• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Highly esteemed science: An analysis of attitudes towards and perceived attributes of science in letters to the editor in two Dutch newspapers.备受推崇的科学:对两荷兰报纸社论中读者对科学的态度和看法的分析。
Public Underst Sci. 2020 Jan;29(1):37-52. doi: 10.1177/0963662519878988. Epub 2019 Oct 8.
2
Belief in public efficacy, trust, and attitudes toward modern genetic science.对公众效能的信念、信任以及对现代基因科学的态度。
Risk Anal. 2007 Aug;27(4):921-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2007.00932.x.
3
The Citizen as Contributor-Letters to the Editor in the Austrian Tabloid Paper (2008-2017).作为投稿人的公民——给奥地利小报的读者来信(2008 - 2017年)
Journal Stud. 2020 Jun 1;21(8):1127-1145. doi: 10.1080/1461670X.2019.1702476. eCollection 2020.
4
Evolutionary theory in letters to the editor.致编辑的信中的进化论
Public Underst Sci. 2015 May;24(4):440-9. doi: 10.1177/0963662514563041. Epub 2014 Dec 24.
5
Causal or spurious? The relationship of knowledge and attitudes to trust in science and technology.因果关系还是假象?知识和态度与对科学技术的信任之间的关系。
Public Underst Sci. 2013 Jul;22(5):624-41. doi: 10.1177/0963662511420511. Epub 2011 Oct 18.
6
Assessing policy-makers', academics' and experts' satisfaction with the performance of the Palestinian health research system: a qualitative study.评估政策制定者、学者和专家对巴勒斯坦卫生研究系统绩效的满意度:一项定性研究。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2018 Jul 25;16(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s12961-018-0341-x.
7
Australian letters to the editor on tobacco: triggers, rhetoric, and claims of legitimate voice.澳大利亚致编辑的关于烟草的信件:触发因素、言辞及合法发声的主张。
Qual Health Res. 2005 Nov;15(9):1180-98. doi: 10.1177/1049732305279145.
8
Alcohol research and the alcoholic beverage industry: issues, concerns and conflicts of interest.酒精研究与酒精饮料行业:问题、担忧及利益冲突。
Addiction. 2009 Feb;104 Suppl 1:34-47. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2008.02433.x.
9
Ethics issues in academic-industry relationships in the life sciences: the continuing debate.生命科学领域学术与产业关系中的伦理问题:持续的争论
Acad Med. 1996 Dec;71(12):1291-6. doi: 10.1097/00001888-199612000-00010.
10
Rethinking Giftedness and Gifted Education: A Proposed Direction Forward Based on Psychological Science.重新思考天赋和英才教育:基于心理科学的前进方向建议。
Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2011 Jan;12(1):3-54. doi: 10.1177/1529100611418056.

引用本文的文献

1
An incongruous intervention: Exploring the role of anti-institutionalism in less-educated individual's limited uptake of nutrition information.一个不协调的干预:探索反体制主义在受教育程度较低个体对营养信息接受程度有限中的作用。
Sociol Health Illn. 2022 Feb;44(2):432-450. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.13430. Epub 2022 Jan 18.

