• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

西班牙公共卫生系统提供的戒烟药物补贴治疗:一项整群随机实用临床试验。

Subsidized pharmacological treatment for smoking cessation by the Spanish public health system: A randomized, pragmatic, clinical trial by clusters.

作者信息

Minué-Lorenzo César, Olano-Espinosa Eduardo, Del Cura-González Isabel, Vizcaíno-Sánchez Jose M, Camarelles-Guillem Francisco, Granados-Garrido José A, Ruiz-Pacheco Margarita, Gámez-Cabero M Isabel, Martínez-Suberviola F Javier, Serrano-Serrano Encarnación

机构信息

Perales del Río Health Center, Dirección Asistencial Centro, Servicio Madrileño de Salud, Madrid, Spain.

Los Castillos Health Center, Dirección Asistencial Oeste, Servicio Madrileño de Salud, Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

Tob Induc Dis. 2019 Sep 5;17:64. doi: 10.18332/tid/111368. eCollection 2019.

DOI:10.18332/tid/111368
PMID:31582953
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6770612/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Research has shown that financing drug therapy increases smoking abstinence rates, although most of these studies have been carried out in the private healthcare setting. The aim of this work is to assess the effect of subsidized pharmacological treatment on smoking cessation rates by the Spanish public healthcare system.

METHODS

A pragmatic, randomized, clinical trial was performed by clusters. Randomization unit was the primary healthcare center and the analysis unit was the patient. Smokers consuming ≥10 cigarettes/day were randomly assigned to an intervention group that received financed pharmacological treatment or to a control group that followed usual care. The main outcome was self-reported or CO-confirmed continuous abstinence at 12 months. The main outcome, continuous abstinence rates (%), were compared between groups at 12 months post-intervention. A model was adjusted using mixed-effect logistic regression.

RESULTS

A total of 1154 patients were included from 23 healthcare centers. In the intention-to-treat analysis, self-reported abstinence after 12 months in the control and intervention groups, respectively, was 9.6% (37/387) and 15.4% (118/767) (gender-adjusted OR=1.75; 95% CI: 1.1-2.8); for CO-confirmed abstinence the corresponding values were 3.1% (12/387) and 6.4% (49/767) (gender-adjusted OR=1.72; 95% CI: 0.7-4.0). Pharmacological treatment use was 35.1% (136/387) in the control group, and 58.3% (447/767) in the intervention group (adjusted OR=4.25; 95% CI: 1.8-9.9).

CONCLUSIONS

Subsidizing pharmacological treatment for smoking cessation increases self-reported or CO-confirmed abstinence rates under realistic conditions in the primary care setting of the Spanish public health system.

摘要

引言

研究表明,药物治疗资助可提高戒烟率,不过这些研究大多是在私立医疗环境中开展的。本研究旨在评估西班牙公共医疗系统提供的药物治疗补贴对戒烟率的影响。

方法

开展了一项实用的整群随机临床试验。随机分组单位是基层医疗中心,分析单位是患者。每日吸烟量≥10支的吸烟者被随机分配至接受药物治疗资助的干预组或接受常规护理的对照组。主要结局是12个月时自我报告或经一氧化碳确认的持续戒烟情况。在干预后12个月时比较两组的主要结局,即持续戒烟率(%)。使用混合效应逻辑回归调整模型。

结果

来自23个医疗中心的1154例患者纳入研究。在意向性分析中,对照组和干预组12个月时自我报告的戒烟率分别为9.6%(37/387)和15.4%(118/767)(经性别调整的比值比=1.75;95%置信区间:1.1 - 2.8);经一氧化碳确认的戒烟率相应值分别为3.1%(12/387)和6.4%(49/767)(经性别调整的比值比=1.72;95%置信区间:0.7 - 4.0)。对照组药物治疗使用率为35.1%(136/387),干预组为58.3%(447/767)(调整后的比值比=4.25;95%置信区间:1.8 - 9.9)。

