Memphis Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Memphis, TN, USA.
University of Tennessee College of Pharmacy, Memphis, TN, USA.
Ann Pharmacother. 2020 Mar;54(3):226-231. doi: 10.1177/1060028019880305. Epub 2019 Oct 3.
α-1 adrenergic antagonists are commonly prescribed, but there is question regarding their safety in patients at increased fall risk. The purpose of the FRAGILE study was to determine the risk for developing adverse drug events (ADEs) in veterans prescribed α-1 blockers. A single-center, retrospective, observational cohort analysis was conducted of veterans newly initiated on α-1 antagonists. Veterans were categorized into at-risk (patients who met at least 1 of 2 criteria: age 65 or older or high initial dose of α blockade) or control (veterans without either risk factor) groups. The primary outcome was the composite all-cause ADEs, including hospitalizations or emergency department (ED) visits. Secondary outcomes included number of fall-related ADEs and medication discontinuation rates with follow-up for 12 months. A total of 300 veterans were evaluated. There was no significant difference in the composite outcome of all-cause ED visits between at-risk (n = 169) versus control (n = 131) groups (0.81 vs 1.17, = 0.09) or all-cause hospitalizations (0.28 vs 0.39, = 0.25). Seventy-three veterans in the at-risk group experienced an all-cause ADE versus 64 in the control group ( = 0.36). No significant differences in secondary outcomes were found. Fall-related side effects occurred in 8% of the total cohort. Rates of all-cause or fall-related ADEs were not significantly different. An 8% discontinuation rate resulting from fall-related ADEs and high rates of coadministered medications that could increase fall risk. Pharmacists can play a key role in optimizing α-1 blocker administration.
α-1 肾上腺素能拮抗剂通常被开处方,但在有跌倒风险增加的患者中,其安全性存在疑问。FRAGILE 研究的目的是确定新开始使用 α-1 阻滞剂的退伍军人发生药物不良事件(ADE)的风险。对新开始使用 α-1 拮抗剂的退伍军人进行了一项单中心、回顾性、观察性队列分析。退伍军人分为高危组(符合以下至少 1 项标准的患者:年龄 65 岁或以上或 α 阻断的初始高剂量)或对照组(无任何危险因素的退伍军人)。主要结局是全因 ADE 的复合结局,包括住院或急诊就诊。次要结局包括与跌倒相关的 ADE 数量和 12 个月随访时的药物停药率。共评估了 300 名退伍军人。高危组(n = 169)与对照组(n = 131)的全因 ED 就诊复合结局无显著差异(0.81 比 1.17, = 0.09)或全因住院(0.28 比 0.39, = 0.25)。高危组有 73 名退伍军人出现全因 ADE,对照组有 64 名( = 0.36)。次要结局无显著差异。高危组有 8%的退伍军人发生全因 ADE,对照组有 7%( = 0.36)。全因或与跌倒相关的 ADE 发生率无显著差异。8%的停药率是由与跌倒相关的 ADE 引起的,并且有很高的同时使用的药物会增加跌倒风险。药剂师可以在优化 α-1 阻滞剂治疗中发挥关键作用。