Salisbury C L
Am J Ment Defic. 1985 May;89(6):610-6.
The internal consistency of the short-form of the Questionnaire on Resources and Stress (Holroyd, 1982) was examined using a sample of 189 parents of handicapped and nonhandicapped children. Reliability and factor analysis procedures revealed psychometric weaknesses across scales and a factor structure discrepant with that originally postulated by Holroyd. Eight factors were identified and described. Results were compared with the scale configurations proposed by Holroyd. Positive outcomes were discussed regarding the clinical value of the instrument for assessing stress and resources in families and the 8-factor retention of many, if not all, of the items from the scales of the short form. Suggestions for needed research were presented.
使用189名残疾儿童和非残疾儿童的家长作为样本，对《资源与压力问卷简表》（霍罗伊德，1982年）的内部一致性进行了检验。信度和因素分析程序揭示了各量表在心理测量方面的弱点以及与霍罗伊德最初假设不同的因素结构。确定并描述了八个因素。将结果与霍罗伊德提出的量表结构进行了比较。讨论了该工具在评估家庭压力和资源方面的临床价值以及从简表量表中保留许多（如果不是全部）项目的八因素结构等积极成果。还提出了所需研究的建议。
