UMR CNRS 6554 LETG-Angers, UFR Sciences, University of Angers, Angers, France.
World Wildlife Fund, Washington, DC, USA.
Glob Chang Biol. 2020 Mar;26(3):1138-1154. doi: 10.1111/gcb.14865. Epub 2019 Nov 7.
Land-use changes and the expansion of protected areas (PAs) have amplified the interaction between protected and unprotected areas worldwide. In this context, 'interface processes' (human-nature and cross-boundary interactions inside and around PAs) have become central to issues around the conservation of biodiversity and ecosystem services. This scientific literature review aimed to explore current knowledge and research gaps on interface processes regarding terrestrial PAs. At first, 3,515 references related to the topic were extracted through a standardized search on the Web of Science and analyzed with scientometric techniques. Next, a full-text analysis was conducted on a sample of 240 research papers. A keyword analysis revealed a wide diversity of research topics, from 'pure' ecology to sociopolitical research. We found a bias in the geographical distribution of research, with half the papers focusing on eight countries. Additionally, we found that the spatial extent of cross-boundary interactions was rarely assessed, preventing any clear delimitation of PA interactive zones. In the 240 research papers we scanned, we identified 403 processes that were studied. The ecological effects of PAs were well documented and appeared to be positive overall. In contrast, the effects of PAs on local communities were understudied and, according to the literature focusing on these, were very variable according to local contexts. Our findings highlight key research advances on interface processes, especially regarding the ecological outcomes of PAs, the influence of human activities on biodiversity, and PA governance issues. In contrast, main knowledge gaps concern the spatial extent of interactive zones, as well as the interactions between local people and conservation actions and how to promote synergies between them. While the review was limited to terrestrial PAs, its findings allow us to propose research priorities for tackling environmental and socioeconomic challenges in the face of a rapidly changing world.
土地利用变化和保护区(PA)的扩张加剧了全球范围内受保护和不受保护地区之间的相互作用。在这种情况下,“界面过程”(PA 内部和周围的人与自然和跨界相互作用)已成为生物多样性和生态系统服务保护问题的核心。本文献综述旨在探讨有关陆地保护区界面过程的现有知识和研究空白。首先,通过在 Web of Science 上进行标准化搜索,提取了 3515 篇与该主题相关的参考文献,并使用科学计量技术进行了分析。接下来,对 240 篇研究论文进行了全文分析。关键词分析揭示了研究主题的广泛多样性,从“纯”生态学到社会政治研究。我们发现研究的地理分布存在偏差,其中一半的论文集中在八个国家。此外,我们发现跨界相互作用的空间范围很少得到评估,这使得难以明确划定 PA 互动区。在我们扫描的 240 篇研究论文中,我们确定了 403 个被研究的过程。保护区的生态影响得到了很好的记录,总体上似乎是积极的。相比之下,保护区对当地社区的影响研究不足,根据专注于这些问题的文献,根据当地情况,影响差异很大。我们的研究结果突出了界面过程的关键研究进展,特别是关于保护区的生态结果、人类活动对生物多样性的影响以及保护区治理问题。相比之下,主要的知识空白涉及互动区的空间范围,以及当地人民与保护行动之间的相互作用,以及如何促进它们之间的协同作用。虽然该综述仅限于陆地保护区,但它的研究结果使我们能够提出应对快速变化世界中的环境和社会经济挑战的研究重点。