• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

癌症患者开始系统性治疗后预测急性护理使用的评分的制定与验证。

Development and Validation of a Score to Predict Acute Care Use After Initiation of Systemic Therapy for Cancer.

机构信息

Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Oct 2;2(10):e1912823. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.12823.

DOI:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.12823
PMID:31596490
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6802230/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Emergency department visits and hospitalizations after starting systemic therapy for cancer are frequent, undesirable, and costly. A score to quantify the risk of needing acute care can inform decision-making and facilitate the development of preventive interventions.

OBJECTIVE

To develop and validate a score to predict early use of acute care after initiating systemic therapy for cancer.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A retrospective population-based cohort study was conducted between July 1, 2014, and June 30, 2015. Patients with cancer were eligible if they started a new systemic therapy for cancer, regardless of line of therapy. A total of 12 162 patients in Southwestern Ontario, Canada, formed the development cohort and 15 845 patients in Northeastern Ontario formed the validation cohort. Data analysis was conducted from December 1, 2016, to August 10, 2019.

EXPOSURES

The Prediction of Acute Care Use During Cancer Treatment (PROACCT) score was created based on logistic regression in the development cohort. Combinations of cancer type and regimens were grouped into quintiles based on risk of needing acute care. The score was assessed in the validation cohort.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

At least 1 emergency department visit or hospitalization within 30 days after starting systemic therapy for cancer identified from administrative databases.

RESULTS

Among the 12 162 patients in the development cohort, 6903 were women and 5259 were men (mean [SD] age, 62.9 [12.6] years); among the 15 845 patients in the validation cohort, 9025 were women and 6820 were men (mean [SD] age, 62.9 [12.6] years). Use of acute care occurred within 30 days after initiation of systemic therapy in 3039 patients (25.0%) in the development cohort and 4212 patients (26.6%) in the validation cohort. Three characteristics predicted early use of acute care and formed the PROACCT score: combination of cancer type and treatment regimen, age, and emergency department visits in the prior year (C statistic, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.66-0.69; P < .001). Other characteristics including patient-reported symptoms did not improve performance. In the validation cohort, the PROACCT score was associated with use of acute care (odds ratio per point increase, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.20-1.24; P < .001), had a C statistic of 0.61 (95% CI, 0.60-0.62; P < .001), was reasonably calibrated, and provided net benefit in decision curve analysis.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

The PROACCT score predicted the risk of early use of acute care in patients starting systemic treatment for cancer and could be incorporated at the point of care to select patients for preventive interventions. Future studies should validate the PROACCT score in other settings.

摘要
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7430/6802230/b7aeceaeb228/jamanetwopen-2-e1912823-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7430/6802230/b7aeceaeb228/jamanetwopen-2-e1912823-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7430/6802230/b7aeceaeb228/jamanetwopen-2-e1912823-g001.jpg

重要性

癌症患者开始接受全身治疗后,频繁出现急诊就诊和住院治疗的情况,这不仅不令人满意,还耗费了大量医疗资源。一个可以量化急性护理需求风险的评分可以为决策提供信息,并有助于制定预防干预措施。

目的

开发和验证一个预测癌症患者开始全身治疗后早期需要急性护理的评分。

设计、地点和参与者:这是一项回顾性基于人群的队列研究,于 2014 年 7 月 1 日至 2015 年 6 月 30 日进行。如果患者开始新的全身治疗,无论治疗线数如何,均有资格入选。加拿大安大略省西南部的 12162 名患者组成了开发队列,安大略省东北部的 15845 名患者组成了验证队列。数据分析于 2016 年 12 月 1 日至 2019 年 8 月 10 日进行。

暴露情况

PROACCT 评分是根据开发队列中的逻辑回归创建的。根据需要急性护理的风险,将癌症类型和方案的组合分为五组。在验证队列中评估了该评分。

主要结果和测量指标

从行政数据库中确定癌症患者开始全身治疗后 30 天内至少有 1 次急诊就诊或住院治疗。

结果

在开发队列的 12162 名患者中,6903 名为女性,5259 名为男性(平均[SD]年龄,62.9[12.6]岁);在验证队列的 15845 名患者中,9025 名为女性,6820 名为男性(平均[SD]年龄,62.9[12.6]岁)。在开发队列中,有 3039 名(25.0%)患者在开始全身治疗后 30 天内使用了急性护理,在验证队列中有 4212 名(26.6%)患者使用了急性护理。三个特征预测了早期使用急性护理,并构成了 PROACCT 评分:癌症类型和治疗方案的组合、年龄和前一年的急诊就诊(C 统计量,0.67;95%CI,0.66-0.69;P<0.001)。其他特征,包括患者报告的症状,并没有改善评分的性能。在验证队列中,PROACCT 评分与急性护理的使用相关(每增加 1 分的比值比,1.22;95%CI,1.20-1.24;P<0.001),C 统计量为 0.61(95%CI,0.60-0.62;P<0.001),具有较好的校准度,并在决策曲线分析中提供了净收益。

