• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

诺氟沙星与其他七种抗菌药物对尿路感染临床分离株的体外活性比较

Comparative in vitro activity of norfloxacin and seven other antimicrobial agents against clinical isolates from urinary tract infections.

作者信息

Esko E, Renkonen O V

出版信息

Scand J Infect Dis. 1985;17(1):95-8. doi: 10.3109/00365548509070427.

DOI:10.3109/00365548509070427
PMID:3158071
Abstract

The in vitro activity of norfloxacin, a new quinolone derivative, was tested against 469 clinical isolates derived mainly from urinary samples from outpatients. It inhibited all Escherichia coli, Klebsiella oxytoca and Proteus strains at a concentration of 0.25 micrograms/ml, and all Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Enterobacter, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Staphylococcus and Enterococcus strains at a concentration of 8 micrograms/ml or less. Norfloxacin proved to be more effective than nalidixic acid, trimethoprim, mecillinam and nitrofurantoin against all gram-negative rods tested.

摘要

对一种新的喹诺酮衍生物诺氟沙星的体外活性进行了测试,受试对象为469株主要来自门诊患者尿液样本的临床分离菌。它在浓度为0.25微克/毫升时可抑制所有大肠杆菌、产酸克雷伯菌和变形杆菌菌株,在浓度为8微克/毫升或更低时可抑制所有铜绿假单胞菌、肠杆菌、肺炎克雷伯菌、葡萄球菌和肠球菌菌株。结果证明,诺氟沙星对所有测试的革兰氏阴性杆菌的抗菌效果均优于萘啶酸、甲氧苄啶、美西林和呋喃妥因。

相似文献

1
Comparative in vitro activity of norfloxacin and seven other antimicrobial agents against clinical isolates from urinary tract infections.诺氟沙星与其他七种抗菌药物对尿路感染临床分离株的体外活性比较
Scand J Infect Dis. 1985;17(1):95-8. doi: 10.3109/00365548509070427.
2
Study of the in vitro activity of norfloxacin and other drugs on amoxicillin-resistant uropathogenic isolates.诺氟沙星及其他药物对耐阿莫西林尿路致病性分离株的体外活性研究。
Chemioterapia. 1984 Jun;3(3):167-72.
3
Comparative in vitro activities of norfloxacin (MK-0366) and six commonly used antimicrobial agents against 199 urinary isolates showing various degrees of antibiotic resistance.诺氟沙星(MK - 0366)与六种常用抗菌剂对199株显示不同程度抗生素耐药性的尿液分离株的体外活性比较。
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1984 Apr;2(2):101-6. doi: 10.1016/0732-8893(84)90004-x.
4
Norfloxacin: in vitro activity compared with that of seven other antibacterial agents against urinary tract pathogens.诺氟沙星:与其他七种抗菌剂相比,对尿路病原体的体外活性。
Acta Pathol Microbiol Immunol Scand B. 1984 Apr;92(2):101-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1699-0463.1984.tb02802.x.
5
[Comparative studies on activities of antimicrobial agents against causative organisms isolated from urinary tract infections (1989). I. Susceptibility distribution].[1989年抗微生物剂对从尿路感染分离出的病原体的活性比较研究。I. 敏感性分布]
Jpn J Antibiot. 1995 Sep;48(9):1131-60.
6
Comparative in vitro activity of norfloxacin (MK-0366) and ten other oral antimicrobial agents against urinary bacterial isolates.诺氟沙星(MK-0366)与其他十种口服抗菌药物对尿细菌分离株的体外活性比较
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1982 May;21(5):848-51. doi: 10.1128/AAC.21.5.848.
7
Studies on cinoxacin. 1. In vitro activity of cinoxacin, as compared to nalidixic acid, against urinary tract pathogens.西诺沙星的研究。1. 西诺沙星与萘啶酸相比,对尿路病原体的体外活性。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1977 Sep;3(5):411-6. doi: 10.1093/jac/3.5.411.
8
Comparative in vitro activity of norfloxacin and four other chemotherapeutics against urinary gram-negative isolates.诺氟沙星与其他四种化疗药物对泌尿生殖道革兰氏阴性分离株的体外活性比较
Chemioterapia. 1984 Jun;3(3):196-9.
9
Comparative study using norfloxacin and amoxycillin in the treatment of complicated urinary tract infections in geriatric patients.诺氟沙星与阿莫西林治疗老年患者复杂性尿路感染的对比研究。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1984 May;13 Suppl B:79-83. doi: 10.1093/jac/13.suppl_b.79.
10
In vitro activity of ciprofloxacin, norfloxacin and nalidixic acid.环丙沙星、诺氟沙星和萘啶酸的体外活性。
Eur J Clin Microbiol. 1983 Apr;2(2):111-5. doi: 10.1007/BF02001575.

引用本文的文献

1
Identification of Streptococcus faecalis and Streptococcus faecium and susceptibility studies with newly developed antimicrobial agents.粪肠球菌和屎肠球菌的鉴定以及新型抗菌剂的药敏研究。
J Clin Microbiol. 1987 May;25(5):787-90. doi: 10.1128/jcm.25.5.787-790.1987.