Suppr超能文献

冠状动脉计算机断层扫描心肌灌注在评估心肌缺血中的应用:SPECT 同时应激方案。

Myocardial Perfusion by Coronary Computed Tomography in the Evaluation of Myocardial Ischemia: Simultaneous Stress Protocol with SPECT.

机构信息

Hospital Universitário Antonio Pedro, Niterói, RJ - Brazil.

Universidade Federal Fluminense, Niterói, RJ - Brazil.

出版信息

Arq Bras Cardiol. 2019 Dec;113(6):1092-1101. doi: 10.5935/abc.20190201.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Functional assessment to rule out myocardial ischemia using coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) is extremely important and data on the Brazilian population are still limited.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the diagnostic performance of myocardial perfusion by CCTA in the detection of severe obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) compared with single-photon emission computerized tomography (SPECT). To analyze the importance of anatomical knowledge to understand the presence of myocardial perfusion defects on SPECT imaging that is not identified on computed tomography (CT) scan.

METHOD

A total of 35 patients were evaluated by a simultaneous pharmacologic stress protocol. Fisher's exact test was used to compare proportions. The patients were grouped according to the presence or absence of significant CAD. The area under the ROC curve was used to identify the diagnostic performance of CCTA and SPECT in perfusion assessment. P < 0.05 values were considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

For detection of obstructive CAD, CT myocardial perfusion analysis yielded an area under the ROC curve of 0.84 [a 95% confidence interval (CI95%): 0.67-0.94, p < 0.001]. SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging, on the other hand, showed an AUC of 0.58 (95% CI 0.40 - 0.74, p < 0.001). In this study, false-positive results with SPECT are described.

CONCLUSION

Myocardial perfusion analysis by CTA displays satisfactory results compared to SPECT in the detection of obstructive CAD. CCTA can rule out false-positive results of SPECT.

摘要

背景

使用冠状动脉计算机断层扫描血管造影(CCTA)排除心肌缺血的功能评估非常重要,而巴西人群的数据仍然有限。

目的

评估 CCTA 心肌灌注在检测严重阻塞性冠状动脉疾病(CAD)中的诊断性能,与单光子发射计算机断层扫描(SPECT)相比。分析解剖学知识对理解 SPECT 成像上存在但 CT 扫描上未识别的心肌灌注缺陷的重要性。

方法

共 35 例患者接受了同时进行的药物应激方案评估。Fisher 确切概率法用于比较比例。根据是否存在严重 CAD 将患者分为两组。ROC 曲线下面积用于确定 CCTA 和 SPECT 在灌注评估中的诊断性能。P<0.05 值被认为具有统计学意义。

结果

对于检测阻塞性 CAD,CT 心肌灌注分析的 ROC 曲线下面积为 0.84[95%置信区间(CI95%):0.67-0.94,p<0.001]。另一方面,SPECT 心肌灌注成像的 AUC 为 0.58(95%CI 0.40-0.74,p<0.001)。在本研究中,描述了 SPECT 的假阳性结果。

结论

与 SPECT 相比,CCTA 在检测阻塞性 CAD 中的心肌灌注分析显示出令人满意的结果。CCTA 可排除 SPECT 的假阳性结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/beae/7021272/dd35c7373190/abc-113-06-1092-g01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验