• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国特应性皮炎的处方模式

Prescribing Patterns for Atopic Dermatitis in the United States.

作者信息

Pona Adrian, Cline Abigail, Kolli Sree, Feldman Steven F., Fleischer Alan F. Jr

出版信息

J Drugs Dermatol. 2019 Oct 1;18(10):987-990.

PMID:31584776
Abstract

Introduction: Introduction: Although future atopic dermatitis (AD) clinical research is intended to improve standard-of-care treatment, how patients are currently treated is not well characterized. The purpose of this study was to determine the most frequent medications prescribed in all ages of AD. Methods: The National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS) is a nationally representative survey of United States office-based ambulatory visits and records demographics, diagnoses, and treatments. This is a cross-sectional study using the NAMCS of all AD outpatient office visits from 2006 to 2015. Patient visits with an ICD-9-CM code for AD (691.8) were collected and analyzed. Frequency tables were created for age, race, providers managing AD, and treatment. Results: Patient demographics of AD visits included 51% male (95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 44-58%), 71% white (65-77%), 19% African American (14-25%), and 10% Asian (6-14%). About 31% (24-37%) of visits were to pediatricians and 27% (22-33%) to dermatologists whereas per physician, dermatologists managed more AD visits than pediatricians. Topical corticosteroids (59%; 52-66%) were the most common class of medications prescribed followed by antibiotics (11%; 6-16%) and second generation antihistamines (6%; 3-10%). The most common topical corticosteroid prescribed in AD was triamcinolone (25% of office visits; 18-31%). Hydrocortisone was the most common topical corticosteroid prescribed to children <1 year of age and children aged 8 to 18, whereas triamcinolone was more common in children 2 to 7 years and adults >18 years. Discussion: Topical corticosteroids were the most frequent prescriptions provided at office-based ambulatory visits whereas antibiotics and second-generation antihistamines were the second and third most common prescribed medications, respectively. Although pediatricians manage more AD visits than dermatologists in total visits, dermatologists manage more AD visits than pediatricians per physician. Characterizing how AD patients are currently treated may build a reference for future clinical research investigating novel standard-of-care treatment in AD. J Drugs Dermatol. 2019;18(10):987-990.

摘要

引言

尽管未来特应性皮炎(AD)的临床研究旨在改善标准治疗方案,但目前患者的治疗方式尚未得到充分描述。本研究的目的是确定各年龄段AD患者最常使用的药物。方法:国家门诊医疗调查(NAMCS)是一项对美国门诊就诊情况具有全国代表性的调查,记录人口统计学信息、诊断和治疗情况。这是一项横断面研究,使用了2006年至2015年所有AD门诊就诊的NAMCS数据。收集并分析了具有AD的ICD-9-CM编码(691.8)的患者就诊情况。创建了关于年龄、种族、治疗AD的医生以及治疗方法的频率表。结果:AD就诊患者的人口统计学特征包括51%为男性(95%置信区间[CI]:44-58%),71%为白人(65-77%),19%为非裔美国人(14-25%),10%为亚洲人(6-14%)。约31%(24-37%)的就诊是看儿科医生,27%(22-33%)是看皮肤科医生,然而就每位医生而言,皮肤科医生管理的AD就诊患者比儿科医生更多。外用皮质类固醇(59%;52-66%)是最常开具的药物类别,其次是抗生素(11%;6-16%)和第二代抗组胺药(6%;3-10%)。AD中最常开具的外用皮质类固醇是曲安奈德(占门诊就诊的25%;18-31%)。氢化可的松是1岁以下儿童和8至18岁儿童最常开具的外用皮质类固醇,而曲安奈德在2至7岁儿童和18岁以上成人中更常见。讨论:外用皮质类固醇是门诊就诊时最常开具的处方,而抗生素和第二代抗组胺药分别是第二和第三最常开具的药物。尽管在总就诊次数上儿科医生管理的AD就诊患者比皮肤科医生多,但就每位医生而言,皮肤科医生管理的AD就诊患者比儿科医生多。描述AD患者目前的治疗方式可能为未来研究AD新型标准治疗方案的临床研究建立参考。《药物皮肤病学杂志》。2019;18(10):987-990。

相似文献

1
Prescribing Patterns for Atopic Dermatitis in the United States.美国特应性皮炎的处方模式
J Drugs Dermatol. 2019 Oct 1;18(10):987-990.
2
Dermatologists and allergists have far more experience and use more complex treatment regimens in the treatment of atopic dermatitis than other physicians.皮肤科医生和过敏症专科医生在治疗特应性皮炎方面比其他医生有更多经验,且使用更复杂的治疗方案。
J Cutan Med Surg. 2001 May-Jun;5(3):211-6. doi: 10.1007/s10227-001-0002-4. Epub 2001 May 17.
3
Treatment of Atopic Dermatitis in the United States: Analysis of Data from the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey.美国特应性皮炎的治疗:来自国家门诊医疗调查的数据分析
J Drugs Dermatol. 2017 Mar 1;16(3):250-255.
4
Real-World Outpatient Prescription Patterns for Atopic Dermatitis in the United States.美国特应性皮炎的真实世界门诊处方模式。
Dermatitis. 2019 Sep-Oct;30(5):294-299. doi: 10.1097/DER.0000000000000520.
5
Atopic dermatitis in children in the United States, 1997-2004: visit trends, patient and provider characteristics, and prescribing patterns.1997 - 2004年美国儿童特应性皮炎:就诊趋势、患者及医疗服务提供者特征与处方模式
Pediatrics. 2007 Sep;120(3):e527-34. doi: 10.1542/peds.2007-0289.
6
The pattern of topical corticosteroid prescribing in the United States, 1989-1991.1989 - 1991年美国局部用皮质类固醇的处方模式。
J Am Acad Dermatol. 1996 Aug;35(2 Pt 1):183-6. doi: 10.1016/s0190-9622(96)90319-9.
7
Time Intervals Until the First Return Office Visit After New Medications.开始使用新药物后至首次回诊的时间间隔。
J Drugs Dermatol. 2020 Dec 1;19(12):1226-1230. doi: 10.36849/JDD.2020.5542.
8
Management of Atopic Dermatitis in Children Younger Than Two Years of Age by Community Pediatricians: A Survey and Chart Review.社区儿科医生管理 2 岁以下儿童特应性皮炎:一项调查和图表回顾。
J Pediatr. 2020 Jun;221:138-144.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2020.02.015. Epub 2020 Mar 11.
9
Off-label prescribing to children in the United States outpatient setting.美国门诊环境下对儿童的非适应证用药。
Acad Pediatr. 2009 Mar-Apr;9(2):81-8. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2008.11.010. Epub 2009 Feb 11.
10
Differences in acne treatment prescribing patterns of pediatricians and dermatologists: an analysis of nationally representative data.儿科医生和皮肤科医生痤疮治疗处方模式的差异:基于全国代表性数据的分析
Pediatr Dermatol. 2008 Nov-Dec;25(6):635-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1470.2008.00790.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Different Approaches to Atopic Dermatitis by Allergists, Dermatologists, and Pediatricians.过敏症专科医生、皮肤科医生和儿科医生治疗特应性皮炎的不同方法。
Dermatol Res Pract. 2021 Dec 3;2021:6050091. doi: 10.1155/2021/6050091. eCollection 2021.
2
Knowledge and Practices of Community Pharmacists in Topical Dermatological Treatments.社区药剂师在局部皮肤病治疗方面的知识与实践
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Mar 12;18(6):2928. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18062928.