Early Start, School of Health and Society, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia.
Early Start, School of Education, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia.
PLoS One. 2019 Oct 4;14(10):e0223607. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0223607. eCollection 2019.
Globally, many schools are replacing traditional classrooms with innovative flexible learning spaces to improve academic outcomes. Little is known about the effect on classroom behaviour. Students from nine secondary schools (n = 60, M age = 13.2±1.0y) were observed via momentary time sampling for a 30 minute period, in both a traditionally furnished and arranged classroom and a flexible learning space containing a variety of furniture options to accommodate different pedagogical approaches and learning styles. The teaching approaches in both conditions were documented. In traditional classrooms the approach was predominantly teacher-led and in the flexible learning space it was student-centred. Students in flexible learning spaces spent significantly more time in large group settings (d = 0.61, p = 0.001), collaborating (d = 1.33, p = 0.001), interacting with peers (d = 0.88, p = 0.001) and actively engaged (d = 0.50, p = 0.001) than students in traditional classrooms. Students also spent significantly less class time being taught in a whole class setting (d = -0.65, p = 0.001), engaged in teacher-led instruction (d = -0.75, p = 0.001), working individually (d = -0.79, p = 0.001), verbally off-task (d = -0.44, p = 0.016), and using technology (d = -0.26, p = 0.022) than in traditional classrooms. The results suggest that the varied, adaptable nature of flexible learning spaces coupled with the use of student-centred pedagogies, facilitated a higher proportion of class time interacting, collaborating and engaging with the lesson content. This may translate into beneficial learning outcomes in the long-term.
在全球范围内,许多学校正在用创新的灵活学习空间取代传统教室,以提高学习成果。然而,关于这种方式对课堂行为的影响却知之甚少。本研究观察了来自 9 所中学的 60 名学生(M 年龄=13.2±1.0y),他们在传统布置的教室和一个灵活的学习空间中分别接受了 30 分钟的瞬间时间抽样观察,该学习空间包含了各种可供选择的家具,以适应不同的教学方法和学习风格。本研究记录了两种条件下的教学方法。在传统教室中,教学方法主要是教师主导的,而在灵活的学习空间中,教学方法是以学生为中心的。在灵活的学习空间中,学生更多地花时间在大组设置中(d = 0.61,p = 0.001),合作(d = 1.33,p = 0.001),与同伴互动(d = 0.88,p = 0.001)和积极参与(d = 0.50,p = 0.001),而在传统教室中,学生则较少参与整体教学(d = -0.65,p = 0.001)、教师主导的教学(d = -0.75,p = 0.001)、独立学习(d = -0.79,p = 0.001)、言语偏离任务(d = -0.44,p = 0.016)和使用技术(d = -0.26,p = 0.022)。研究结果表明,灵活学习空间的多样化和适应性,加上以学生为中心的教学方法,促进了课堂上更多的互动、合作和参与课程内容的时间比例。从长远来看,这可能转化为有益的学习成果。