• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在听和读两种模式下,人类大脑皮层对语义信息的表示在刺激方式上是不变的。

The Representation of Semantic Information Across Human Cerebral Cortex During Listening Versus Reading Is Invariant to Stimulus Modality.

机构信息

Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute.

Berkeley Institute for Data Science.

出版信息

J Neurosci. 2019 Sep 25;39(39):7722-7736. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0675-19.2019. Epub 2019 Aug 19.

DOI:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0675-19.2019
PMID:31427396
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6764208/
Abstract

An integral part of human language is the capacity to extract meaning from spoken and written words, but the precise relationship between brain representations of information perceived by listening versus reading is unclear. Prior neuroimaging studies have shown that semantic information in spoken language is represented in multiple regions in the human cerebral cortex, while amodal semantic information appears to be represented in a few broad brain regions. However, previous studies were too insensitive to determine whether semantic representations were shared at a fine level of detail rather than merely at a coarse scale. We used fMRI to record brain activity in two separate experiments while participants listened to or read several hours of the same narrative stories, and then created voxelwise encoding models to characterize semantic selectivity in each voxel and in each individual participant. We find that semantic tuning during listening and reading are highly correlated in most semantically selective regions of cortex, and models estimated using one modality accurately predict voxel responses in the other modality. These results suggest that the representation of language semantics is independent of the sensory modality through which the semantic information is received. Humans can comprehend the meaning of words from both spoken and written language. It is therefore important to understand the relationship between the brain representations of spoken or written text. Here, we show that although the representation of semantic information in the human brain is quite complex, the semantic representations evoked by listening versus reading are almost identical. These results suggest that the representation of language semantics is independent of the sensory modality through which the semantic information is received.

摘要

人类语言的一个重要组成部分是从口语和书面语中提取意义的能力,但大脑对听力和阅读感知信息的代表之间的确切关系尚不清楚。先前的神经影像学研究表明,口语中的语义信息在人类大脑皮层的多个区域中得到了表示,而模态语义信息似乎在少数几个广泛的大脑区域中得到了表示。然而,之前的研究不够敏感,无法确定语义表示是否在精细的细节层面上共享,而不仅仅是在粗糙的尺度上。我们使用 fMRI 在两个单独的实验中记录参与者在听或读几个小时相同的叙述故事时的大脑活动,然后创建体素编码模型,以描述每个体素和每个个体参与者的语义选择性。我们发现,在大脑皮层的大多数语义选择性区域中,听和读时的语义调谐高度相关,并且一种模态中使用的模型可以准确地预测另一种模态中的体素响应。这些结果表明,语言语义的表示与接收语义信息的感觉模态无关。人类可以从口语和书面语中理解单词的意思。因此,了解口语或书面文本的大脑表示之间的关系非常重要。在这里,我们表明,尽管人类大脑中语义信息的表示非常复杂,但听力和阅读所引起的语义表示几乎相同。这些结果表明,语言语义的表示与接收语义信息的感觉模态无关。

相似文献

1
The Representation of Semantic Information Across Human Cerebral Cortex During Listening Versus Reading Is Invariant to Stimulus Modality.在听和读两种模式下,人类大脑皮层对语义信息的表示在刺激方式上是不变的。
J Neurosci. 2019 Sep 25;39(39):7722-7736. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0675-19.2019. Epub 2019 Aug 19.
2
"Neural overlap of L1 and L2 semantic representations across visual and auditory modalities: a decoding approach".“视觉和听觉模态下 L1 和 L2 语义表示的神经重叠:一种解码方法”。
Neuropsychologia. 2018 May;113:68-77. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.03.037. Epub 2018 Mar 29.
3
Deep Artificial Neural Networks Reveal a Distributed Cortical Network Encoding Propositional Sentence-Level Meaning.深度人工神经网络揭示命题句级意义的分布式皮层网络编码。
J Neurosci. 2021 May 5;41(18):4100-4119. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1152-20.2021. Epub 2021 Mar 22.
4
Convergence of Modality Invariance and Attention Selectivity in the Cortical Semantic Circuit.在皮质语义回路中,模态不变性和注意力选择性的融合。
Cereb Cortex. 2021 Aug 26;31(10):4825-4839. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhab125.
5
Semantic Representations during Language Comprehension Are Affected by Context.语言理解过程中的语义表示受上下文影响。
J Neurosci. 2023 Apr 26;43(17):3144-3158. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2459-21.2023. Epub 2023 Mar 27.
6
Left perirhinal cortex codes for similarity in meaning between written words: Comparison with auditory word input.左侧嗅周皮层对书面文字之间的语义相似性进行编码:与听觉单词输入的比较。
Neuropsychologia. 2015 Sep;76:4-16. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.03.016. Epub 2015 Mar 18.
7
Neural Mechanisms Underlying Cross-Modal Phonetic Encoding.跨模态语音编码的神经机制。
J Neurosci. 2018 Feb 14;38(7):1835-1849. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1566-17.2017. Epub 2017 Dec 20.
8
The cortical representation of language timescales is shared between reading and listening.语言的皮质代表时间尺度在阅读和听力之间是共享的。
Commun Biol. 2024 Mar 7;7(1):284. doi: 10.1038/s42003-024-05909-z.
9
A Heteromodal Word-Meaning Binding Site in the Visual Word Form Area under Top-Down Frontoparietal Control.顶叶顶间控制下的视觉词形区中的异模态词义绑定位点。
J Neurosci. 2021 Apr 28;41(17):3854-3869. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2771-20.2021. Epub 2021 Mar 9.
10
Spatiotemporal convergence of semantic processing in reading and speech perception.阅读与言语感知中语义加工的时空收敛
J Neurosci. 2009 Jul 22;29(29):9271-80. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5860-08.2009.