结论和相关性

PROACCT 评分预测了癌症患者开始全身治疗后早期使用急性护理的风险,可以在护理点纳入该评分,以选择需要预防干预的患者。未来的研究应该在其他环境中验证 PROACCT 评分。

相似文献

1
Development and Validation of a Score to Predict Acute Care Use After Initiation of Systemic Therapy for Cancer.癌症患者开始系统性治疗后预测急性护理使用的评分的制定与验证。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Oct 2;2(10):e1912823. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.12823.
2
A clinical decision instrument to predict 30-day death and cardiovascular hospitalizations after an emergency department visit for atrial fibrillation: The Atrial Fibrillation in the Emergency Room, Part 2 (AFTER2) study.用于预测因心房颤动就诊急诊科后 30 天内死亡和心血管住院的临床决策工具:急诊科心房颤动研究,第 2 部分(AFTER2 研究)。
Am Heart J. 2018 Sep;203:85-92. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2018.06.005. Epub 2018 Jun 12.
3
Predicting Acute Care Events Among Patients Initiating Chemotherapy: A Practice-Based Validation and Adaptation of the PROACCT Model.预测开始化疗的患者的急性护理事件:PROACCT 模型的基于实践的验证和改编。
JCO Oncol Pract. 2023 Aug;19(8):577-585. doi: 10.1200/OP.22.00721. Epub 2023 May 22.
4
Derivation and External Validation of Prediction Models for Advanced Chronic Kidney Disease Following Acute Kidney Injury.急性肾损伤后晚期慢性肾病预测模型的推导与外部验证
JAMA. 2017 Nov 14;318(18):1787-1797. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.16326.
5
Multimorbidity and healthcare utilization among home care clients with dementia in Ontario, Canada: A retrospective analysis of a population-based cohort.加拿大安大略省患有痴呆症的居家护理客户的多重疾病与医疗保健利用情况:基于人群队列的回顾性分析
PLoS Med. 2017 Mar 7;14(3):e1002249. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002249. eCollection 2017 Mar.
6
New Opioid Use and Risk of Emergency Department Visits Related to Motor Vehicle Collisions in Ontario, Canada.新阿片类药物使用与加拿大安大略省机动车碰撞相关的急诊就诊风险。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Nov 1;4(11):e2134248. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.34248.
7
Association of the Trauma of Hospitalization With 30-Day Readmission or Emergency Department Visit.住院创伤与 30 天内再入院或急诊就诊的关联。
JAMA Intern Med. 2019 Jan 1;179(1):38-45. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.5100.
8
Predicting hospital admissions at emergency department triage using routine administrative data.利用常规行政数据预测急诊科分诊的住院人数。
Acad Emerg Med. 2011 Aug;18(8):844-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2011.01125.x.
9
A Clinical Prediction Model to Assess Risk for Chemotherapy-Related Hospitalization in Patients Initiating Palliative Chemotherapy.用于评估开始姑息化疗的患者化疗相关住院风险的临床预测模型。
JAMA Oncol. 2015 Jul;1(4):441-7. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.0828.
10
Development and Internal Validation of a Clinical Risk Score for Treating Children With Mild Head Trauma and Intracranial Injury.发展并验证一种用于治疗儿童轻度头部创伤和颅内损伤的临床风险评分。
JAMA Pediatr. 2017 Apr 1;171(4):342-349. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2016.4520.

引用本文的文献

1
National Trends in the Prevalence of Self-Perceived Overweight Among Adolescents Between 2005 and 2022: Nationwide Representative Study.2005 年至 2022 年间青少年自我感知超重的全国流行趋势:全国代表性研究。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2024 Oct 9;10:e57803. doi: 10.2196/57803.
2
Predicting the Future by Studying the Past for Patients With Cancer Diagnosed in the Emergency Department.通过研究急诊科确诊癌症患者的既往情况来预测未来
J Clin Oncol. 2024 Jul 20;42(21):2491-2494. doi: 10.1200/JCO.24.00480. Epub 2024 May 15.
3
Development of a claims-based risk-scoring model to predict emergency department visits in older patients receiving anti-neoplastic therapy.

