• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较干湿刷牙法对儿童去除牙菌斑的效果。

Comparing the effect of dry and wet brushing on dental plaque removal in children.

作者信息

Ansari Ghassem, Torabzadeh Hassan, Nabavi Zeynab Sadat, Hassani Paniz Sheikh

机构信息

Department of Paediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry; Dental Research Center, Research Institute of Dental Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Dental Research Center, Research Institute of Dental Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences; Department of Operative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2019 Jul-Sep;37(3):292-296. doi: 10.4103/JISPPD.JISPPD_71_19.

DOI:10.4103/JISPPD.JISPPD_71_19
PMID:31584031
Abstract

AIMS

This study was aimed to assess the efficacy of wet and dry brushing on cleaning outcome of tooth surfaces.

METHODS

Forty-three children aged 10-12 years were randomly selected and instructed for this brushing project. Each case served as self-control. Each patient was requested to brush through one of the wet/dry techniques for 1 week and other technique on the 2 week. Samples had a washout step using pumice prophylaxis prior to each brushing week. Tooth Cleanliness Index was used to measure the plaque removal level. Two uniform Oral-B toothbrushes were used one for each week through the Modified Stillman technique. Mann-Whitney test was employed along with the Wilcoxon signed-rank test to analyze the data.

RESULTS

The level of brushing efficacy was slightly higher in males with no statistically significant difference between sexes. Remaining plaque measured was higher in wet group with significant difference (7.3 ± 1.7 for dry brushing and 7.6 ± 2.6 for wet brushing) (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Dry and wet brushing did not show a significant difference in their capacity to remove plaque indicating that dry brushing could be considered as an acceptable brushing technique.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估湿刷法和干刷法对牙齿表面清洁效果的影响。

方法

随机选取43名10至12岁的儿童参与本次刷牙项目并给予指导。每个病例均作为自身对照。要求每位患者采用湿刷法或干刷法中的一种刷牙1周,然后在第2周采用另一种方法刷牙。在每个刷牙周之前,样本均有一个使用浮石进行预防性清洁的冲洗步骤。使用牙齿清洁指数来测量牙菌斑清除水平。通过改良Stillman刷牙法,每周使用两支统一的欧乐B牙刷。采用Mann-Whitney检验和Wilcoxon符号秩检验来分析数据。

结果

男性的刷牙效果水平略高,性别之间无统计学显著差异。湿刷组剩余牙菌斑测量值较高,差异有统计学意义(干刷为7.3±1.7,湿刷为7.6±2.6)(P<0.05)。

结论

干刷法和湿刷法在清除牙菌斑的能力上没有显著差异,这表明干刷法可被视为一种可接受的刷牙方法。

相似文献

1
Comparing the effect of dry and wet brushing on dental plaque removal in children.比较干湿刷牙法对儿童去除牙菌斑的效果。
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2019 Jul-Sep;37(3):292-296. doi: 10.4103/JISPPD.JISPPD_71_19.
2
Comparison of irrigation to floss as an adjunct to tooth brushing: effect on bleeding, gingivitis, and supragingival plaque.将冲洗与牙线作为刷牙辅助手段的比较:对出血、牙龈炎和龈上菌斑的影响。
J Clin Dent. 2005;16(3):71-7.
3
Comparison of modified bass, rolling, and current toothbrushing techniques for the efficacy of plaque control - A randomized trial.改良巴氏刷牙法、横向颤动拂刷法和圆弧刷牙法对菌斑控制效果的比较——一项随机试验。
J Dent. 2023 Aug;135:104571. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2023.104571. Epub 2023 Jun 2.
4
Efficacy of three toothbrushes on established gingivitis and plaque.三种牙刷对已患牙龈炎和牙菌斑的疗效。
Am J Dent. 2008 Dec;21(6):339-45.
5
Effectiveness of plaque removal with an experimental chewable brush in children between age 9 and 13 years.使用实验性咀嚼刷清除9至13岁儿童牙菌斑的效果。
Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2018 Dec;19(6):417-421. doi: 10.1007/s40368-018-0376-2. Epub 2018 Oct 15.
6
"You should brush your teeth better": a randomized controlled trial comparing best-possible versus as-usual toothbrushing.“你应该更好地刷牙”:一项比较最佳可能刷牙和常规刷牙的随机对照试验。
BMC Oral Health. 2023 Jul 6;23(1):456. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03127-3.
7
Comparative Efficacy of a Soft Toothbrush with Tapered-tip Bristles and an ADA Reference Toothbrush on Established Gingivitis and Supragingival Plaque over a 12-Week Period.软质锥形刷毛牙刷与美国牙医学会参考牙刷对已患牙龈炎和龈上菌斑的12周疗效比较
J Clin Dent. 2016 Jun;27(2):39-47.
8
Comparison of the clinical effects and gingival abrasion aspects of manual and electric toothbrushes.手动牙刷和电动牙刷的临床效果及牙龈磨损情况比较。
J Clin Periodontol. 2001 Jan;28(1):65-72. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-051x.2001.280110.x.
9
Evaluation of the tooth brushing skills in children aged 6-12 years.6至12岁儿童刷牙技巧评估。
Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2013 Aug;14(4):213-9. doi: 10.1007/s40368-013-0046-3. Epub 2013 Jun 5.
10
Comparative efficacy of a specially engineered sonic powered toothbrush with unique sensing and control technologies to two commercially available power toothbrushes on established plaque and gingivitis.一款具有独特传感和控制技术的特殊设计声波电动牙刷与两款市售电动牙刷在已形成的牙菌斑和牙龈炎方面的比较疗效。
J Clin Dent. 2012;23 Spec No A:A5-10.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative in vitro study of a new silicone mouth swab for soft tissue cleaning under wet and dry brushing conditions.新型硅胶口腔拭子在干湿刷牙条件下用于软组织清洁的体外比较研究。
Sci Rep. 2025 Feb 9;15(1):4837. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-88978-2.
2
Physicochemical Properties of Curen® Filaments Versus Nylon Filaments in Toothbrush Bristles: An In Vitro Study.牙刷刷毛中Curen®细丝与尼龙细丝的物理化学性质:一项体外研究。
Cureus. 2024 Dec 15;16(12):e75767. doi: 10.7759/cureus.75767. eCollection 2024 Dec.