Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
Department of Neurology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2017 Dec 1;135(12):1339-1344. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2017.4508.
Diplopia is believed to be a common eye-related symptom. However, to date, there are no available population-based estimates, which are necessary to understand the impact of this disabling symptom on the health care system and to identify steps to optimize patient care.
To describe diplopia presentations in US ambulatory and emergency department (ED) settings.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Ambulatory and ED visits in the United States by patients with diplopia were analyzed in this prespecified secondary analysis of National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey and National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey data collected for a 10-year period (2003-2012). Data were analyzed for the present study from October 6, 2016 to August 18, 2017.
Numbers of ambulatory and ED diplopia presentations were estimated using weighted sample data. Weighted proportions of patient and clinician (ie, ophthalmologists, general practitioners, and specialty physicians) characteristics, diagnoses, and imaging use were calculated.
In total, 804 647 (95% CI, 662 075-947 218) ambulatory and 49 790 (95% CI, 38 318-61 262) diplopia-related ED visits occurred annually; 12.3% of ambulatory visits were primarily for acute- or subacute-onset diplopia. Mean (SD) patient age was 62.1 (20.3) years for ambulatory vs 48.1 (22.3) years for diplopia-related ED visits. Most visits primarily for diplopia were by patients 50 years or older (ambulatory, 79.1% [95% CI, 72.9%-84.2%]; ED, 51.8% [95% CI, 41.0%-62.4%]) who were white (ambulatory, 81.7% [95% CI, 74.8%-87.0%]; ED, 86.1% [95% CI, 77.8%-91.6%]) women (ambulatory, 51.1% [95% CI, 44.1-58.1]; ED, 52.8% [95% CI, 41.6%-63.7%]). Most diplopia-related ambulatory visits were conducted by ophthalmologists (70.4% [95% CI, 62.2%-77.5%]) even when symptoms were acute or subacute (89.0% [95% CI, 81.0%-93.9%]). The most common diagnosis in both settings was diplopia (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification code 368.2). None of the 10 most frequent diagnoses was life threatening in the ambulatory setting, but approximately 16% of diplopia-related ED visits resulted in a stroke or transient ischemic attack diagnosis. Computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging was ordered in 6.2% (95% CI, 2.8%-12.9%) of ambulatory and 59.7% (95% CI, 38.6%-77.7%) of ED visits, primarily for diplopia.
Approximately 850 000 diplopia visits occur in the United States annually; 95% were outpatient visits, and diagnoses were rarely serious in the ambulatory setting but potentially life threatening in 16% of diplopia-related ED visits. Given the low probability of a serious neurologic diagnosis in the ambulatory setting and higher probability in an ED, future cohort studies are needed to define the association of various diagnostic practice patterns, such as imaging, with patient outcomes.
复视被认为是一种常见的眼部相关症状。然而,迄今为止,还没有基于人群的估计数据,这些数据对于了解这种致残症状对医疗保健系统的影响以及确定优化患者护理的步骤是必要的。
描述美国门诊和急诊(ED)环境中的复视表现。
设计、地点和参与者:本研究对美国国家门诊医疗调查和国家医院门诊医疗调查数据进行了二次分析,这些数据是在 10 年期间(2003-2012 年)收集的,分析了患有复视的患者的门诊和 ED 就诊情况。本研究的数据于 2016 年 10 月 6 日至 2017 年 8 月 18 日进行了分析。
使用加权样本数据估计了门诊和 ED 复视就诊的数量。计算了患者和临床医生(即眼科医生、全科医生和专科医生)特征、诊断和影像学使用的加权比例。
每年有 804647 例(95%CI,662075-947218)门诊和 49790 例(95%CI,38318-61262)复视相关 ED 就诊;12.3%的门诊就诊是为了急性或亚急性发作的复视。门诊就诊患者的平均(SD)年龄为 62.1(20.3)岁,而复视相关 ED 就诊患者的平均年龄为 48.1(22.3)岁。大多数主要为复视就诊的患者为 50 岁及以上(门诊,79.1%[95%CI,72.9%-84.2%];ED,51.8%[95%CI,41.0%-62.4%]),为白人(门诊,81.7%[95%CI,74.8%-87.0%];ED,86.1%[95%CI,77.8%-91.6%])女性(门诊,51.1%[95%CI,44.1-58.1];ED,52.8%[95%CI,41.6%-63.7%])。大多数复视相关的门诊就诊由眼科医生进行(70.4%[95%CI,62.2%-77.5%]),即使症状是急性或亚急性的(89.0%[95%CI,81.0%-93.9%])。两种情况下最常见的诊断都是复视(国际疾病分类,第九版,临床修正代码 368.2)。在门诊环境中,没有一个最常见的诊断是危及生命的,但约 16%的复视相关 ED 就诊导致中风或短暂性脑缺血发作的诊断。在 6.2%(95%CI,2.8%-12.9%)的门诊和 59.7%(95%CI,38.6%-77.7%)的 ED 就诊中,主要为复视开具了计算机断层扫描或磁共振成像检查,但这些检查主要用于诊断。
在美国,每年约有 850000 例复视就诊;95%为门诊就诊,且在门诊环境中,诊断很少是严重的,但在 16%的复视相关 ED 就诊中,可能危及生命。鉴于在门诊环境中神经诊断严重的可能性较低,而在 ED 中可能性较高,未来需要进行队列研究,以确定各种诊断实践模式(如影像学)与患者结局的关联。