• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

方法:可信的营养推荐 NutriRECS(由系统评价组成的营养推荐和可获取的证据摘要):一项方案。

Methods for trustworthy nutritional recommendations NutriRECS (Nutritional Recommendations and accessible Evidence summaries Composed of Systematic reviews): a protocol.

机构信息

Department of Community Health and Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada.

Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.

出版信息

BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018 Dec 5;18(1):162. doi: 10.1186/s12874-018-0621-8.

DOI:10.1186/s12874-018-0621-8
PMID:30518328
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6280455/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Recent systematic reviews and editorials suggest that many organizations that produce nutritional guideline recommendations do not adhere to internationally recognized standards set forth by the Institute of Medicine (IoM), Guidelines International Network (GIN), Appraisal of Guidelines Research and Evaluation (AGREE), and Grading Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE).

METHODS

The potential solution is an independent group with content expertise and skilled in the methodology of systematic reviews and practice guidelines to produce trustworthy guideline recommendations, recommendations that are supported by publication in a top tier journal. The BMJ Rapid Recommendations project has recently demonstrated the feasibility and utility of this approach. Here, we are proposing trustworthy nutritional guideline recommendations based on internationally accepted guideline development standards, recommendations that will be informed by rigorous and novel systematic reviews of the benefits and harms associated with nutritional exposures, as well as studies on the values and preferences related to dietary behaviors among members of the international community.

DISCUSSION

Adhering to international guideline standards, conducting high quality systematic reviews, and actively assessing the values and preferences of key stakeholders is expected to improve the quality of nutritional guidelines and their relevance to end-users, particularly patients and community members. We will send our work for peer review, and if found acceptable, we will publish our nutritional recommendations in top-tier general medicine journals.

摘要

背景

最近的系统评价和社论表明,许多制定营养指南建议的组织没有遵守国际医学研究所 (IoM)、指南国际网络 (GIN)、评估指南研究与评估 (AGREE) 和分级建议、评估、发展和评估 (GRADE) 规定的国际公认标准。

方法

潜在的解决方案是一个具有内容专业知识和系统评价以及实践指南方法技能的独立小组,以制定值得信赖的指南建议,这些建议得到在顶级期刊上发表的支持。BMJ 快速建议项目最近证明了这种方法的可行性和实用性。在这里,我们根据国际公认的指南制定标准提出值得信赖的营养指南建议,这些建议将通过对营养暴露相关的益处和危害进行严格和新颖的系统评价以及对国际社会成员的饮食行为相关价值观和偏好的研究来提供信息。

讨论

遵守国际指南标准、进行高质量的系统评价以及积极评估主要利益相关者的价值观和偏好,有望提高营养指南的质量及其对最终用户(特别是患者和社区成员)的相关性。我们将把我们的工作送去同行评审,如果被接受,我们将在顶级普通医学期刊上发表我们的营养建议。