结论

在西班牙公共卫生系统的基层医疗环境中,为戒烟提供药物治疗补贴可提高自我报告或经一氧化碳确认的戒烟率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ca8/6770612/108b8bbca579/TID-17-64-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ca8/6770612/108b8bbca579/TID-17-64-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ca8/6770612/108b8bbca579/TID-17-64-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Subsidized pharmacological treatment for smoking cessation by the Spanish public health system: A randomized, pragmatic, clinical trial by clusters.西班牙公共卫生系统提供的戒烟药物补贴治疗:一项整群随机实用临床试验。
Tob Induc Dis. 2019 Sep 5;17:64. doi: 10.18332/tid/111368. eCollection 2019.
2
Gender, smoking, and tobacco cessation with pharmacological treatment in a cluster randomized clinical trial.一项整群随机临床试验中的性别、吸烟与药物治疗戒烟情况
Tob Induc Dis. 2024 Feb 15;22. doi: 10.18332/tid/177260. eCollection 2024.
3
WhatsApp embedded in routine service delivery for smoking cessation: effects on abstinence rates in a randomized controlled study.将 WhatsApp 嵌入常规戒烟服务中:一项随机对照研究对戒烟率的影响。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Apr 8;19(1):387. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-6727-z.
4
Proactive tobacco treatment and population-level cessation: a pragmatic randomized clinical trial.主动烟草治疗和人群水平戒烟:一项实用随机临床试验。
JAMA Intern Med. 2014 May;174(5):671-7. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.177.
5
Effectiveness of a stepped primary care smoking cessation intervention: cluster randomized clinical trial (ISTAPS study).一项基于初级保健的分阶段戒烟干预措施的有效性:整群随机临床试验(ISTAPS 研究)。
Addiction. 2011 Sep;106(9):1696-706. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03491.x. Epub 2011 Jul 22.
6
A Post-Discharge Smoking-Cessation Intervention for Hospital Patients: Helping Hand 2 Randomized Clinical Trial.一项针对住院患者的出院后戒烟干预措施:“援手2”随机临床试验
Am J Prev Med. 2016 Oct;51(4):597-608. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2016.04.005.
7
Effectiveness of a telephone-based intervention for smoking cessation in patients with severe mental disorders: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.基于电话干预对重度精神障碍患者戒烟的有效性:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2019 Jan 11;20(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-3106-5.
8
Flexible, dual-form nicotine replacement therapy or varenicline in comparison with nicotine patch for smoking cessation: a randomized controlled trial.灵活的双剂型尼古丁替代疗法或伐尼克兰与尼古丁贴片用于戒烟的比较:一项随机对照试验。
BMC Med. 2016 Jun 7;14:80. doi: 10.1186/s12916-016-0626-2.
9
Integrating smoking cessation into routine care in hospitals--a randomized controlled trial.将戒烟纳入医院常规护理——一项随机对照试验。
Addiction. 2016 Apr;111(4):714-23. doi: 10.1111/add.13239. Epub 2016 Jan 13.
10
Effectiveness of a pharmacist-delivered smoking cessation program in the State of Qatar: a randomized controlled trial.卡塔尔国由药剂师提供的戒烟项目的有效性:一项随机对照试验。
BMC Public Health. 2017 Feb 20;17(1):215. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4103-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Differences in the effectiveness of individual-level smoking cessation interventions by socioeconomic status.个体层面戒烟干预措施的有效性在社会经济地位方面的差异。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jan 27;1(1):CD015120. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015120.pub2.
2
The Latrobe Smoking Support Service: A quantitative study of participants in a regional area.拉特罗布吸烟支持服务:对某地区参与者的定量研究。
Health Sci Rep. 2024 May 6;7(5):e2088. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.2088. eCollection 2024 May.
3
Gender, smoking, and tobacco cessation with pharmacological treatment in a cluster randomized clinical trial.

