• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The GP Score, a Simplified Formula (Bioptic Gleason Score Times Prostate Specific Antigen) as a Predictor for Biochemical Failure after Prostatectomy in Prostate Cancer.GP评分,一种简化公式(穿刺活检Gleason评分乘以前列腺特异性抗原)作为前列腺癌前列腺切除术后生化复发的预测指标。
Curr Urol. 2019 Sep;13(1):25-30. doi: 10.1159/000499298. Epub 2019 Sep 10.
2
Optimizing D'Amico risk groups in radical prostatectomy through the addition of magnetic resonance imaging data.通过添加磁共振成像数据优化根治性前列腺切除术中的达米科风险分组。
Actas Urol Esp. 2014 Nov;38(9):594-9. doi: 10.1016/j.acuro.2014.03.003. Epub 2014 May 3.
3
Reassessment of the risk factors for biochemical recurrence in D'Amico intermediate-risk prostate cancer treated using radical prostatectomy.对采用根治性前列腺切除术治疗的达米科中度风险前列腺癌生化复发危险因素的重新评估。
Int J Urol. 2015 Nov;22(11):1029-35. doi: 10.1111/iju.12898. Epub 2015 Aug 20.
4
Heterogeneity of Outcomes in D'Amico Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer Patients after Radical Prostatectomy: Influence of Primary and Secondary Gleason Score.根治性前列腺切除术后 D'Amico 中危前列腺癌患者结局的异质性:原发和次要 Gleason 评分的影响。
Oncol Res Treat. 2017;40(9):508-514. doi: 10.1159/000477545. Epub 2017 Aug 10.
5
Preoperative model for predicting prostate specific antigen recurrence after radical prostatectomy using percent of biopsy tissue with cancer, biopsy Gleason grade and serum prostate specific antigen.使用癌组织活检百分比、活检Gleason分级和血清前列腺特异性抗原预测根治性前列腺切除术后前列腺特异性抗原复发的术前模型。
J Urol. 2004 Jun;171(6 Pt 1):2215-20. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000124463.13319.0a.
6
Improved risk stratification for biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy using a novel risk group system based on prostate specific antigen density and biopsy Gleason score.使用基于前列腺特异性抗原密度和活检Gleason评分的新型风险分组系统改善根治性前列腺切除术后生化复发的风险分层。
J Urol. 2002 Jul;168(1):110-5.
7
Clinical utility of percent prostate needle biopsy tissue with cancer cutpoints to risk stratify patients before radical prostatectomy.前列腺穿刺活检组织中癌灶比例在前列腺癌根治术前对患者进行风险分层的临床应用价值。
Urology. 2002 Jul;60(1):84-8. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(02)01660-6.
8
The ability of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) density to predict an upgrade in Gleason score between initial prostate biopsy and prostatectomy diminishes with increasing tumour grade due to reduced PSA secretion per unit tumour volume.前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)密度预测初始前列腺活检和前列腺切除术中 Gleason 评分升级的能力随着肿瘤分级的增加而降低,这是由于单位肿瘤体积的 PSA 分泌减少所致。
BJU Int. 2012 Jul;110(1):36-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10681.x. Epub 2011 Nov 15.
9
Outcomes of Gleason score 3 + 4 = 7 prostate cancer with minimal amounts (<6%) vs ≥6% of Gleason pattern 4 tissue in needle biopsy specimens.针吸活检标本中Gleason模式4组织含量极少(<6%)与≥6%的Gleason评分为3 + 4 = 7的前列腺癌的预后情况。
Ann Diagn Pathol. 2016 Feb;20:48-51. doi: 10.1016/j.anndiagpath.2015.10.013. Epub 2015 Dec 2.
10
Evaluation of four pre-operative models for prediction of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy in localised prostate cancer.评估四种局部前列腺癌根治性前列腺切除术后预测生化复发的术前模型。
Int J Clin Pract. 2021 Oct;75(10):e14682. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.14682. Epub 2021 Aug 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Deep learning-based radiomics model from pretreatment ADC to predict biochemical recurrence in advanced prostate cancer.基于深度学习的影像组学模型:从治疗前表观扩散系数预测晚期前列腺癌的生化复发
Front Oncol. 2024 Feb 27;14:1342104. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1342104. eCollection 2024.
2
A preoperative magnetic resonance imaging-based model to predict biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy.基于术前磁共振成像的模型预测根治性前列腺切除术后生化失败。
Sci Rep. 2023 Jan 9;13(1):452. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-26920-6.

