Glisson Christopher C
Continuum (Minneap Minn). 2019 Oct;25(5):1362-1375. doi: 10.1212/CON.0000000000000786.
"Double vision" is a commonly encountered concern in neurologic practice; the experience of diplopia is always sudden and is frequently a cause of great apprehension and potential disability for patients. Moreover, while some causes of diplopia are benign, others require immediate recognition, a focused diagnostic evaluation, and appropriate treatment to prevent vision- and life-threatening outcomes. A logical, easy-to-follow approach to the clinical evaluation of patients with diplopia is helpful in ensuring accurate localization, a comprehensive differential diagnosis, and optimal patient care. This article provides a foundation for formulating an approach to the patient with diplopia and includes practical examples of developing the differential diagnosis, effectively using confirmatory examination techniques, determining an appropriate diagnostic strategy, and (where applicable) providing effective treatment.
Recent population-based analyses have determined that diplopia is a common presentation in both ambulatory and emergency department settings, with 850,000 such visits occurring annually. For patients presenting to an outpatient facility, diagnoses are rarely serious. However, potentially life-threatening causes (predominantly stroke or transient ischemic attack) can be encountered. In patients presenting with diplopia related to isolated cranial nerve palsy, immediate neuroimaging can often be avoided if an appropriate history and examination are used to exclude worrisome etiologies.
Binocular diplopia is most often due to a neurologic cause. The onset of true "double vision" is debilitating for most patients and commonly prompts immediate access to health care services as a consequence of functional impairment and concern for worrisome underlying causes. Although patients may seek initial evaluation through the emergency department or from their primary care/ophthalmic provider, elimination of an ocular cause will not infrequently result in the patient being referred for neurologic consultation. A logical, localization-driven, and evidence-based approach is the most effective way to arrive at the correct diagnosis and provide the best outcome for the patient.
“复视”是神经科临床实践中常见的问题;复视的症状总是突然出现,常常使患者极度担忧并可能导致残疾。此外,虽然有些复视病因是良性的,但其他病因需要立即识别、进行有针对性的诊断评估并给予适当治疗,以防止出现威胁视力和生命的后果。采用一种合乎逻辑、易于遵循的方法对复视患者进行临床评估,有助于确保准确的定位、全面的鉴别诊断以及为患者提供最佳护理。本文为制定复视患者的诊疗方法奠定基础,包括鉴别诊断的实际案例、有效运用确证性检查技术、确定合适的诊断策略以及(如适用)提供有效治疗。
最近基于人群的分析表明,复视在门诊和急诊科都很常见,每年有85万次相关就诊。对于到门诊就诊的患者,诊断结果很少是严重的。然而,可能会遇到危及生命的病因(主要是中风或短暂性脑缺血发作)。对于因孤立性颅神经麻痹而出现复视的患者,如果通过适当的病史询问和检查排除了令人担忧的病因,通常可以避免立即进行神经影像学检查。
双眼复视最常见的原因是神经系统疾病。真正“复视”的发作对大多数患者来说是使人衰弱的,并且由于功能受损以及对潜在病因的担忧,通常会促使患者立即寻求医疗服务。尽管患者可能首先通过急诊科或其初级保健/眼科医生进行初步评估,但排除眼部病因后,患者常常会被转诊进行神经科会诊。采用合乎逻辑、基于定位且有循证依据的方法是得出正确诊断并为患者提供最佳治疗效果的最有效途径。