Department of Biological and Environmental Science, University of Jyvaskyla, P.O. Box 35, FI-40014, Jyväskylä, Finland.
Structural Bioinformatics Laboratory, Biochemistry, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Åbo Akademi University, FI-20500, Turku, Finland.
Mol Neurobiol. 2020 Feb;57(2):910-925. doi: 10.1007/s12035-019-01775-7. Epub 2019 Oct 8.
Synaptic neurotransmission is generally considered as a function of membrane-embedded receptors and ion channels in response to the neurotransmitter (NT) release and binding. This perspective aims to widen the protein-centric view by including another vital component-the synaptic membrane-in the discussion. A vast set of atomistic molecular dynamics simulations and biophysical experiments indicate that NTs are divided into membrane-binding and membrane-nonbinding categories. The binary choice takes place at the water-membrane interface and follows closely the positioning of the receptors' binding sites in relation to the membrane. Accordingly, when a lipophilic NT is on route to a membrane-buried binding site, it adheres on the membrane and, then, travels along its plane towards the receptor. In contrast, lipophobic NTs, which are destined to bind into receptors with extracellular binding sites, prefer the water phase. This membrane-based sorting splits the neurotransmission into membrane-independent and membrane-dependent mechanisms and should make the NT binding into the receptors more efficient than random diffusion would allow. The potential implications and notable exceptions to the mechanisms are discussed here. Importantly, maintaining specific membrane lipid compositions (MLCs) at the synapses, especially regarding anionic lipids, affect the level of NT-membrane association. These effects provide a plausible link between the MLC imbalances and neurological diseases such as depression or Parkinson's disease. Moreover, the membrane plays a vital role in other phases of the NT life cycle, including storage and release from the synaptic vesicles, transport from the synaptic cleft, as well as their synthesis and degradation.
突触神经传递通常被认为是膜嵌入受体和离子通道对神经递质(NT)释放和结合的反应的功能。这种观点旨在通过将另一个重要组成部分——突触膜——纳入讨论,拓宽以蛋白质为中心的观点。大量原子分子动力学模拟和生物物理实验表明,NTs 分为膜结合和非膜结合两类。这种二元选择发生在水-膜界面,并且与受体结合位点相对于膜的位置密切相关。因此,当亲脂性 NT 沿通往膜埋藏结合位点的路径行进时,它会附着在膜上,然后沿着其平面向受体移动。相比之下,疏水性 NT 注定要与具有细胞外结合位点的受体结合,它们更喜欢水相。这种基于膜的分类将神经传递分为膜独立和膜依赖机制,并且应该使 NT 与受体的结合比随机扩散更有效。这里讨论了这些机制的潜在影响和显著例外。重要的是,在突触处维持特定的膜脂组成(MLC),特别是关于阴离子脂质,会影响 NT-膜结合的水平。这些影响为 MLC 失衡与抑郁症或帕金森病等神经疾病之间提供了合理的联系。此外,膜在 NT 生命周期的其他阶段中起着至关重要的作用,包括从突触小泡中储存和释放、从突触裂隙中运输以及它们的合成和降解。