• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

自然分娩和器械助产阴道分娩中的新生儿酸碱平衡

Neonatal acid-base balance in spontaneous and instrumental vaginal deliveries.

作者信息

Livnat E J, Fejgin M, Scommegna A, Bieniarz J, Burd L

出版信息

Obstet Gynecol. 1978 Nov;52(5):549-51.

PMID:31586
Abstract

The acid-base balances of 63 neonates delivered either spontaneously or by the vacuum extractor or low forceps were compared. The outcome was similar in neonates delivered by vacuum extractor or forceps. However, significant differences were noted in the pH and base deficit of infants born by instrumental versus spontaneous delivery. These differences were no longer present when groups with similar duration in the second stage of labor were compared. We conclude that the use of instruments for outlet vaginal delivery carries no additional risk for the fetus.

摘要

对63例经自然分娩、真空吸引器助产或低位产钳助产的新生儿的酸碱平衡情况进行了比较。经真空吸引器或产钳助产的新生儿结局相似。然而,经器械助产与自然分娩的婴儿在pH值和碱缺失方面存在显著差异。当对第二产程时长相似的组进行比较时,这些差异不再存在。我们得出结论,使用器械进行阴道出口分娩对胎儿没有额外风险。

相似文献

1
Neonatal acid-base balance in spontaneous and instrumental vaginal deliveries.自然分娩和器械助产阴道分娩中的新生儿酸碱平衡
Obstet Gynecol. 1978 Nov;52(5):549-51.
2
Cord blood acid-base status in neonates delivered by Silastic vacuum cup extraction: comparison with forceps and spontaneous deliveries.硅橡胶真空杯吸引分娩新生儿的脐血酸碱状态:与产钳分娩和自然分娩的比较
Obstet Gynecol. 1988 Jan;71(1):76-80.
3
A randomized comparison of assisted vaginal delivery by obstetric forceps and polyethylene vacuum cup.产钳与聚乙烯真空吸引杯辅助阴道分娩的随机对照研究
Obstet Gynecol. 1991 Nov;78(5 Pt 1):789-94.
4
Instrumental delivery: clinical practice guidelines from the French College of Gynaecologists and Obstetricians.器械助产:法国妇产科学院临床实践指南。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2011 Nov;159(1):43-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2011.06.043. Epub 2011 Jul 28.
5
Cohort study of Silastic obstetric vacuum cup deliveries: II. Unsuccessful vacuum extraction.硅橡胶产科吸引杯分娩的队列研究:II. 真空吸引失败。
Obstet Gynecol. 1986 Nov;68(5):662-6.
6
Cohort study of silastic obstetric vacuum cup deliveries: I. Safety of the instrument.硅橡胶产科吸引杯分娩队列研究:I. 器械安全性
Obstet Gynecol. 1985 Oct;66(4):503-9.
7
Fear of failure: are we doing too many trials of instrumental delivery in theatre?对失败的恐惧:我们在产房进行的器械助产操作是否过多?
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2008;87(11):1234-8. doi: 10.1080/00016340802443848.
8
A randomised prospective trial of the obstetric forceps versus vacuum extraction using defined criteria.一项使用明确标准对产科产钳与真空吸引术进行的随机前瞻性试验。
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2002 Jul;22(4):344-5. doi: 10.1080/01443610220141227.
9
Obstetric correlates of neonatal retinal hemorrhage.新生儿视网膜出血的产科相关因素
Obstet Gynecol. 1993 May;81(5 ( Pt 1)):688-94.
10
Effect of vacuum extraction on umbilical cord blood acid-base measurements.真空抽吸对脐带血酸碱测量的影响。
J Matern Fetal Med. 1996 Jan-Feb;5(1):11-7. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6661(199601/02)5:1<11::AID-MFM3>3.0.CO;2-W.

引用本文的文献

1
Vacuum extraction: use in a small rural hospital.真空吸引术:在一家小型乡村医院的应用
Can Med Assoc J. 1983 Sep 15;129(6):575-8.