本文引用的文献

1
Hospitalization Risk During Chemotherapy for Advanced Cancer: Development and Validation of Risk Stratification Models Using Real-World Data.晚期癌症化疗期间的住院风险:使用真实世界数据开发和验证风险分层模型
JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2019 Apr;3:1-10. doi: 10.1200/CCI.18.00147.
2
A systematic review shows no performance benefit of machine learning over logistic regression for clinical prediction models.系统评价显示,机器学习在临床预测模型中并未优于逻辑回归。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2019 Jun;110:12-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.02.004. Epub 2019 Feb 11.
3
Hospitalisations and emergency department visits in cancer patients receiving systemic therapy: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
基于索赔的风险评分模型的开发,以预测接受抗肿瘤治疗的老年患者的急诊科就诊情况。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jan 17;14(1):1485. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-51981-0.
4
Natural Language Processing Methods to Identify Oncology Patients at High Risk for Acute Care with Clinical Notes.利用临床记录识别急性护理高风险肿瘤患者的自然语言处理方法
AMIA Jt Summits Transl Sci Proc. 2023 Jun 16;2023:138-147. eCollection 2023.
5
Drivers of Emergency Department Use Among Oncology Patients in the Era of Novel Cancer Therapeutics: A Systematic Review.新型癌症疗法时代肿瘤患者急诊就诊的驱动因素:系统综述。
Oncologist. 2023 Dec 11;28(12):1020-1033. doi: 10.1093/oncolo/oyad161.
6
Predicting Acute Care Events Among Patients Initiating Chemotherapy: A Practice-Based Validation and Adaptation of the PROACCT Model.预测开始化疗的患者的急性护理事件:PROACCT 模型的基于实践的验证和改编。
JCO Oncol Pract. 2023 Aug;19(8):577-585. doi: 10.1200/OP.22.00721. Epub 2023 May 22.
7
Nomogram for Predicting Early Mortality after Umbilical Cord Blood Transplantation in Children with Inborn Errors of Immunity.预测先天性免疫缺陷患儿脐带血移植后早期死亡率的列线图。
J Clin Immunol. 2023 Aug;43(6):1379-1392. doi: 10.1007/s10875-023-01505-8. Epub 2023 May 8.
8
Healthcare provider evaluation of machine learning-directed care: reactions to deployment on a randomised controlled study.医疗保健提供者对机器学习指导护理的评估:对一项随机对照研究中部署的反应。
BMJ Health Care Inform. 2023 Feb;30(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjhci-2022-100674.
9
Development and validation of a risk score (Delay-7) to predict the occurrence of a treatment delay following cycle 1 chemotherapy.开发并验证了一个风险评分(Delay-7),用于预测化疗 1 周期后治疗延迟的发生。
ESMO Open. 2023 Feb;8(1):100743. doi: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2022.100743. Epub 2022 Dec 19.
10
Comparison of Oncologist and Model Estimates of Risk for Hospitalization During Systemic Therapy for Advanced Cancer.比较肿瘤学家和模型预测晚期癌症患者系统治疗期间住院风险的差异。
JCO Oncol Pract. 2023 Mar;19(3):e336-e344. doi: 10.1200/OP.22.00422. Epub 2022 Dec 7.
接受全身治疗的癌症患者的住院和急诊就诊情况:系统评价与荟萃分析。
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2019 Jan;28(1):e12909. doi: 10.1111/ecc.12909. Epub 2018 Sep 20.
4
Big Data and Predictive Analytics: Recalibrating Expectations.大数据与预测分析:重新校准期望
JAMA. 2018 Jul 3;320(1):27-28. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.5602.
5
Can Chemotherapy-Related Acute Care Visits Be Accurately Identified in Administrative Data?化疗相关急性医疗就诊能否在行政数据中准确识别?
J Oncol Pract. 2018 Jan;14(1):e51-e58. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2017.023697. Epub 2017 Nov 20.
6
Two Innovative Cancer Care Programs Have Potential to Reduce Utilization and Spending.两项创新癌症护理项目有降低利用率和支出的潜力。
Med Care. 2017 Oct;55(10):873-878. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000795.
7
Predictors of Unplanned Hospitalizations in Patients With Nonmetastatic Lung Cancer During Chemotherapy.非转移性肺癌患者化疗期间计划外住院的预测因素
Oncol Nurs Forum. 2017 Sep 1;44(5):E203-E212. doi: 10.1188/17.ONF.E203-E212.
8
Emergency department use and barriers to wellness: a survey of emergency department frequent users.急诊科的使用情况及健康促进障碍:一项针对急诊科频繁使用者的调查
BMC Emerg Med. 2017 May 10;17(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s12873-017-0126-5.
9
Automated home monitoring and management of patient-reported symptoms during chemotherapy: results of the symptom care at home RCT.化疗期间患者自我报告症状的自动化家庭监测与管理:居家症状护理随机对照试验的结果
Cancer Med. 2017 Mar;6(3):537-546. doi: 10.1002/cam4.1002. Epub 2017 Jan 30.
10
Motives for self-referral to the emergency department: a systematic review of the literature.自我前往急诊科就诊的动机:文献系统综述
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Dec 9;16(1):685. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1935-z.