Park Jinju, Minh Luu Ngoc, Shin Sang Hwa, Oh Jin-Kyoung, Yun E Hwa, Lee Duckhyung, Lim Min Kyung
Department of Cancer Control and Population Health, Graduate School of Cancer Science and Policy, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea.
Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Control Institute, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea.
Tob Induc Dis. 2019 Mar 22;17:21. doi: 10.18332/tid/104674. eCollection 2019.
While tobacco control policies have been adopted and enforced, and anti-smoking campaigns have been conducted, the evaluation of their impact on tobacco quitting is lacking in Korea. Therefore, the effectiveness of tobacco control policies and mass media campaigns to encourage use of the Quitline were evaluated by monitoring call volume on Quitline, which has been in operation since 2006, in Korea.
Tobacco control policies and mass media campaigns, from 1 January of 2007 to 31 December of 2016, were assessed from the review of government documents and the history of law and regulation changes. The corresponding period incoming call volumes of the Quitline were assesed. The average monthly call volume, when policies and anti-smoking advertising were implemented, was compared with that of the whole year or baseline years (2007 and 2008).
Peak call volume occurred in 2010 when the Quitline was directly promoted on television. The call volume in the month the TV campaign aired was 5.5 times higher than the average monthly call volume in the year 2010. A relatively gradual rise in call volume was found from 2013 to 2016 when the tobacco control policies and campaigns, such as Quitline number included on cigarette packs, a fear-oriented anti-tobacco campaign on mass media, and a tax increase on tobacco was implemented, were introduced sequentially. In that period, the average monthly call volume was about five times higher than in 2007 and 2008.
Continuous efforts to contribute to tobacco control policies and campaigns by the promotion of the Quitline is a most effective approach to raise quitting attempts. Based on the Korean experience, Quitline data may be useful for assessing the impact of tobacco control policies and campaigns in Asian Pacific countries.
尽管韩国已经制定并实施了烟草控制政策,开展了反吸烟运动,但对其戒烟效果的评估仍较为缺乏。因此,通过监测自2006年起运营的戒烟热线的呼叫量,对韩国烟草控制政策和鼓励使用戒烟热线的大众媒体运动的有效性进行了评估。
通过审查政府文件以及法律法规变更历史,对2007年1月1日至2016年12月31日期间的烟草控制政策和大众媒体运动进行评估。评估了戒烟热线同期的来电数量。将实施政策和反吸烟广告时的月平均呼叫量与全年或基准年份(2007年和2008年)的月平均呼叫量进行比较。
2010年,当戒烟热线在电视上直接宣传时,呼叫量达到峰值。电视宣传活动播出当月的呼叫量比2010年的月平均呼叫量高出5.5倍。2013年至2016年期间,随着烟草控制政策和运动的相继实施,如在烟包上标注戒烟热线号码、在大众媒体上开展以恐惧为导向的反烟草运动以及提高烟草税,呼叫量呈现出相对逐渐上升的趋势。在此期间,月平均呼叫量比2007年和2008年高出约五倍。
通过推广戒烟热线持续努力推动烟草控制政策和运动是提高戒烟尝试的最有效途径。基于韩国的经验,戒烟热线数据可能有助于评估亚太国家烟草控制政策和运动的影响。