相似文献

1
Methods for trustworthy nutritional recommendations NutriRECS (Nutritional Recommendations and accessible Evidence summaries Composed of Systematic reviews): a protocol.方法:可信的营养推荐 NutriRECS(由系统评价组成的营养推荐和可获取的证据摘要):一项方案。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018 Dec 5;18(1):162. doi: 10.1186/s12874-018-0621-8.
2
Recommendations from the international evidence-based guideline for the assessment and management of polycystic ovary syndrome.国际循证指南关于多囊卵巢综合征评估和管理的推荐意见。
Fertil Steril. 2018 Aug;110(3):364-379. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.05.004. Epub 2018 Jul 19.
3
Recommendations from the international evidence-based guideline for the assessment and management of polycystic ovary syndrome.多囊卵巢综合征评估与管理的国际循证指南推荐意见。
Hum Reprod. 2018 Sep 1;33(9):1602-1618. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dey256.
4
Guidelines International Network: toward international standards for clinical practice guidelines.指南国际网络:迈向临床实践指南的国际标准。
Ann Intern Med. 2012 Apr 3;156(7):525-31. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-156-7-201204030-00009.
5
Synthesis, grading, and presentation of evidence in guidelines: article 7 in Integrating and coordinating efforts in COPD guideline development. An official ATS/ERS workshop report.指南中证据的综合、分级和呈现:COPD 指南制定中整合和协调工作的第 7 条。美国胸科学会/欧洲呼吸学会工作组报告。
Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2012 Dec;9(5):256-61. doi: 10.1513/pats.201208-060ST.
6
A Critical Appraisal of National and International Clinical Practice Guidelines Reporting Nutritional Recommendations for Age-Related Macular Degeneration: Are Recommendations Evidence-Based?国家和国际临床实践指南中有关年龄相关性黄斑变性营养建议的评估:推荐意见是否基于证据?
Nutrients. 2019 Apr 11;11(4):823. doi: 10.3390/nu11040823.
7
Developing and Testing the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality's National Guideline Clearinghouse Extent of Adherence to Trustworthy Standards (NEATS) Instrument.开发和测试医疗保健研究与质量机构的国家指南清理中心对值得信赖的标准(NEATS)工具的依从程度。
Ann Intern Med. 2019 Apr 2;170(7):480-487. doi: 10.7326/M18-2950. Epub 2019 Mar 19.
8
Using evidence in pain practice: Part I: Assessing quality of systematic reviews and clinical practice guidelines.在疼痛治疗中运用证据:第一部分:评估系统评价和临床实践指南的质量。
Pain Med. 2008 Jul-Aug;9(5):518-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2008.00422_1.x.
9
Developing and Evaluating Communication Strategies to Support Informed Decisions and Practice Based on Evidence (DECIDE): protocol and preliminary results.制定和评估沟通策略以支持基于证据的知情决策和实践 (DECIDE):方案和初步结果。
Implement Sci. 2013 Jan 9;8:6. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-8-6.
10
Large-Scale Evidence-Based Guideline Development Engaging the International PCOS Community.大规模基于证据的指南制定:吸引国际多囊卵巢综合征群体参与
Semin Reprod Med. 2018 Jan;36(1):28-34. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1667312. Epub 2018 Sep 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of seven popular structured dietary programmes and risk of mortality and major cardiovascular events in patients at increased cardiovascular risk: systematic review and network meta-analysis.比较七种流行的结构化饮食方案与心血管风险增加患者的死亡率和主要心血管事件的风险:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
BMJ. 2023 Mar 29;380:e072003. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2022-072003.
2
Saturated fat and human health: a protocol for a methodologically innovative systematic review and meta-analysis to inform public health nutrition guidelines.饱和脂肪与人类健康:一项系统综述和荟萃分析的方法创新议定书,为公共卫生营养指南提供信息。
Syst Rev. 2023 Mar 14;12(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s13643-023-02209-1.
3
Values and preferences influencing willingness to change red and processed meat consumption in response to evidence-based information: a mixed methods study.价值观和偏好对基于循证信息改变红肉和加工肉类消费意愿的影响:一项混合方法研究
Public Health Nutr. 2022 Aug;25(8):2084-2098. doi: 10.1017/S1368980022000866. Epub 2022 Apr 8.
4
Governing evidence use in the nutrition policy process: evidence and lessons from the 2020 Canada food guide.规范营养政策制定过程中的循证实践:加拿大 2020 年食物指南的证据与经验。
Nutr Rev. 2022 Feb 10;80(3):467-478. doi: 10.1093/nutrit/nuab105.
5
Predictors of Higher Quality of Systematic Reviews Addressing Nutrition and Cancer Prevention.预测高质量系统评价在营养与癌症预防方面的应用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jan 3;19(1):506. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19010506.
6
Health Related Values and Preferences Regarding Meat Intake: A Cross-Sectional Mixed-Methods Study.健康相关的肉类摄入价值观和偏好:一项跨部门混合方法研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Nov 4;18(21):11585. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182111585.
7
NUQUEST-NUtrition QUality Evaluation Strengthening Tools: development of tools for the evaluation of risk of bias in nutrition studies.NUQUEST-NUtrition QUality Evaluation Strengthening Tools:用于评估营养研究偏倚风险的工具的开发。
Am J Clin Nutr. 2022 Jan 11;115(1):256-271. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqab335.
8
Values and Preferences Related to Cancer Risk among Red and Processed Meat Eaters: A Pilot Cross-Sectional Study with Semi-Structured Interviews.红肉和加工肉类食用者中与癌症风险相关的价值观和偏好:一项采用半结构化访谈的试点横断面研究。
Foods. 2021 Sep 14;10(9):2182. doi: 10.3390/foods10092182.
9
How fragile are Mediterranean diet interventions? A research-on-research study of randomised controlled trials.地中海饮食干预措施有多脆弱?一项对随机对照试验的研究之研究。
BMJ Nutr Prev Health. 2021 Mar 9;4(1):115-131. doi: 10.1136/bmjnph-2020-000188. eCollection 2021.
10
Knowledge gaps in understanding the metabolic and clinical effects of excess folates/folic acid: a summary, and perspectives, from an NIH workshop.理解过量叶酸/叶酸的代谢和临床影响方面的知识差距:NIH 研讨会的总结和观点。
Am J Clin Nutr. 2020 Nov 11;112(5):1390-1403. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqaa259.

