• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

自粘接可流动复合树脂作为乳磨牙咬合面修复材料的临床评价:一年结果

Clinical evaluation of a self-adhering flowable composite as occlusal restorative material in primary molars: one-year results.

作者信息

Serin Buse Ayse, Yazicioglu Iffet, Deveci Ceren, Dogan Muharrem Cem

机构信息

Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Cukurova University, Adana, Turkey.

出版信息

Eur Oral Res. 2019 Sep;53(3):119-124. doi: 10.26650/eor.20190025. Epub 2019 Sep 1.

DOI:10.26650/eor.20190025
PMID:31579892
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6761486/
Abstract

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the 1 year clinical performances of a self-adhering flowable composite and a commercially available self-etch adhesive/composite system in occlusal restorations of primary second molars.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty-one patients (10 male, 21 female) were recruited into the study. A total of 62 occlusal cavities were restored with either a universal composite or a self-adhering flowable composite according to manufacturers' instructions. The restorations were clinically evaluated 1 month after placement as baseline, and after 3, 6 months and 1 year post-operatively using modified USPHS criteria by two operators.

RESULTS

Lack of retention was not observed in any of the restorations. With respect to color match, marginal adaptation, secondary caries and surface texture, no significant differences were found between two restorative materials tested after 1 year. None of the restorations had marginal discoloration and anatomic form loss on the 1 year follow-up. Restorations did not exhibit post-operative sensitivity at any evaluation period.

CONCLUSION

The clinical assessment of self-adhering flowable composite exhibited good clinical results with predominating alpha scores after 1 year. Advantage of the application convenience for children is promising for self-adhered flowable composite materials in pediatric use.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估和比较自粘结可流动复合树脂与市售自酸蚀粘结剂/复合树脂系统在乳磨牙咬合面修复中的1年临床性能。

材料与方法

招募31例患者(男10例,女21例)纳入本研究。根据制造商的说明,共62个咬合面洞形分别用通用复合树脂或自粘结可流动复合树脂进行修复。修复体在放置后1个月作为基线进行临床评估,并在术后3、6个月和1年由两名操作人员使用改良的美国公共卫生服务(USPHS)标准进行评估。

结果

所有修复体均未观察到固位缺失。在颜色匹配、边缘适应性、继发龋和表面质地方面,1年后测试的两种修复材料之间未发现显著差异。在1年的随访中,所有修复体均未出现边缘变色和解剖形态丧失。在任何评估期,修复体均未表现出术后敏感。

结论

自粘结可流动复合树脂的临床评估在1年后显示出良好的临床效果,α评分占主导。自粘结可流动复合材料在儿科应用中具有便于儿童使用的优势,前景广阔。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ceab/6761486/45fc34e5fd39/eor-053-119-e002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ceab/6761486/1caf01eb136e/eor-053-119-e001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ceab/6761486/45fc34e5fd39/eor-053-119-e002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ceab/6761486/1caf01eb136e/eor-053-119-e001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ceab/6761486/45fc34e5fd39/eor-053-119-e002.jpg

