Frimpong-Boateng Kwabena, Edwin Frank
University of Ghana College of Health Sciences, Accra, Ghana.
University of Health and Allied Sciences, Ho, Ghana.
Innov Surg Sci. 2019 Apr 2;4(2):59-64. doi: 10.1515/iss-2018-0036. eCollection 2019 Jun.
Surgical care has been described as one of the Cinderellas in the global health development agenda, taking a backseat to public health, child health, and infectious diseases. In the midst of such competing health-care needs, surgical care, often viewed by policy makers as luxurious and the preserve of the rich, gets relegated to the bottom of priority lists. In the meantime, infectious disease, malnutrition, and other ailments, viewed as largely affecting the poor and disadvantaged in society, get embedded in national health plans, receiving substantial funding and public health program development. It is often stated that the main reason for this sad state of affairs in surgical care is the lack of political will to improve matters in the health sector. Indeed, in 2001, the Commission on Macroeconomics and Health concluded that the lack of political will to sufficiently increase spending on health at the sub-national, national, and international levels was perhaps the most critical barrier to improving health in low-income countries. However, at the root of this lack of political will is a lack of political priority for surgical care.
外科护理在全球卫生发展议程中一直被视为灰姑娘之一,排在公共卫生、儿童健康和传染病之后。在众多相互竞争的医疗需求中,外科护理往往被政策制定者视为奢侈且是富人的专属,被排在优先事项清单的末尾。与此同时,被视为主要影响社会中贫困和弱势群体的传染病、营养不良及其他疾病,被纳入国家卫生计划,获得大量资金和公共卫生项目开发。人们常说,外科护理这种令人遗憾的状况的主要原因是缺乏改善卫生部门状况的政治意愿。事实上,2001年宏观经济与卫生委员会得出结论,在国家以下、国家和国际层面缺乏充分增加卫生支出的政治意愿,可能是低收入国家改善健康状况的最关键障碍。然而,这种缺乏政治意愿的根源是对外科护理缺乏政治优先权。