• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Do Preys Prey on Their Predators? Confusion Over Predatory "Hage-taka" Journals.猎物会捕食它们的捕食者吗?关于掠夺性“鹫鹰”期刊的困惑。
Japan Med Assoc J. 2019 Sep 4;2(2):200-201. doi: 10.31662/jmaj.2019-0011. Epub 2019 Jun 6.
2
An insight into predatory journals.掠夺性期刊研究。
Indian J Public Health. 2020 Jan-Mar;64(1):86-89. doi: 10.4103/ijph.IJPH_249_19.
3
Predatory journal preference in the field of Orthopaedics and Traumatology in Turkey.土耳其骨科与创伤学领域对掠夺性期刊的偏好
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2019 Sep;53(5):390-393. doi: 10.1016/j.aott.2019.05.003. Epub 2019 Jul 4.
4
Predatory Publishing in Orthopaedic Research.骨科学术研究中的掠夺性出版。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2018 Nov 7;100(21):e138. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.17.01569.
5
The surge of predatory open-access in neurosciences and neurology.神经科学和神经病学领域掠夺性开放获取现象的激增。
Neuroscience. 2017 Jun 14;353:166-173. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2017.04.014. Epub 2017 Apr 20.
6
False gold: Safely navigating open access publishing to avoid predatory publishers and journals.假金:安全浏览开放获取出版以避免掠夺性出版商和期刊。
J Adv Nurs. 2018 Apr;74(4):809-817. doi: 10.1111/jan.13483. Epub 2017 Nov 17.
7
'Predatory' open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics.“掠夺性”开放获取:文章数量与市场特征的纵向研究
BMC Med. 2015 Oct 1;13:230. doi: 10.1186/s12916-015-0469-2.
8
Plagiarism in Predatory Publications: A Comparative Study of Three Nursing Journals.掠夺性期刊中的抄袭行为:三个护理期刊的比较研究。
J Nurs Scholarsh. 2019 May;51(3):356-363. doi: 10.1111/jnu.12475. Epub 2019 Apr 5.
9
Potential predatory and legitimate biomedical journals: can you tell the difference? A cross-sectional comparison.潜在的掠夺性和正规生物医学期刊:你能区分出来吗?一项横断面比较。
BMC Med. 2017 Mar 16;15(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s12916-017-0785-9.
10
Analysis of thirteen predatory publishers: a trap for eager-to-publish researchers.十三家掠夺性出版商分析:急于发表论文的研究人员的陷阱。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2018 Jan;34(1):157-162. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2017.1358160. Epub 2017 Aug 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Unsolicited solicitations: identifying characteristics of unsolicited emails from potentially predatory journals and the role of librarians.主动招揽:潜在掠夺性期刊主动招揽邮件的特征及图书馆员的作用。
J Med Libr Assoc. 2022 Oct 1;110(4):520-524. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2022.1554.

本文引用的文献

1
Beware of Predatory Journals: A Caution from Editors of Three Family Medicine Journals.谨防掠夺性期刊:三家家庭医学期刊编辑的警示
J Am Board Fam Med. 2018 Sep-Oct;31(5):671-676. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2018.05.180197.
2
Librarians against scientists: Oncotarget's lesson.图书馆员与科学家的对立:《肿瘤靶向》的教训
Oncotarget. 2018 Jan 19;9(5):5515-5516. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.24272.
3
Stop this waste of people, animals and money.停止这种对人力、物力和财力的浪费。
Nature. 2017 Sep 6;549(7670):23-25. doi: 10.1038/549023a.
4
Predatory journals recruit fake editor.掠夺性期刊招募虚假编辑。
Nature. 2017 Mar 22;543(7646):481-483. doi: 10.1038/543481a.
5
The Pressure to Publish More and the Scope of Predatory Publishing Activities.发表更多论文的压力与掠夺性出版活动的范围。
J Korean Med Sci. 2016 Dec;31(12):1874-1878. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2016.31.12.1874.

猎物会捕食它们的捕食者吗?关于掠夺性“鹫鹰”期刊的困惑。

Do Preys Prey on Their Predators? Confusion Over Predatory "Hage-taka" Journals.

作者信息

Takabe Kazuaki, Nagahashi Masayuki, Butash Ali L, Wakai Toshifumi

机构信息

Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center - Buffalo, New York, USA.

Niigata University - Niigata, Japan.

出版信息

Japan Med Assoc J. 2019 Sep 4;2(2):200-201. doi: 10.31662/jmaj.2019-0011. Epub 2019 Jun 6.

DOI:10.31662/jmaj.2019-0011
PMID:31592226
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6779052/
Abstract

For the last several years, predatory journals have been a topic of discussion in top scientific journals, such as . Predatory journals are problematic because they create public mistrust of scientific publication as a whole by the mass production of non-credible publications with the sole aim of profit. Recently, articles in a Japanese newspaper and online articles exposed domestic institutions for the number of publications in predatory journals, saying that they "abused predatory journals to increase the number of their publications and falsely inflate their academic achievements." We do not subscribe to this point of view because publications in predatory journals do not count as scholarly achievements, and we believe it is an information literacy problem. We feel strongly that it is both important and beneficial for the readers of to be aware of and understand this issue.

摘要

在过去几年里,掠夺性期刊一直是顶级科学期刊(如……)讨论的话题。掠夺性期刊存在问题,因为它们大量炮制不可信的出版物,唯一目的是盈利,这导致公众对整个科学出版行业产生不信任。最近,一家日本报纸的文章和网络文章曝光了国内机构在掠夺性期刊上的发文数量,称它们“滥用掠夺性期刊来增加发文数量并虚假夸大其学术成就”。我们不同意这种观点,因为在掠夺性期刊上发表文章不算学术成果,我们认为这是一个信息素养问题。我们强烈认为,让《……》的读者了解并理解这个问题既重要又有益。