相似文献

1
Clinical evaluation of a self-adhering flowable composite as occlusal restorative material in primary molars: one-year results.自粘接可流动复合树脂作为乳磨牙咬合面修复材料的临床评价:一年结果
Eur Oral Res. 2019 Sep;53(3):119-124. doi: 10.26650/eor.20190025. Epub 2019 Sep 1.
2
Clinical Evaluation of a Self-Adhering Flowable Resin Composite in Minimally Invasive Class I Cavities: 5-year Results of a Double Blind Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial.自粘性可流动树脂复合材料用于微创I类洞的临床评价:一项双盲随机对照临床试验的5年结果
Acta Stomatol Croat. 2020 Mar;54(1):10-21. doi: 10.15644/asc54/1/2.
3
Clinical evaluation of resin-based composites in posterior restorations: 12-month results.基于树脂的复合材料在后牙修复中的临床评估:12个月的结果。
Eur J Dent. 2010 Jan;4(1):57-65.
4
Two-year clinical evaluation of ormocer and nanofill composite with and without a flowable liner.含和不含可流动衬层的有机硅氧烷陶瓷和纳米填料复合材料的两年临床评估
J Adhes Dent. 2006 Apr;8(2):119-26.
5
Does a Self-adhesive Flowable Resin Composite Perform Similarly to Highly Filled and Conventional Flowable Resin Composites in Occlusal Cavities? A 2-year Follow-up Study.自粘接流动树脂复合材料在咬合面窝洞中的性能是否与高填料流动树脂复合材料和传统流动树脂复合材料相似?一项为期 2 年的随访研究。
J Adhes Dent. 2021 Dec 3;23(6):497-503. doi: 10.3290/j.jad.b2288205.
6
An 18-month clinical evaluation of three different universal adhesives used with a universal flowable composite resin in the restoration of non-carious cervical lesions.三种通用型黏合剂联合通用型流动复合树脂修复非龋性颈缘缺损 18 个月的临床评估。
Clin Oral Investig. 2019 Mar;23(3):1443-1452. doi: 10.1007/s00784-018-2571-2. Epub 2018 Aug 14.
7
A 24-Month Evaluation of Self-Adhering Flowable Composite Compared to Conventional Flowable Composite in Conservative Simple Occlusal Restorations: A Randomized Clinical Trial.自粘性可流动复合树脂与传统可流动复合树脂用于保守性简单咬合面修复的24个月评估:一项随机临床试验
Contemp Clin Dent. 2021 Oct-Dec;12(4):368-375. doi: 10.4103/ccd.ccd_600_20. Epub 2021 Dec 21.
8
Clinical evaluation of self-adhering flowable composite versus conventional flowable composite in conservative Class I cavities: Randomized controlled trial.自粘性可流动复合树脂与传统可流动复合树脂用于保守性Ⅰ类洞的临床评价:随机对照试验
J Conserv Dent. 2018 Sep-Oct;21(5):485-490. doi: 10.4103/JCD.JCD_210_18.
9
Three-year Clinical Performance of Two Giomer Restorative Materials in Restorations.两种聚硅烷-玻璃离子修复材料修复体的三年临床性能
Oper Dent. 2021 Jan 1;46(1):E60-E67. doi: 10.2341/17-353-C.
10
Clinical evaluation of resin-based composites in posterior restorations: two-year results.后牙修复体中树脂基复合材料的临床评价:两年的结果。
Oper Dent. 2010 Jul-Aug;35(4):397-404. doi: 10.2341/09-345-C.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical Performance of Self-Adhesive vs. Conventional Flowable Resin Composite Restorations in Posterior Teeth: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials.自粘性与传统可流动树脂复合材料在后牙修复中的临床性能:一项随机试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
J Clin Med. 2025 Aug 19;14(16):5862. doi: 10.3390/jcm14165862.
2
Clinical outcomes of direct resin-composite restorations in primary maxillary incisors in patients with early childhood caries: a prospective non-controlled cohort study.乳牙龋患儿上颌乳切牙直接树脂复合材料修复的临床疗效:一项前瞻性非对照队列研究
BMC Oral Health. 2025 Apr 20;25(1):608. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-05814-9.
3

