• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Quantifying the future lethality of terror organizations.量化恐怖组织未来的致命性。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Oct 22;116(43):21463-21468. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1901975116. Epub 2019 Oct 7.
2
Verbal attacks on terrorist groups increase violence against civilians.对恐怖组织的言语攻击会增加针对平民的暴力行为。
PNAS Nexus. 2024 Oct 2;3(10):pgae437. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae437. eCollection 2024 Oct.
3
Violence-related Versus Terror-related Stabbings: Significant Differences in Injury Characteristics.暴力相关与恐怖主义相关刺伤的比较:损伤特征的显著差异。
Ann Surg. 2018 May;267(5):965-970. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002143.
4
Organizational structures and practices are better predictors of suicide terror threats than individual psychological dispositions.组织结构和实践比个人心理倾向更能预测自杀式恐怖威胁。
Behav Brain Sci. 2014 Aug;37(4):374-5. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X13003464.
5
Common statistical patterns in urban terrorism.城市恐怖主义中的常见统计模式。
R Soc Open Sci. 2019 Sep 25;6(9):190645. doi: 10.1098/rsos.190645. eCollection 2019 Sep.
6
The group's absence norm and commitment to the group as predictors of group member absence in the next session: an actor-partner analysis.群体的缺席规范和对群体的承诺对下一阶段小组成员的缺席的预测:一个演员-伙伴分析。
J Couns Psychol. 2012 Jan;59(1):41-9. doi: 10.1037/a0025506. Epub 2011 Sep 26.
7
"This is a political movement, friend": Why "incels" support violence.“这是一场政治运动,朋友”:为什么“厌女者”支持暴力。
Br J Sociol. 2022 Mar;73(2):336-351. doi: 10.1111/1468-4446.12923. Epub 2022 Jan 16.
8
[National preparedness for biological mass casualty event: between the devil and the deep blue sea].[国家对生物大规模伤亡事件的准备:进退两难]
Harefuah. 2002 May;141 Spec No:21, 123.
9
A comparative model of the psychological effects on the victims of state and anti-state terrorism.国家恐怖主义和反国家恐怖主义对受害者心理影响的比较模型。
Int J Law Psychiatry. 1989;12(4):281-93. doi: 10.1016/0160-2527(89)90020-4.
10
Leishmaniasis, conflict, and political terror: A spatio-temporal analysis.利什曼病、冲突与政治恐怖:时空分析
Soc Sci Med. 2016 Oct;167:140-9. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.04.038. Epub 2016 May 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Quantifying social media predictors of violence during the 6 January US Capitol insurrection using Granger causality.使用格兰杰因果关系量化 1 月 6 日美国国会大厦骚乱期间社交媒体对暴力行为的预测因素。
J R Soc Interface. 2024 Nov;21(220):20240314. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2024.0314. Epub 2024 Nov 6.
2
Predicting terrorist attacks in the United States using localized news data.利用本地化新闻数据预测美国的恐怖袭击事件。
PLoS One. 2022 Jun 30;17(6):e0270681. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0270681. eCollection 2022.
3
Learning future terrorist targets through temporal meta-graphs.通过时间元图学习未来的恐怖袭击目标。
Sci Rep. 2021 Apr 20;11(1):8533. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-87709-7.
4
Undocumented immigration and terrorism: Is there a connection?非法移民与恐怖主义:二者之间是否存在关联?
Soc Sci Res. 2021 Feb;94:102512. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2020.102512. Epub 2020 Dec 9.

