Department of Psychology.
Department of Health Education and Behavior.
Psychol Addict Behav. 2020 Feb;34(1):182-193. doi: 10.1037/adb0000518. Epub 2019 Oct 10.
Behavioral economics provides a general framework to explain the shift in behavioral allocation from substance use to substance-free activities that characterizes recovery from addiction, but it does not attempt to explain the internal processes that prompt those behavioral changes. In this article we outline a novel analysis of addiction recovery based on computational work on value-based decision making (VBDM), which can explain how people with addiction are able to overcome the reinforcement pathologies and decision-making vulnerabilities that characterize the disorder. The central tenet of this account is that shifts in molar reinforcer preferences over time from substance use to substance-free activities can be attributed to changes in evidence accumulation rates and response thresholds in the context of choices involving substance use and substance-free alternatives. We discuss how this account can be reconciled with the established mechanisms of action of psychosocial interventions for addiction and demonstrate how it has the potential to empirically address longstanding debates regarding the nature of impairments to self-control in addiction. We also highlight conceptual and methodological issues that require careful consideration in translating VBDM to addiction and recovery. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).
行为经济学提供了一个通用框架,用于解释从物质使用到物质自由活动的行为分配的转变,这种转变是成瘾康复的特征,但它并没有试图解释促使这些行为变化的内部过程。在本文中,我们概述了一种基于基于价值的决策制定(VBDM)的计算工作的新型成瘾康复分析,该分析可以解释成瘾者如何克服强化病理学和决策脆弱性,这些特征是该疾病的特征。该分析的核心原则是,随着时间的推移,从物质使用到物质自由活动的摩尔强化物偏好的转变可以归因于涉及物质使用和物质自由替代物的选择中证据积累率和反应阈值的变化。我们讨论了如何将该分析与成瘾的心理社会干预的既定作用机制相协调,并展示了它如何具有潜在的能力,从经验上解决长期以来关于成瘾中自我控制受损性质的争论。我们还强调了将 VBDM 转化为成瘾和康复时需要仔细考虑的概念和方法问题。(PsycINFO 数据库记录(c)2020 APA,保留所有权利)。