidence-based management: how to find them and what to do with them.基于循证管理的系统评价:如何查找以及如何运用它们。
Am J Manag Care. 2004 Nov;10(11 Pt 1):806-12.