本文引用的文献

1
Religiosity predicts negative attitudes towards science and lower levels of science literacy.宗教信仰预测对科学的负面态度和较低的科学素养水平。
PLoS One. 2018 Nov 27;13(11):e0207125. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0207125. eCollection 2018.
2
A science confidence gap: Education, trust in scientific methods, and trust in scientific institutions in the United States, 2014.科学信任差距:2014 年美国的科学教育、对科学方法的信任和对科学机构的信任。
Public Underst Sci. 2017 Aug;26(6):704-720. doi: 10.1177/0963662515617367. Epub 2015 Dec 6.
3
Spiderman and science: How students' perceptions of scientists are shaped by popular media.蜘蛛侠与科学:大众媒体如何影响学生对科学家的看法。
Public Underst Sci. 2017 Jul;26(5):520-530. doi: 10.1177/0963662515615086. Epub 2015 Nov 18.
4
Framing 'fracking': Exploring public perceptions of hydraulic fracturing in the United Kingdom.构建“水力压裂法”:探索英国公众对水力压裂的看法。
Public Underst Sci. 2017 Jan;26(1):89-104. doi: 10.1177/0963662515595159. Epub 2016 Aug 3.
5
Public opinions about human enhancement can enhance the expert-only debate: A review study.公众对人类增强的看法能够推动仅由专家参与的辩论:一项综述研究。
Public Underst Sci. 2016 Jul;25(5):588-602. doi: 10.1177/0963662514566748. Epub 2015 Jan 19.
6
Evolutionary theory in letters to the editor.致编辑的信中的进化论
Public Underst Sci. 2015 May;24(4):440-9. doi: 10.1177/0963662514563041. Epub 2014 Dec 24.
7
Religious beliefs, knowledge about science and attitudes towards medical genetics.宗教信仰、科学知识以及对医学遗传学的态度。
Public Underst Sci. 2014 Oct;23(7):833-49. doi: 10.1177/0963662513492485. Epub 2013 Jul 9.
8
Working the fringes: The role of letters to the editor in advancing non-standard media narratives about climate change.涉足边缘领域:信件在推动气候变化非标准媒体叙事中的作用。
Public Underst Sci. 2013 May;22(4):443-59. doi: 10.1177/0963662511414983. Epub 2011 Jul 26.
9
An attack on science? Media use, trust in scientists, and perceptions of global warming.对科学的攻击?媒体使用、对科学家的信任以及对全球变暖的认知。
Public Underst Sci. 2014 Oct;23(7):866-83. doi: 10.1177/0963662513480091. Epub 2013 Apr 3.
10
Scientific ethics. Final report on Stapel also blames field as a whole.科学伦理。关于斯塔佩尔事件的最终报告也指责了整个领域。
Science. 2012 Dec 7;338(6112):1270-1. doi: 10.1126/science.338.6112.1270.

备受推崇的科学:对两荷兰报纸社论中读者对科学的态度和看法的分析。

Highly esteemed science: An analysis of attitudes towards and perceived attributes of science in letters to the editor in two Dutch newspapers.

机构信息

Leiden University, The Netherlands; Luris, The Netherlands.

Inspectorate SZW, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Public Underst Sci. 2020 Jan;29(1):37-52. doi: 10.1177/0963662519878988. Epub 2019 Oct 8.

DOI:10.1177/0963662519878988
PMID:31591923
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7323765/
Abstract

Understanding attitudes towards science is crucial to safeguard the future of science, the application of its results and the inclusivity of decision-making processes related to science and technology. Most studies focus on attributes of social groups to explain attitudes towards science. In this study, we aim to move the discussion forward by focusing on perceived attributes of science itself by analysing over 300 letters to the editor in two Dutch national newspapers. The authors of these letters express a large degree of trust in science as a source of societal progress, if research is conducted according to a specific set of rules. Yet, they believe that these rules are under attack. The interests of universities as organizations and individual academics as well as the involvement of industry and government in research are perceived as conflicting with these rules. We conclude with recommendations for further research and practice.

摘要

理解人们对科学的态度对于保障科学的未来、科学成果的应用以及与科学技术相关的决策过程的包容性至关重要。大多数研究都侧重于社会群体的属性,以解释人们对科学的态度。在这项研究中,我们旨在通过分析两份荷兰全国性报纸上的 300 多封读者来信,将讨论向前推进,重点关注人们对科学本身的感知属性。如果研究符合特定的一套规则,这些信件的作者表示对科学作为社会进步的源泉有很大程度的信任。然而,他们认为这些规则正受到攻击。大学作为组织的利益、个体学者的利益以及工业界和政府在研究中的参与,被认为与这些规则相冲突。我们最后提出了进一步研究和实践的建议。