Healthcare Center Los Castillos, Madrid Health Service, Alcorcón, Spain.
Healthcare Center Santa Isabel, Madrid Health Service, Leganes, Spain.
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2022 Jun 27;10(6):e34273. doi: 10.2196/34273.
Tobacco addiction is the leading cause of preventable morbidity and mortality worldwide, but only 1 in 20 cessation attempts is supervised by a health professional. The potential advantages of mobile health (mHealth) can circumvent this problem and facilitate tobacco cessation interventions for public health systems. Given its easy scalability to large populations and great potential, chatbots are a potentially useful complement to usual treatment.
This study aims to assess the effectiveness of an evidence-based intervention to quit smoking via a chatbot in smartphones compared with usual clinical practice in primary care.
This is a pragmatic, multicenter, controlled, and randomized clinical trial involving 34 primary health care centers within the Madrid Health Service (Spain). Smokers over the age of 18 years who attended on-site consultation and accepted help to quit tobacco were recruited by their doctor or nurse and randomly allocated to receive usual care (control group [CG]) or an evidence-based chatbot intervention (intervention group [IG]). The interventions in both arms were based on the 5A's (ie, Ask, Advise, Assess, Assist, and Arrange) in the US Clinical Practice Guideline, which combines behavioral and pharmacological treatments and is structured in several follow-up appointments. The primary outcome was continuous abstinence from smoking that was biochemically validated after 6 months by the collaborators. The outcome analysis was blinded to allocation of patients, although participants were unblinded to group assignment. An intention-to-treat analysis, using the baseline-observation-carried-forward approach for missing data, and logistic regression models with robust estimators were employed for assessing the primary outcomes.
The trial was conducted between October 1, 2018, and March 31, 2019. The sample included 513 patients (242 in the IG and 271 in the CG), with an average age of 49.8 (SD 10.82) years and gender ratio of 59.3% (304/513) women and 40.7% (209/513) men. Of them, 232 patients (45.2%) completed the follow-up, 104/242 (42.9%) in the IG and 128/271 (47.2%) in the CG. In the intention-to-treat analysis, the biochemically validated abstinence rate at 6 months was higher in the IG (63/242, 26%) compared with that in the CG (51/271, 18.8%; odds ratio 1.52, 95% CI 1.00-2.31; P=.05). After adjusting for basal CO-oximetry and bupropion intake, no substantial changes were observed (odds ratio 1.52, 95% CI 0.99-2.33; P=.05; pseudo-R=0.045). In the IG, 61.2% (148/242) of users accessed the chatbot, average chatbot-patient interaction time was 121 (95% CI 121.1-140.0) minutes, and average number of contacts was 45.56 (SD 36.32).
A treatment including a chatbot for helping with tobacco cessation was more effective than usual clinical practice in primary care. However, this outcome was at the limit of statistical significance, and therefore these promising results must be interpreted with caution.
Clinicaltrials.gov NCT03445507; https://tinyurl.com/mrnfcmtd.
INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): RR2-10.1186/s12911-019-0972-z.
烟草成瘾是全球可预防发病率和死亡率的主要原因,但只有 1/20 的戒烟尝试由健康专业人员监督。移动健康(mHealth)的潜在优势可以解决这个问题,并为公共卫生系统促进戒烟干预。鉴于其易于大规模扩展到大量人群的特点,以及巨大的潜力,聊天机器人是常规治疗的一个潜在有用的补充。
本研究旨在评估通过智能手机上的聊天机器人进行基于证据的戒烟干预与初级保健中的常规临床实践相比的有效性。
这是一项实用的、多中心的、对照的、随机临床试验,涉及西班牙马德里卫生服务的 34 个初级保健中心。招募年龄在 18 岁以上、在现场咨询中就诊并接受戒烟帮助的吸烟者,由他们的医生或护士招募,并随机分配接受常规护理(对照组 [CG])或基于证据的聊天机器人干预(干预组 [IG])。两个臂的干预都基于美国临床实践指南中的 5A's(即询问、建议、评估、协助和安排),结合行为和药物治疗,并在几个随访预约中进行结构化。主要结局是通过合作者在 6 个月后通过生物化学验证的持续戒烟。结局分析对患者的分配进行了盲法,但参与者对分组分配进行了非盲法。采用意向治疗分析,采用基线观察延续法处理缺失数据,并使用稳健估计量的逻辑回归模型评估主要结局。
该试验于 2018 年 10 月 1 日至 2019 年 3 月 31 日进行。样本包括 513 名患者(IG 组 242 名,CG 组 271 名),平均年龄 49.8(标准差 10.82)岁,性别比例为 59.3%(304/513)女性和 40.7%(209/513)男性。其中,232 名患者(45.2%)完成了随访,IG 组 104 名(42.9%),CG 组 128 名(47.2%)。在意向治疗分析中,IG 组(63/242,26%)的生物化学验证戒烟率高于 CG 组(51/271,18.8%;比值比 1.52,95%置信区间 1.00-2.31;P=.05)。在调整基线 CO 比色法和安非他酮摄入后,未观察到实质性变化(比值比 1.52,95%置信区间 0.99-2.33;P=.05;伪 R=0.045)。在 IG 组中,61.2%(148/242)的用户访问了聊天机器人,平均聊天机器人-患者交互时间为 121 分钟(95%置信区间 121.1-140.0),平均联系次数为 45.56 次(标准差 36.32)。
包括聊天机器人在内的戒烟治疗比初级保健中的常规临床实践更有效。然而,这一结果处于统计学意义的边缘,因此必须谨慎解释这些有希望的结果。
Clinicaltrials.gov NCT03445507;https://tinyurl.com/mrnfcmtd。
国际注册报告标识符(IRRID):RR2-10.1186/s12911-019-0972-z。