Department of Zoology, Stockholm University, 114 18, Stockholm, Sweden.
Department of Biosciences, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 65, FIN-00014, Helsinki, Finland.
Evolution. 2019 Nov;73(11):2312-2323. doi: 10.1111/evo.13845. Epub 2019 Oct 21.
Species with fast life-histories typically prioritize current over future reproductive events, compared to species with slow life-histories. These species therefore require greater energetic input into reproduction, and also likely have less time to realize their reproductive potential. Hence, behaviors that increase access to both resources and mating opportunities, at a cost of increased mortality risk, could coevolve with the pace of life-history. However, whether this prediction holds across species, remains untested under standardized conditions. Here, we test how risky behaviors, which facilitate access to resources and mating opportunities (i.e., activity, boldness, and aggression), along with metabolic rate, coevolve with the pace of life-history across 20 species of killifish that present remarkable divergences in the pace of life-history. We found a positive association between the pace of life-history and aggression, but interestingly not with other behavioral traits or metabolic rate. Aggression is linked to interference competition, and in killifishes is often employed to secure mates, while activity and boldness are more relevant for exploiting energetic resources. Our results suggest that the trade-off between current and future reproduction plays a more prominent role in shaping mating behavior, while behaviors related to energy acquisition may be influenced by ecological factors.
与生活史缓慢的物种相比,生活史快速的物种通常更倾向于当前的生殖事件而不是未来的生殖事件。因此,这些物种需要更多的能量投入到生殖中,而且可能没有太多的时间来实现其生殖潜力。因此,那些以增加死亡率为代价来增加获取资源和交配机会的行为可能会与生活史的节奏一起进化。然而,这种预测在标准化条件下是否适用于所有物种,还有待检验。在这里,我们测试了风险行为(即活动、大胆和攻击性)如何与代谢率一起与 20 种丽鱼科鱼类的生活史节奏共同进化,这些鱼类在生活史节奏上表现出显著的差异。我们发现生活史节奏与攻击性之间存在正相关关系,但有趣的是,与其他行为特征或代谢率无关。攻击性与干扰竞争有关,在丽鱼科鱼类中,攻击性通常用于获取配偶,而活动和大胆则与利用能量资源更为相关。我们的结果表明,当前和未来生殖之间的权衡在塑造交配行为方面起着更为重要的作用,而与能量获取相关的行为可能受到生态因素的影响。