本文引用的文献

1
Food industry sponsorship of academic research: investigating commercial bias in the research agenda.食品行业对学术研究的赞助:调查研究议程中的商业偏见。
Public Health Nutr. 2018 Dec;21(18):3422-3430. doi: 10.1017/S1368980018002100. Epub 2018 Aug 30.
2
An analysis of methods used to synthesize evidence and grade recommendations in food-based dietary guidelines.对食品为基础的膳食指南中综合证据和分级建议的方法进行分析。
Nutr Rev. 2018 Apr 1;76(4):290-300. doi: 10.1093/nutrit/nux074.
3
Disclosures in Nutrition Research: Why It Is Different.营养研究中的披露:为何与众不同。
JAMA. 2018 Feb 13;319(6):547-548. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.18571.
4
Developing reliable dietary guidelines.制定可靠的饮食指南。
BMJ. 2017 Nov 3;359:j4845. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j4845.
5
Multilayered and digitally structured presentation formats of trustworthy recommendations: a combined survey and randomised trial.可靠推荐的多层级和数字结构化呈现形式:一项综合调查与随机试验
BMJ Open. 2017 Feb 10;7(2):e011569. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011569.
6
The Scientific Basis of Guideline Recommendations on Sugar Intake: A Systematic Review.《关于糖摄入量指南建议的科学依据:系统评价》。
Ann Intern Med. 2017 Feb 21;166(4):257-267. doi: 10.7326/M16-2020. Epub 2016 Dec 20.
7
Introduction to BMJ Rapid Recommendations.《英国医学杂志》快速推荐介绍
BMJ. 2016 Sep 28;354:i5191. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i5191.
8
Relationship between Research Outcomes and Risk of Bias, Study Sponsorship, and Author Financial Conflicts of Interest in Reviews of the Effects of Artificially Sweetened Beverages on Weight Outcomes: A Systematic Review of Reviews.人工甜味饮料对体重影响的综述中研究结果与偏倚风险、研究资助及作者经济利益冲突之间的关系:一项综述的系统评价
PLoS One. 2016 Sep 8;11(9):e0162198. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0162198. eCollection 2016.
9
Improvement evident but still necessary in clinical practice guideline quality: a systematic review.临床实践指南质量虽有明显改善但仍有必要:一项系统评价
J Clin Epidemiol. 2017 Jan;81:13-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.08.005. Epub 2016 Aug 24.
10
GRADE Evidence to Decision (EtD) frameworks: a systematic and transparent approach to making well informed healthcare choices. 2: Clinical practice guidelines.GRADE证据到决策(EtD)框架:一种用于做出明智医疗选择的系统且透明的方法。2:临床实践指南。
BMJ. 2016 Jun 30;353:i2089. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i2089.