Leicester Diabetes Centre, Leicester General Hospital, University Hospitals of Leicester, UK.
Diabetes Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester General Hospital, UK.
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2020 Jan;14(1):55-64. doi: 10.1177/1932296819877194. Epub 2019 Oct 9.
Accurately predicting the risk of diabetic foot ulceration (DFU) could dramatically reduce the enormous burden of chronic wound management and amputation. Yet, the current prognostic models are unable to precisely predict DFU events. Typically, efforts have focused on individual factors like temperature, pressure, or shear rather than the overall foot microclimate.
A systematic review was conducted by searching PubMed reports with no restrictions on start date covering the literature published until February 20, 2019 using relevant keywords, including temperature, pressure, shear, and relative humidity. We review the use of these variables as predictors of DFU, highlighting gaps in our current understanding and suggesting which specific features should be combined to develop a real-time microclimate prognostic model.
The current prognostic models rely either solely on contralateral temperature, pressure, or shear measurement; these parameters, however, rarely reach 50% specificity in relation to DFU. There is also considerable variation in methodological investigation, anatomical sensor configuration, and resting time prior to temperature measurements (5-20 minutes). Few studies have considered relative humidity and mean skin resistance.
Very limited evidence supports the use of single clinical parameters in predicting the risk of DFU. We suggest that the microclimate as a whole should be considered to predict DFU more effectively and suggest nine specific features which appear to be implicated for further investigation. Technology supports real-time in-shoe data collection and wireless transmission, providing a potentially rich source of data to better predict the risk of DFU.
准确预测糖尿病足溃疡(DFU)的风险可以显著降低慢性伤口管理和截肢的巨大负担。然而,目前的预测模型无法精确预测 DFU 事件。通常,研究集中在个体因素(如温度、压力或剪切力)上,而不是整体足部微气候。
通过在 PubMed 上搜索报告,系统地进行了综述,没有对开始日期的限制,涵盖了截至 2019 年 2 月 20 日发表的文献,使用了相关的关键词,包括温度、压力、剪切力和相对湿度。我们回顾了这些变量作为 DFU 预测指标的使用情况,突出了我们目前理解中的差距,并提出了应结合哪些具体特征来开发实时微气候预测模型。
目前的预测模型要么仅依赖于对侧温度、压力或剪切力的测量;然而,这些参数与 DFU 的特异性很少达到 50%。在方法学研究、解剖传感器配置和温度测量前的休息时间(5-20 分钟)方面也存在相当大的差异。很少有研究考虑相对湿度和平均皮肤电阻。
非常有限的证据支持使用单一临床参数来预测 DFU 的风险。我们建议应考虑整个微气候来更有效地预测 DFU,并提出了九个似乎有进一步研究价值的特定特征。技术支持实时鞋内数据采集和无线传输,为更好地预测 DFU 风险提供了潜在的丰富数据源。