本文引用的文献

1
The Burden and Management of Dental Caries in Older Children.大龄儿童龋齿的负担与管理
Pediatr Clin North Am. 2018 Oct;65(5):955-963. doi: 10.1016/j.pcl.2018.05.005.
2
Efficacy of sealing occlusal caries with a flowable composite in primary molars: A 2-year randomized controlled clinical trial.用流动复合树脂封闭乳磨牙窝沟龋的疗效:一项为期 2 年的随机对照临床试验。
J Dent. 2018 Jul;74:49-55. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2018.05.014. Epub 2018 May 22.
3
Bonding performance of self-adhesive flowable composites to enamel, dentin and a nano-hybrid composite.
Comprehensive Evaluation of Long-Term Dentin Bond Strength, Water Sorption, Solubility, and Degree of Conversion of Self-Adhesive Resin Composites.
自粘接树脂复合材料的长期牙本质粘接强度、吸水性、溶解度和转化率的综合评价。
J Adhes Dent. 2024 Sep 17;26:213-222. doi: 10.3290/j.jad.b5749506.
4
A 24-Month Evaluation of Self-Adhering Flowable Composite Compared to Conventional Flowable Composite in Conservative Simple Occlusal Restorations: A Randomized Clinical Trial.自粘性可流动复合树脂与传统可流动复合树脂用于保守性简单咬合面修复的24个月评估:一项随机临床试验
Contemp Clin Dent. 2021 Oct-Dec;12(4):368-375. doi: 10.4103/ccd.ccd_600_20. Epub 2021 Dec 21.
5
Bond Strength of Self-Adhesive Flowable Composites and Glass Ionomer Cements to Primary Teeth: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of In Vitro Studies.自粘性可流动复合材料和玻璃离子水门汀与乳牙的粘结强度:体外研究的系统评价和荟萃分析
Materials (Basel). 2021 Nov 6;14(21):6694. doi: 10.3390/ma14216694.
6
Scoping review of trials evaluating adhesive strategies in pediatric dentistry: where do simplified strategies lie?评价儿童牙科黏结策略试验的范围回顾:简化策略在哪里?
BMC Oral Health. 2021 Jan 19;21(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s12903-021-01395-5.
自粘性可流动复合树脂与牙釉质、牙本质及纳米混合复合树脂的粘结性能
Odontology. 2018 Apr;106(2):171-180. doi: 10.1007/s10266-017-0324-3. Epub 2017 Dec 14.
4
Comparative evaluation of shear bond strength and nanoleakage of conventional and self-adhering flowable composites to primary teeth dentin.传统和自粘结可流动复合树脂与乳牙髓腔牙本质的剪切粘结强度和纳米渗漏的比较评估
Contemp Clin Dent. 2016 Jul-Sep;7(3):326-31. doi: 10.4103/0976-237X.188549.
5
Flowable Resin Composites: A Systematic Review and Clinical Considerations.可流动树脂复合材料:系统评价与临床考量
J Clin Diagn Res. 2015 Jun;9(6):ZE18-24. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2015/12294.6129. Epub 2015 Jun 1.
6
Shear bond strength of a new low-shrinkage flowable composite for orthodontic bracket bonding.一种用于正畸托槽粘结的新型低收缩可流动复合树脂的剪切粘结强度
J Dent Child (Chic). 2014 May-Aug;81(2):63-6.
7
Shear-bond strength of a new self-adhering flowable restorative material to dentin of primary molars.一种新型自粘结可流动修复材料与乳磨牙牙本质的剪切粘结强度。
J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2013 Winter;38(2):149-54. doi: 10.17796/jcpd.38.2.l3q5l3128k2870j7.
8
Shear bond strength of self-adhering flowable composite on dentin with and without application of an adhesive system.有无使用粘结系统时,自粘结可流动复合树脂与牙本质之间的剪切粘结强度。
J Appl Biomater Funct Mater. 2014 Sep 5;12(2):97-101. doi: 10.5301/jabfm.5000166.
9
Bonding performance of a newly developed step-less all-in-one system on dentin.新型无台阶一体化系统在牙本质上的粘结性能。
Dent Mater J. 2013;32(2):203-11. doi: 10.4012/dmj.2012-204.
10
The effect of clinical performance on the survival estimates of direct restorations.临床性能对直接修复体生存预估的影响。
Restor Dent Endod. 2013 Feb;38(1):11-20. doi: 10.5395/rde.2013.38.1.11. Epub 2013 Feb 26.