引用本文的文献

1
Individual differences shape conceptual representation in the brain.个体差异塑造大脑中的概念表征。
bioRxiv. 2025 Aug 22:2025.08.22.671848. doi: 10.1101/2025.08.22.671848.
2
Functional brain mapping using whole-head very high-density diffuse optical tomography.使用全头型超高密度扩散光学断层扫描进行脑功能图谱绘制。
Imaging Neurosci (Camb). 2025 Jun 20;3. doi: 10.1162/IMAG.a.54. eCollection 2025.
3
The Voxelwise Encoding Model framework: A tutorial introduction to fitting encoding models to fMRI data.体素编码模型框架:将编码模型拟合到功能磁共振成像数据的教程介绍。
Imaging Neurosci (Camb). 2025 May 9;3. doi: 10.1162/imag_a_00575. eCollection 2025.
4
The "Podcast" ECoG dataset for modeling neural activity during natural language comprehension.用于在自然语言理解过程中对神经活动进行建模的“播客”脑电图数据集。
Sci Data. 2025 Jul 3;12(1):1135. doi: 10.1038/s41597-025-05462-2.
5
Asymmetric representation of symmetric semantic information in the human brain.人类大脑中对称语义信息的不对称表征。
Neuroimage Rep. 2025 Feb 9;5(1):100243. doi: 10.1016/j.ynirp.2025.100243. eCollection 2025 Mar.
6
Conversational content is organized across multiple timescales in the brain.大脑中的对话内容是在多个时间尺度上组织起来的。
Nat Hum Behav. 2025 Jun 11. doi: 10.1038/s41562-025-02231-4.
7
A two-dimensional space of linguistic representations shared across individuals.个体间共享的语言表征二维空间。
bioRxiv. 2025 May 23:2025.05.21.655330. doi: 10.1101/2025.05.21.655330.
8
Divergences between Language Models and Human Brains.语言模型与人类大脑之间的差异。
Adv Neural Inf Process Syst. 2024;37:137999-138031.
9
Same Cause; Different Effects in the Brain.相同病因;大脑中的不同效应。
Proc Mach Learn Res. 2022 Apr;177:787-825.
10
Predicting whole-brain neural dynamics from prefrontal cortex functional near-infrared spectroscopy signal during movie-watching.在观看电影期间,从额叶前皮质功能近红外光谱信号预测全脑神经动力学。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2025 May 20;20(1). doi: 10.1093/scan/nsaf043.

本文引用的文献

1
Voxelwise encoding models with non-spherical multivariate normal priors.体素编码模型,具有非球形多元正态先验。
Neuroimage. 2019 Aug 15;197:482-492. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.04.012. Epub 2019 May 7.
2
Toward a universal decoder of linguistic meaning from brain activation.迈向基于大脑激活的语言意义通用解码器。
Nat Commun. 2018 Mar 6;9(1):963. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-03068-4.
3
The Hierarchical Cortical Organization of Human Speech Processing.人类言语处理的分层皮质组织
J Neurosci. 2017 Jul 5;37(27):6539-6557. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3267-16.2017. Epub 2017 Jun 6.
4
Cross-modal representation of spoken and written word meaning in left pars triangularis.左侧三角部中口语和书面语词义的跨模态表征
Neuroimage. 2017 Apr 15;150:292-307. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.02.032. Epub 2017 Feb 14.
5
Same Story, Different Story.同样的故事,不同的版本。
Psychol Sci. 2017 Mar;28(3):307-319. doi: 10.1177/0956797616682029. Epub 2017 Jan 1.
6
Natural speech reveals the semantic maps that tile human cerebral cortex.自然语言揭示了覆盖人类大脑皮层的语义图谱。
Nature. 2016 Apr 28;532(7600):453-8. doi: 10.1038/nature17637.
7
Fourier power, subjective distance, and object categories all provide plausible models of BOLD responses in scene-selective visual areas.傅里叶功率、主观距离和物体类别都为场景选择性视觉区域的血氧水平依赖反应提供了合理的模型。
Front Comput Neurosci. 2015 Nov 5;9:135. doi: 10.3389/fncom.2015.00135. eCollection 2015.
8
Pycortex: an interactive surface visualizer for fMRI.Pycortex:一种用于功能磁共振成像的交互式表面可视化工具。
Front Neuroinform. 2015 Sep 29;9:23. doi: 10.3389/fninf.2015.00023. eCollection 2015.
9
Simultaneously uncovering the patterns of brain regions involved in different story reading subprocesses.同时揭示参与不同故事阅读子过程的脑区模式。
PLoS One. 2014 Nov 26;9(11):e112575. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0112575. eCollection 2014.
10
Selective and invariant neural responses to spoken and written narratives.对口语和书面叙述的选择性和不变的神经反应。
J Neurosci. 2013 Oct 2;33(40):15978-88. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1580-13.2013.