Park Eun Young, Kim Yeon-Sil, Choi Kyu Hye, Song Jin Ho, Lee Hyo Chun, Hong Sook-Hee, Kang Jin-Hyoung
Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.
Department of Medical Oncology, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.
Radiat Oncol J. 2019 Sep;37(3):166-175. doi: 10.3857/roj.2019.00220. Epub 2019 Sep 30.
This study aimed to investigate neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) as prognostic factors in patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who received concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT).
We retrospectively analyzed 66 patients with locally advanced NSCLC treated with definitive CCRT. Among these patients, 95% received paclitaxel/carboplatin or docetaxel/cisplatin. The median radiation dose was 66 Gy in 33 fractions. The NLR and PLR before/after CCRT were evaluated. The maximally selected log-rank test was used to obtain the cutoff values related to the overall survival (OS).
Patients with high post-CCRT NLR (>3.12) showed worse OS, locoregional progression-free survival (LRPFS), and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) than those with low NLR (2-year OS: 25.8% vs. 68.2%, p < 0.001; 2-year LRPFS: 12.9% vs. 33.8%, p = 0.010; 2-year DMFS: 22.6% vs. 38.2%, p = 0.030). Patients with high post-CCRT PLR (>141) showed worse OS and LRPFS than those with low PLR (2-year OS: 37.5% vs. 71.1%, p = 0.004; 2-year LRPFS: 16.5% vs. 40.3%, p = 0.040). Patients with high NLR change (>1.61) showed worse OS and LRPFS than those with low NLR change (2-year OS: 26.0% vs. 59.0%, p < 0.001; 2-year LRPFS: 6.8% vs. 31.8%, p = 0.004). The planning target volume (hazard ration [HR] = 2.05, p = 0.028) and NLR change (HR = 3.17, p = 0.025) were the significant factors for OS in the multivariate analysis.
NLR change after CCRT was associated with poor prognosis of survival in patients with locally advanced NSCLC. An elevated NLR after CCRT might be an indicator of an increased treatment failure risk.
本研究旨在探讨中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)和血小板与淋巴细胞比值(PLR)作为接受同步放化疗(CCRT)的局部晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者预后因素的情况。
我们回顾性分析了66例接受根治性CCRT治疗的局部晚期NSCLC患者。在这些患者中,95%接受了紫杉醇/卡铂或多西他赛/顺铂治疗。中位放疗剂量为66 Gy,分33次给予。评估了CCRT前后的NLR和PLR。采用最大选择对数秩检验来获得与总生存期(OS)相关的临界值。
CCRT后NLR高(>3.12)的患者与NLR低的患者相比,OS、局部区域无进展生存期(LRPFS)和远处转移无进展生存期(DMFS)更差(2年OS:25.8%对68.2%,p<0.001;2年LRPFS:12.9%对33.8%,p = 0.010;2年DMFS:22.6%对38.2%,p = 0.030)。CCRT后PLR高(>141)的患者与PLR低的患者相比,OS和LRPFS更差(2年OS:37.5%对71.1%,p = 0.004;2年LRPFS:16.5%对40.3%,p = 0.040)。NLR变化高(>1.61)的患者与NLR变化低的患者相比,OS和LRPFS更差(2年OS:26.0%对59.0%,p<0.001;2年LRPFS:6.8%对31.8%,p = 0.004)。在多因素分析中,计划靶体积(风险比[HR]=2.05,p = 0.028)和NLR变化(HR = 3.17,p = 0.025)是OS的显著因素。
CCRT后NLR变化与局部晚期NSCLC患者的生存预后不良相关。CCRT后NLR升高可能是治疗失败风险增加的一个指标。