本文引用的文献

1
Healthcare financing systems for increasing the use of tobacco dependence treatment.用于增加烟草依赖治疗使用的医疗保健融资系统。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Sep 12;9(9):CD004305. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004305.pub5.
2
A Systematic Literature Review of Self-Reported Smoking Cessation Counseling by Primary Care Physicians.初级保健医生自我报告的戒烟咨询的系统文献综述
PLoS One. 2016 Dec 21;11(12):e0168482. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0168482. eCollection 2016.
3
Nicotine receptor partial agonists for smoking cessation.用于戒烟的尼古丁受体部分激动剂。
一项整群随机临床试验中的性别、吸烟与药物治疗戒烟情况
Tob Induc Dis. 2024 Feb 15;22. doi: 10.18332/tid/177260. eCollection 2024.
4
Effectiveness of a Conversational Chatbot (Dejal@bot) for the Adult Population to Quit Smoking: Pragmatic, Multicenter, Controlled, Randomized Clinical Trial in Primary Care.用于帮助成年烟民戒烟的对话式聊天机器人(Dejal@bot)的有效性:初级保健中一项实用、多中心、对照、随机临床试验。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2022 Jun 27;10(6):e34273. doi: 10.2196/34273.
5
Strategies to improve smoking cessation rates in primary care.提高初级保健中戒烟率的策略。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 6;9(9):CD011556. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011556.pub2.
6
Cost-effectiveness analysis of text messaging to support health advice for smoking cessation.用于支持戒烟健康建议的短信成本效益分析。
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2021 Feb 15;19(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s12962-021-00262-y.
7
Impact of the ENSP eLearning platform on improving knowledge, attitudes and self-efficacy for treating tobacco dependence: An assessment across 15 European countries.欧洲戒烟培训与支持计划(ENSP)电子学习平台对改善烟草依赖治疗知识、态度和自我效能的影响:一项涵盖15个欧洲国家的评估
Tob Induc Dis. 2020 May 7;18:40. doi: 10.18332/tid/120188. eCollection 2020.
8
Effectiveness of a chat-bot for the adult population to quit smoking: protocol of a pragmatic clinical trial in primary care (Dejal@).用于帮助成年人群戒烟的聊天机器人的效果:在初级保健中进行实用临床试验的方案(Dejal@)。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2019 Dec 3;19(1):249. doi: 10.1186/s12911-019-0972-z.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 May 9;2016(5):CD006103. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006103.pub7.
4
Trends in Use of Medications for Smoking Cessation in Medicare, 2007-2012.2007 - 2012年医疗保险中戒烟药物的使用趋势
Am J Prev Med. 2016 Sep;51(3):301-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2016.02.018. Epub 2016 Mar 30.
5
Receipt of evidence-based brief cessation interventions by health professionals and use of cessation assisted treatments among current adult cigarette-only smokers: National Adult Tobacco Survey, 2009-2010.2009 - 2010年全国成人烟草调查:当前仅吸卷烟的成年吸烟者接受卫生专业人员基于证据的简短戒烟干预情况及使用戒烟辅助治疗情况
BMC Public Health. 2016 Feb 11;16:141. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-2798-2.
6
Smoking Cessation and Socioeconomic Status: An Update of Existing Evidence from a National Evaluation of English Stop Smoking Services.戒烟与社会经济地位:来自英国戒烟服务全国评估的现有证据更新
Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:274056. doi: 10.1155/2015/274056. Epub 2015 Jul 26.
7
Effects of wages on smoking decisions of current and past smokers.工资对当前和过去吸烟者吸烟决策的影响。
Ann Epidemiol. 2015 Aug;25(8):575-582.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2015.03.016. Epub 2015 Apr 28.
8
A pragmatic, randomized, controlled study evaluating the impact of access to smoking cessation pharmacotherapy coverage on the proportion of successful quitters in a Canadian population of smokers motivated to quit (ACCESSATION).一项务实的随机对照研究,评估戒烟药物治疗覆盖范围对有戒烟意愿的加拿大吸烟人群中成功戒烟者比例的影响(ACCESSATION研究)
BMC Public Health. 2014 May 7;14:433. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-433.
9
Evaluating the effect of access to free medication to quit smoking: a clinical trial testing the role of motivation.评估获得免费戒烟药物的效果:一项测试动机作用的临床试验。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2014 Jul;16(7):992-9. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntu025. Epub 2014 Mar 7.
10
Tobacco control policies specified according to socioeconomic status: health disparities and cost-effectiveness.根据社会经济地位制定的烟草控制政策:健康差异与成本效益。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2014 Jun;16(6):725-32. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntt218. Epub 2014 Jan 4.