Acuff Samuel F, Kane Louisa, Stewart Zachary J, Riddle Justin, Daughters Stacey B
Recovery Research Institute, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA.
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2025 Jun;242(6):1351-1362. doi: 10.1007/s00213-024-06732-4. Epub 2024 Dec 18.
Several studies have reported associations between substance use and effort-related decision making, or the degree to which effort expenditure impacts the choice between lower and higher value rewards. However, previous research has not explored effort-related decision making in populations with severe substance use disorder.
Investigate the association between effort-related decision-making and substance use disorder severity.
Adults with substance use disorders (n = 106) enrolled in intensive outpatient treatment completed clinician administered diagnostic interviews and the effort expenditure for rewards task (EEfRT). General linear mixed methods tested the interactive effect of substance use disorder severity and trial-level probability and value on the likelihood of selecting a high-effort choice.
There was a significant interaction between SUD severity and both reward value and reward probability on high-effort choice. The strength of the association between both reward value and probability on high-effort choice significantly increased with SUD severity.
These results support theories of reward sensitivity and behavioral economics and highlight an emerging risk factor that may serve as a useful target for treatment.
多项研究报告了物质使用与努力相关决策之间的关联,即努力付出程度对低价值和高价值奖励之间选择的影响程度。然而,先前的研究尚未探讨严重物质使用障碍人群中的努力相关决策。
研究努力相关决策与物质使用障碍严重程度之间的关联。
参加强化门诊治疗的患有物质使用障碍的成年人(n = 106)完成了临床医生进行的诊断访谈和奖励任务的努力付出(EEfRT)。通用线性混合方法测试了物质使用障碍严重程度与试验水平概率和价值对选择高努力选择可能性的交互作用。
物质使用障碍严重程度与高努力选择的奖励价值和奖励概率之间存在显著交互作用。高努力选择的奖励价值和概率之间的关联强度随着物质使用障碍严重程度的增加而显著增加。
这些结果支持奖励敏感性和行为经济学理论,并突出了一个新出现的风险因素,该因素可能成为治疗的有用靶点。