本文引用的文献

1
Review of Bioptic Gleason Scores by Central Pathologist Modifies the Risk Classification in Prostate Cancer.中心病理学家对穿刺活检Gleason评分的复查改变了前列腺癌的风险分类。
Urol Int. 2015;95(4):452-6. doi: 10.1159/000439440. Epub 2015 Oct 3.
2
Clinical predictors and recommendations for staging computed tomography scan among men with prostate cancer.前列腺癌男性患者分期计算机断层扫描的临床预测因素及建议。
Urology. 2014 Dec;84(6):1329-34. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2014.07.051. Epub 2014 Oct 5.
3
Role of novel risk classification method, Prostate Cancer Risk Index (PRIX) for clinically localized prostate cancer after high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy as monotherapy.新型风险分类方法——前列腺癌风险指数(PRIX)在单纯高剂量率间质近距离治疗后局限性前列腺癌中的作用。
Anticancer Res. 2014 Jun;34(6):3077-81.
4
Assessing the most accurate formula to predict the risk of lymph node metastases from prostate cancer in contemporary patients treated with radical prostatectomy and extended pelvic lymph node dissection.评估在接受根治性前列腺切除术和扩大盆腔淋巴结清扫术的当代患者中,预测淋巴结转移风险的最准确公式。
Radiother Oncol. 2013 Nov;109(2):211-6. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2013.05.029. Epub 2013 Jun 30.
5
The predictive value of endorectal 3 Tesla multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for extraprostatic extension in patients with low, intermediate and high risk prostate cancer.3T 磁共振直肠内多参数成像预测低、中、高危前列腺癌患者前列腺外侵犯的价值。
J Urol. 2013 Nov;190(5):1728-34. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.05.021. Epub 2013 May 13.
6
Multi-institutional validation of the CAPRA-S score to predict disease recurrence and mortality after radical prostatectomy.多机构验证 CAPRA-S 评分在预测根治性前列腺切除术后疾病复发和死亡中的作用。
Eur Urol. 2014 Jun;65(6):1171-7. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.03.058. Epub 2013 Apr 8.
7
Validation of the Prostate Cancer Risk Index (PRIX): a simple scoring system to predict risk of biochemical relapse after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.验证前列腺癌风险指数(PRIX):一种简单的评分系统,可预测前列腺癌根治性前列腺切除术后生化复发的风险。
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2011 Nov;41(11):1271-6. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyr139. Epub 2011 Oct 4.
8
A new formula for prostate cancer lymph node risk.前列腺癌淋巴结风险的新公式。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011 May 1;80(1):69-75. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.01.068. Epub 2010 Jun 30.
9
Minimal impact of clinical stage on prostate cancer prognosis among contemporary patients with clinically localized disease.临床分期对当代局限性前列腺癌患者预后的影响较小。
J Urol. 2010 Jul;184(1):114-9. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.03.025. Epub 2010 May 15.
10
Predicting the risk of pelvic node involvement among men with prostate cancer in the contemporary era.预测当代前列腺癌男性患者盆腔淋巴结受累的风险。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009 May 1;74(1):104-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.07.053. Epub 2009 Mar 13.

GP评分,一种简化公式(穿刺活检Gleason评分乘以前列腺特异性抗原)作为前列腺癌前列腺切除术后生化复发的预测指标。

The GP Score, a Simplified Formula (Bioptic Gleason Score Times Prostate Specific Antigen) as a Predictor for Biochemical Failure after Prostatectomy in Prostate Cancer.

作者信息

Soga Norihito, Ogura Yuji, Wakita Toshiaki, Kageyama Takumi, Furusawa Jun

机构信息

Department of Urology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya.

Department of Urology, Wakita Clinic, Aichi.

出版信息

Curr Urol. 2019 Sep;13(1):25-30. doi: 10.1159/000499298. Epub 2019 Sep 10.

DOI:10.1159/000499298
PMID:31579210
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6771044/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

We used a new GP score (Gleason score multiplied by prostate-specific antigen) without the T stage as a predictive value for biochemical failure (BCF) after prostatectomy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We assessed 459 prostate cancer patients who underwent prostatectomies at our institution. Three sub-groups were defined in terms of D'Amico classification risk (low, intermediate, and high) and Gleason score (low, < 50; intermediate, 50-100; and high GP score, > 100). Risk factors for BCF were evaluated by multivariate analysis with a Cox hazard model. A log-rank test was used to compare the BCF rate in the 2 groups.

RESULTS

There was nosignificant difference in the non-BCF rate between the lowrisk and low GP score subgroups or the intermediate risk andintermediate GP score subgroups. In contrast, the non-BCFrate of the high GP score subgroup (42.1%) was significantlylower than that of the high-risk subgroup (66.1%, log-rankp = 0.008). Based on multivariate analysis, a high GP score(p = 0.001; HR 3.78; 95%CI 1.95-7.35) was a significant independent risk factor for BCF after prostatectomy.

CONCLUSION

The GP score, consisting of two absolute numbers, may be a valuable predictive factor for BCF after prostatectomy, especially in the high-risk failure group.

摘要

目的

我们使用一种新的GP评分(Gleason评分乘以前列腺特异性抗原),不考虑T分期,作为前列腺切除术后生化复发(BCF)的预测指标。

材料与方法

我们评估了在本机构接受前列腺切除术的459例前列腺癌患者。根据D'Amico分类风险(低、中、高)和Gleason评分(低,<50;中,50 - 100;高GP评分,>100)定义了三个亚组。通过Cox风险模型进行多因素分析评估BCF的危险因素。采用对数秩检验比较两组的BCF发生率。

结果

低风险和低GP评分亚组之间或中风险和中GP评分亚组之间的无BCF发生率无显著差异。相比之下,高GP评分亚组的无BCF发生率(42.1%)显著低于高风险亚组(66.1%,对数秩检验p = 0.008)。基于多因素分析,高GP评分(p = 0.001;风险比3.78;95%置信区间1.95 - 7.35)是前列腺切除术后BCF的显著独立危险因素。

结论

由两个绝对值组成的GP评分可能是前列腺切除术后BCF的有价值预测因素,尤其是在高风险复发组。