本文引用的文献

1
Population is the main driver of war group size and conflict casualties.人口是战争群体规模和冲突伤亡的主要驱动因素。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Dec 26;114(52):E11101-E11110. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1713972114. Epub 2017 Dec 11.
2
The Changing Nonlinear Relationship between Income and Terrorism.收入与恐怖主义之间不断变化的非线性关系。
J Conflict Resolut. 2016 Mar;60(2):195-225. doi: 10.1177/0022002714535252. Epub 2014 May 26.
3
Quantifying the evolution of individual scientific impact.量化个体科学影响力的演变。
Science. 2016 Nov 4;354(6312). doi: 10.1126/science.aaf5239.
4
Formation of raiding parties for intergroup violence is mediated by social network structure.用于群体间暴力的袭击团伙的形成是由社会网络结构介导的。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Oct 25;113(43):12114-12119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1610961113. Epub 2016 Oct 10.
5
New online ecology of adversarial aggregates: ISIS and beyond.对抗性聚合体的新网络生态:ISIS 及其他。
Science. 2016 Jun 17;352(6292):1459-63. doi: 10.1126/science.aaf0675. Epub 2016 Jun 16.
6
Saving Human Lives: What Complexity Science and Information Systems can Contribute.拯救人类生命:复杂性科学与信息系统能做出的贡献
J Stat Phys. 2015;158(3):735-781. doi: 10.1007/s10955-014-1024-9. Epub 2014 Jun 5.
7
Killing Range: Explaining Lethality Variance within a Terrorist Organization.杀伤范围:解释恐怖组织内部的致死性差异
J Conflict Resolut. 2015 Apr;59(3):401-427. doi: 10.1177/0022002713508927.
8
Quantifying long-term scientific impact.量化长期科学影响力。
Science. 2013 Oct 4;342(6154):127-32. doi: 10.1126/science.1237825.
9
The developmental dynamics of terrorist organizations.恐怖组织的发展动态。
PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e48633. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0048633. Epub 2012 Nov 21.
10
Pattern in escalations in insurgent and terrorist activity.叛乱和恐怖活动升级的模式。
Science. 2011 Jul 1;333(6038):81-4. doi: 10.1126/science.1205068.

量化恐怖组织未来的致命性。

Quantifying the future lethality of terror organizations.

机构信息

Northwestern Institute on Complex Systems, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208.

Kellogg School of Management, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208.

出版信息

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Oct 22;116(43):21463-21468. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1901975116. Epub 2019 Oct 7.

DOI:10.1073/pnas.1901975116
PMID:31591241
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6815138/
Abstract

As terror groups proliferate and grow in sophistication, a major international concern is the development of scientific methods that explain and predict insurgent violence. Approaches to estimating a group's future lethality often require data on the group's capabilities and resources, but by the nature of the phenomenon, these data are intentionally concealed by the organizations themselves via encryption, the dark web, back-channel financing, and misinformation. Here, we present a statistical model for estimating a terror group's future lethality using latent-variable modeling techniques to infer a group's intrinsic capabilities and resources for inflicting harm. The analysis introduces 2 explanatory variables that are strong predictors of lethality and raise the overall explained variance when added to existing models. The explanatory variables generate a unique early-warning signal of an individual group's future lethality based on just a few of its first attacks. Relying on the first 10 to 20 attacks or the first 10 to 20% of a group's lifetime behavior, our model explains about 60% of the variance in a group's future lethality as would be explained by a group's complete lifetime data. The model's robustness is evaluated with out-of-sample testing and simulations. The findings' theoretical and pragmatic implications for the science of human conflict are discussed.

摘要

随着恐怖组织的扩散和日益复杂化,一个主要的国际关注焦点是开发科学方法来解释和预测叛乱暴力。估计一个团体未来致命性的方法通常需要关于该团体能力和资源的数据,但由于这种现象的性质,这些数据被组织本身通过加密、暗网、后门融资和错误信息有意隐瞒。在这里,我们提出了一种使用潜在变量建模技术来估计恐怖组织未来致命性的统计模型,以推断一个组织内在的能力和资源来造成伤害。该分析引入了两个解释变量,它们是致命性的强有力预测因素,并且在添加到现有模型中时会提高整体解释方差。解释变量根据一个团体的最初几次攻击,生成了一个关于其未来致命性的独特预警信号。仅依靠最初的 10 到 20 次攻击或一个团体生命周期行为的前 10%到 20%,我们的模型就可以解释团体未来致命性的大约 60%,而这将通过团体的完整生命周期数据来解释。使用样本外测试和模拟评估了模型的稳健性。讨论了这些发现对人类冲突科学的理论和实践意义。