Department of Genetics, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602.
Department of Biological Sciences, Salisbury University, Salisbury, MD 21801.
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2019 Dec;18(4):ar48. doi: 10.1187/cbe.19-01-0010.
Not all instructors implement active-learning strategies in a way that maximizes student outcomes. One potential explanation for variation in active-learning effectiveness is variation in the teaching knowledge an instructor draws upon. Guided by theoretical frameworks of pedagogical content knowledge and pedagogical knowledge, this study investigated the teaching knowledge instructors used in planning, implementing, and reflecting on active-learning lessons in large courses. We used a preinstruction interview, video footage of a target class session, and a postinstruction interview with stimulated recall to elicit the teaching knowledge participants used. We then conducted qualitative content analysis to describe and contrast teaching knowledge employed by instructors implementing active learning that required students to generate their own understandings (i.e., generative instruction) and active learning largely focused on activity and recall (i.e., active instruction). Participants engaging in generative instruction exhibited teaching knowledge distinct from that of participants focused on activity. Those using generative instruction drew on pedagogical knowledge to design lessons focused on students generating reasoning; integrated pedagogical content knowledge and pedagogical knowledge to plan lessons to target student difficulties; and created opportunities to develop new pedagogical content knowledge while teaching. This work generated hypotheses about the teaching knowledge necessary for effective, generative active-learning instruction.
并非所有教师都以最大限度提高学生成果的方式实施主动学习策略。主动学习效果存在差异的一个潜在解释是教师所依据的教学知识存在差异。本研究以教学内容知识和教学法知识的理论框架为指导,调查了教师在规划、实施和反思大型课程中的主动学习课程时所使用的教学知识。我们使用了课前访谈、目标课堂教学录像和课后带提示回忆的访谈,以引出参与者使用的教学知识。然后,我们进行了定性内容分析,以描述和对比实施需要学生生成自己理解的主动学习(即生成性教学)和主要关注活动和回忆的主动学习(即活动性教学)的教师所采用的教学知识。从事生成性教学的参与者表现出的教学知识与专注于活动的参与者不同。那些使用生成性教学的人利用教学法知识来设计注重学生推理生成的课程;将教学内容知识和教学法知识整合起来,计划针对学生困难的课程;并在教学过程中创造发展新的教学内容知识的机会。这项工作提出了关于有效生成性主动学习教学所需教学知识的假设。