• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

皮质言语产生网络中编码神经表示的个体差异。

Individual differences in encoded neural representations within cortical speech production network.

机构信息

Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Dartmouth College, 6207 Moore Hall, Hanover, NH 03755, United States.

Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Dartmouth College, 6207 Moore Hall, Hanover, NH 03755, United States.

出版信息

Brain Res. 2020 Jan 1;1726:146483. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2019.146483. Epub 2019 Oct 1.

DOI:10.1016/j.brainres.2019.146483
PMID:31585067
Abstract

When two individuals view the same item, they do not necessarily perceive an item in the same way. If an individual is presented with a stimulus to be recalled later, the information that is encoded is dependent on the features of the stimulus to which one attends. Past studies have shown that, on the group level, verbal and visual information (e.g., words and pictures) are encoded in disparate regions of the brain. However, this account conflates external and internal representational formats, and it also neglects individual differences in attention. In this study, we examined neural and behavioral patterns associated with individual differences in attention to verbal representations-both external and internal. We found that the encoded neural representation of semantic content (meaningful words and pictures) varied as a function of individual differences in verbal attention, independent of the stimulus presentation format. Individuals who demonstrated an attentional bias toward words showed similar multivariate BOLD activity patterns within an a priori speech production network when encoding object names as when encoding pictures of objects. This result indicates that these individuals encode both words and pictures verbally. These effects were not found for non-semantic stimuli (pronounceable non-words and nonsense pictures). Importantly, as expected, no individual differences in neural representation were found in a separate network of regions known to process semantic content independent of format. These results highlight inter-individual divergence and convergence in internal representations of encoded semantic content. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: This study shows how tendencies to attend to word representations is associated with individual differences in encoded neural representations. Individuals who selectively attend to words instead of pictures process semantically meaningful information in language regions of the brain, regardless of whether the information was originally presented as a word or a picture. Though all participants encoded words and pictures similarly in regions that are known to represent domain-general semantic information, only the individuals who were biased towards word representations additionally processed both words and pictures in modality-specific verbal regions. These results demonstrate both the convergence and divergence between individuals that occurs during encoding of meaningful information.

摘要

当两个人观察同一件物品时,他们并不一定会以同样的方式感知该物品。如果一个人被呈现一个稍后要回忆的刺激,那么被编码的信息取决于一个人关注的刺激的特征。过去的研究表明,在群体水平上,言语和视觉信息(例如,单词和图片)被编码在大脑的不同区域。然而,这种解释混淆了外部和内部的表示格式,也忽略了注意力的个体差异。在这项研究中,我们研究了与个体对言语表示的注意力差异相关的神经和行为模式——包括外部和内部的言语表示。我们发现,语义内容的编码神经表示(有意义的单词和图片)随着言语注意力的个体差异而变化,而与刺激呈现格式无关。当以编码物体名称的方式编码物体的图片时,表现出对单词注意力偏向的个体在一个预先设定的言语产生网络内显示出相似的多元大脑活动模式。这一结果表明,这些个体以言语方式编码单词和图片。对于非语义刺激(可发音的非单词和无意义的图片)则没有发现这些效果。重要的是,正如预期的那样,在一个已知独立于格式处理语义内容的区域的分离网络中没有发现神经表示的个体差异。这些结果突出了编码语义内容的内部表示中的个体差异的发散和收敛。 意义:这项研究表明,对单词表示的倾向如何与编码神经表示的个体差异相关。与选择性地关注图片相比,个体更倾向于关注单词,他们会在大脑的语言区域处理语义上有意义的信息,而不论信息最初是以单词还是图片呈现。尽管所有参与者在已知代表一般语义信息的区域中以类似的方式编码单词和图片,但只有对单词表示有偏见的个体还会在特定模态的言语区域中处理单词和图片。这些结果表明,在有意义信息的编码过程中,个体之间既会发生收敛,也会发生发散。

相似文献

1
Individual differences in encoded neural representations within cortical speech production network.皮质言语产生网络中编码神经表示的个体差异。
Brain Res. 2020 Jan 1;1726:146483. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2019.146483. Epub 2019 Oct 1.
2
Individual Differences in the Neural Localization of Relational Networks of Semantic Concepts.个体差异在语义概念关系网络的神经定位中的体现。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2021 Mar;33(3):390-401. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01657. Epub 2020 Dec 7.
3
Evidence for similar patterns of neural activity elicited by picture- and word-based representations of natural scenes.自然场景的图片和文字表示所引起的神经活动模式相似的证据。
Neuroimage. 2017 Jul 15;155:422-436. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.03.037. Epub 2017 Mar 24.
4
Representational similarity analysis reveals commonalities and differences in the semantic processing of words and objects.表象相似性分析揭示了词和物体语义处理的共性和差异。
J Neurosci. 2013 Nov 27;33(48):18906-16. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3809-13.2013.
5
Commonality of neural representations of words and pictures.词语和图片的神经表象的共性。
Neuroimage. 2011 Feb 1;54(3):2418-25. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.10.042. Epub 2010 Oct 23.
6
The Representation of Semantic Information Across Human Cerebral Cortex During Listening Versus Reading Is Invariant to Stimulus Modality.在听和读两种模式下,人类大脑皮层对语义信息的表示在刺激方式上是不变的。
J Neurosci. 2019 Sep 25;39(39):7722-7736. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0675-19.2019. Epub 2019 Aug 19.
7
Dissociating stimulus-driven semantic and phonological effect during reading and naming.在阅读和命名过程中分离刺激驱动的语义和语音效应。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2007 Mar;28(3):205-17. doi: 10.1002/hbm.20272.
8
Episodic encoding and recognition of pictures and words: role of the human medial temporal lobes.图片和文字的情景编码与识别:人类内侧颞叶的作用
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2000 Dec;105(2-3):159-79. doi: 10.1016/s0001-6918(00)00059-7.
9
Neural overlap of L1 and L2 semantic representations in speech: A decoding approach.母语和二语语义表示在言语中的神经重叠:一种解码方法。
Neuroimage. 2017 Nov 15;162:106-116. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.08.082. Epub 2017 Sep 5.
10
An event-related potential investigation of the relationship between semantic and perceptual levels of representation.一项关于表征的语义和知觉水平之间关系的事件相关电位研究。
Brain Lang. 2003 Aug;86(2):300-25. doi: 10.1016/s0093-934x(02)00546-1.

引用本文的文献

1
Math anxiety and science anxiety are associated with spatial cognition and STEM interest in deaf, hard of hearing, and hearing people.数学焦虑和科学焦虑与聋人、听力障碍者及听力正常者的空间认知和对STEM学科的兴趣有关。
NPJ Sci Learn. 2025 Jul 9;10(1):45. doi: 10.1038/s41539-025-00336-z.