Suppr超能文献

手动牙刷和电动牙刷的临床效果及牙龈磨损情况比较。

Comparison of the clinical effects and gingival abrasion aspects of manual and electric toothbrushes.

作者信息

Mantokoudis D, Joss A, Christensen M M, Meng H X, Suvan J E, Lang N P

机构信息

University of Berne School of Dental Medicine, Switzerland.

出版信息

J Clin Periodontol. 2001 Jan;28(1):65-72. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-051x.2001.280110.x.

Abstract

AIMS

The clinical effects and gingival abrasion aspects of 2 electrical tooth-brushes (Braun Oral-B Plak Control Ultra and the novel development Braun Oral-B Plak Control 3D) were to be compared with conventional manual tooth-brushing.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In a cross-over study, 26 dental student volunteers participated and were assigned to 1 of 3 groups. Following instruction in the use of the electric as well as manual toothbrushes, the volunteers were timed for 2 min each day to apply one electric or the manual toothbrush, respectively, during 3 experimental phases of 2 weeks. No other methods of tooth cleaning were to be performed except the one specified for the respective test period. When brushing manually, the Bass toothbrushing technique was applied. Between each test period, a recovery period of 1 week was allowed during which no oral hygiene was performed at all. At the start and the end of each of the experimental periods, the extension of plaque deposits from the gingival margin in coronal direction was assessed using the Turesky et al. modification of the Quigley and Hein plaque index. Presence or absence of gingival inflammation was evaluated by bleeding and probing (BOP). The extent and severity of gingival abrasions were assessed by use of a modified method of Breitenmoser et al. and adapted by Danser et al.

RESULTS

The plaque-reducing effect was similar in all groups with the same cleaning regime. For that reason, the result of the different experimental phases with the respective cleaning modalities were collapsed. Cleaning with the Braun Oral-B Plak Control Ultra electric toothbrush resulted consistently in the lowest plaque scores when compared to both the Braun Oral-B Plak Control 3D and the manual toothbrush. Although the differences in plaque reduction were statistically significant between cleaning with Braun Oral-B Plak Control Ultra and 3D, they were small and of questionable clinical relevance. No significant differences in plaque reductions were found between manual brushing and any of the 2 electric brushes. Gingival abrasions were least pronounced following brushing with the Braun Oral-B Plak Control 3D electric toothbrush. However, no significant differences in gingival abrasion were encountered following brushing with the Braun Oral-B Plak Control Ultra electric in comparison with the manual toothbrush.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of the present study have shown that in a group of dental students trained in manual brushing technique, where efficacy was similar with the 3 toothbrushes tested, there is no evidence of greater gingival abrasion with either Braun Oral-B Plak Control Ultra or 3D when compared with a manual brush.

摘要

目的

比较两款电动牙刷(博朗欧乐B专业型亮白洁齿牙刷和新型博朗欧乐B 3D亮白洁齿牙刷)与传统手动刷牙的临床效果及牙龈磨损情况。

材料与方法

在一项交叉研究中,26名牙科专业学生志愿者参与并被分配到3组中的一组。在接受电动牙刷和手动牙刷使用指导后,志愿者们在为期2周的3个实验阶段中,每天分别使用一款电动牙刷或手动牙刷刷牙2分钟,每次使用时间均被计时。除了在各自测试阶段规定的刷牙方式外,不得采用其他牙齿清洁方法。手动刷牙时采用巴氏刷牙法。在每个测试阶段之间,允许有1周的恢复期,在此期间完全不进行口腔卫生护理。在每个实验阶段开始和结束时,使用经图雷斯基等人改良的奎格利和海因菌斑指数,评估从牙龈边缘向牙冠方向的菌斑堆积范围。通过出血和探诊(BOP)评估牙龈炎症的有无。采用经丹泽等人改编的布雷特莫斯尔等人的改良方法评估牙龈磨损的程度和严重程度。

结果

在相同的清洁方案下,所有组的菌斑减少效果相似。因此,将不同实验阶段采用各自清洁方式的结果进行了汇总。与博朗欧乐B 3D亮白洁齿牙刷和手动牙刷相比,使用博朗欧乐B专业型亮白洁齿牙刷清洁后,菌斑评分始终最低。虽然博朗欧乐B专业型亮白洁齿牙刷和3D亮白洁齿牙刷在减少菌斑方面的差异具有统计学意义,但差异较小且临床相关性存疑。手动刷牙与两款电动牙刷中的任何一款在减少菌斑方面均未发现显著差异。使用博朗欧乐B 3D亮白洁齿牙刷刷牙后牙龈磨损最不明显。然而,与手动牙刷相比,使用博朗欧乐B专业型亮白洁齿牙刷刷牙后,在牙龈磨损方面未发现显著差异。

结论

本研究结果表明,在一组接受过手动刷牙技术培训的牙科专业学生中,所测试的3款牙刷在功效方面相似,与手动牙刷相比,没有证据表明博朗欧乐B专业型亮白洁齿牙刷或3D亮白洁齿牙刷会导致更严重的牙龈磨损。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验