Division of Health Policy and Administration and Institute for Health Research and Policy, School of Public Health, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Division of Community Health Sciences and Institute for Health Research and Policy, School of Public Health, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Transl Behav Med. 2023 Nov 5;13(11):820-825. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibad034.
Public policies have been essential in addressing many of the most pressing public health problems in the USA and around the world. A large and convincing body of multidisciplinary research has established the impacts or effectiveness of public policies, such as smoke-free air laws and nutrition standards, on improving health outcomes and behaviors. Most of this research assumes that because an evidence-based policy is adopted or takes effect, it is implemented as intended. This assumption, however, is often incorrect. Like with clinical guidelines and other interventions, implementation science has an important role to play in promoting the uptake and implementation of evidence-based public policies that promote public health. To realize this potential, there remains a critical need to first establish a common understanding of what public policy is, the role of specific policies in the context of implementation (i.e., is it the evidence-based intervention or the implementation strategy?), and to establish an appropriate methodological foundation for the field of policy implementation science. We recommend that the field must evolve to (i) include policy experts and actors on policy implementation science study teams; (ii) identify theories, models, and frameworks that are suitable for policy implementation science; (iii) identify policy implementation strategies; (iv) adapt and/or identify study designs best suited for policy implementation science research; and (v) identify appropriate policy implementation outcome measures.
公共政策对于解决美国和世界各地许多最紧迫的公共卫生问题至关重要。大量多学科研究证明了公共政策(如禁烟法和营养标准)对改善健康结果和行为的影响或有效性。大多数此类研究假设,由于采用了基于证据的政策或其生效,因此该政策会按预期实施。然而,这种假设往往是不正确的。与临床指南和其他干预措施一样,实施科学在促进基于证据的公共政策的采用和实施方面发挥着重要作用,这些政策可促进公共卫生。为了实现这一潜力,首先需要建立对公共政策的共同理解,确定特定政策在实施背景下的作用(即,是基于证据的干预措施还是实施策略?),并为政策实施科学领域建立适当的方法基础。我们建议该领域必须发展到:(i)在政策实施科学研究团队中纳入政策专家和行为者;(ii)确定适合政策实施科学的理论、模型和框架;(iii)确定政策实施策略;(iv)调整和/或确定最适合政策实施科学研究的研究设计;以及(v)确定适当的政策实施结果衡量标准。