IGOID Research Group, University of Castilla-La Mancha, Toledo, Spain.
School of Sport Science, European University, Madrid, Spain.
Eur J Sport Sci. 2020 Aug;20(7):906-914. doi: 10.1080/17461391.2019.1677780. Epub 2019 Oct 17.
The ability to effect a change of direction (COD) when performing high-speed actions is essential in team sports like futsal. Nevertheless, the interaction effect of sports surfaces on this ability remains unknown. This research aimed to analyse the plantar pressures and time performance of 15 youth futsal players when performing CODs on two playing surfaces with different mechanical properties. The shock absorption and vertical deformation of one synthetic flooring surface and one wooden flooring surface were assessed. CODs were evaluated using a modified version of the Agility T-Test, while total time of the test, time of CODs, and plantar pressure in CODs were all recorded. The wooden flooring surface displayed higher values of shock absorption (35.70% ± 2.87%) and vertical deformation (2.77 ± 0.38 mm) compared with the synthetic flooring ( < 0.01). Faster CODs were performed on the wooden flooring than on the synthetic flooring (-0.05 s, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.10 to -0.007, effect size [ES]: 0.07, < 0.05), but no differences in total test time were found ( > 0.05). Finally, no differences in plantar pressures by playing surface were found. In sum, the differences in the mechanical properties of the two futsal surfaces affected the performance of futsal players in the modified agility test. However, these differences were not great enough to generate different plantar pressures on players, probably due to playerś own adaptations.
在进行高速动作时改变方向(COD)的能力在五人制足球等团队运动中至关重要。然而,运动表面对此能力的交互影响仍然未知。本研究旨在分析 15 名青年五人制足球运动员在两种具有不同机械性能的运动表面上进行 COD 时的足底压力和时间表现。评估了一种合成地板表面和一种木质地板表面的冲击吸收和垂直变形。使用改良版敏捷 T 测试评估 COD,同时记录测试总时间、COD 时间和 COD 中的足底压力。木质地板表面的冲击吸收(35.70%±2.87%)和垂直变形(2.77±0.38 毫米)均高于合成地板表面( < 0.01)。运动员在木质地板表面上完成 COD 的速度比在合成地板表面上快(−0.05 秒,95%置信区间[CI]:−0.10 至−0.007,效应量[ES]:0.07, < 0.05),但总测试时间没有差异( > 0.05)。最后,没有发现足底压力因运动表面而异。总之,两种五人制足球表面的机械性能差异影响了运动员在改良敏捷测试中的表现。然而,这些差异还不足以在运动员身上产生不同的足底压力,可能是由于运动员自身的适应。