• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

“你这么做的背后是怎么想的?”探究生物教师运用课堂话语的原因。

"What's Your Thinking behind That?" Exploring Why Biology Instructors Use Classroom Discourse.

作者信息

Donham Cristine, Andrews Tessa C

机构信息

Department of Genetics, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, USA.

出版信息

J Microbiol Biol Educ. 2023 Apr 20;24(2). doi: 10.1128/jmbe.00132-22. eCollection 2023 Aug.

DOI:10.1128/jmbe.00132-22
PMID:37614872
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10443393/
Abstract

Instructor discourse, defined as verbal interactions with students in the classroom, can play an important role in student learning. Instructors who use dialogic discourse invite students to develop their own ideas, and both students and the instructor share ideas in back-and-forth exchanges. This type of discourse is well-suited to facilitate deep learning for students but is rare in undergraduate biology classrooms. Understanding the reasoning that underlies the use of dialogic discourse can inform teaching professional development for instructors who are learning to use discourse to support student learning. Through classroom video recordings to identify dialogic discourse and stimulated recall interviews to elicit instructor reasoning, we investigated why undergraduate biology instructors used dialogic discourse in active-learning lessons. Using inductive and deductive qualitative analysis of interview transcripts, we identified and characterized seven reasons that instructors used dialogic discourse, including three aligned with a theoretical framework of student cognitive engagement and four that emerged from our data set. In addition to aiming to prompt generative cognitive engagement in 34% of instances of dialogic discourse, instructors used dialogic discourse to prompt activity, supply information, provide feedback, decipher student thinking, leverage student thinking, and cue students to make connections. Reasoning varied across different types of dialogic discourse. These findings provide valuable insights that can inform research, teaching professional development, and individual instructors' reflections.

摘要

教师话语,定义为在课堂上与学生的言语互动,在学生学习中可以发挥重要作用。使用对话式话语的教师会邀请学生发展自己的想法,学生和教师在来回交流中分享想法。这种话语类型非常适合促进学生的深度学习,但在本科生物学课堂中很少见。理解对话式话语使用背后的推理可以为那些正在学习使用话语来支持学生学习的教师的教学专业发展提供参考。通过课堂录像来识别对话式话语,并通过激发回忆访谈来引出教师的推理,我们调查了本科生物学教师在主动学习课程中使用对话式话语的原因。通过对访谈记录进行归纳和演绎定性分析,我们确定并描述了教师使用对话式话语的七个原因,其中三个与学生认知参与的理论框架一致,另外四个是从我们的数据集中出现的。除了在34%的对话式话语实例中旨在促使产生性认知参与外,教师使用对话式话语来促使活动、提供信息、提供反馈、解读学生思维、利用学生思维以及提示学生建立联系。不同类型的对话式话语推理各不相同。这些发现提供了有价值的见解,可以为研究、教学专业发展和个别教师的反思提供参考。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8705/10443393/f55f4d3ebba0/jmbe.00132-22-f001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8705/10443393/f55f4d3ebba0/jmbe.00132-22-f001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8705/10443393/f55f4d3ebba0/jmbe.00132-22-f001.jpg

相似文献

1
"What's Your Thinking behind That?" Exploring Why Biology Instructors Use Classroom Discourse.“你这么做的背后是怎么想的?”探究生物教师运用课堂话语的原因。
J Microbiol Biol Educ. 2023 Apr 20;24(2). doi: 10.1128/jmbe.00132-22. eCollection 2023 Aug.
2
Look Who's Talking: Teaching and Discourse Practices across Discipline, Position, Experience, and Class Size in STEM College Classrooms.看看是谁在说话:理工科大学课堂中跨学科、职位、经验和班级规模的教学与话语实践
Bioscience. 2021 Aug 4;71(10):1063-1078. doi: 10.1093/biosci/biab077. eCollection 2021 Oct.
3
Pedagogical knowledge for active-learning instruction in large undergraduate biology courses: a large-scale qualitative investigation of instructor thinking.大型本科生物学课程中主动学习教学的教学知识:对教师思维的大规模定性研究
Int J STEM Educ. 2018;5(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s40594-018-0112-9. Epub 2018 Apr 12.
4
Student Perceptions of Instructor Supportiveness: What Characteristics Make a Difference?学生对教师支持度的感知:哪些特征有影响?
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2021 Jun;20(2):ar29. doi: 10.1187/cbe.20-10-0238.
5
What's in a Name? The Importance of Students Perceiving That an Instructor Knows Their Names in a High-Enrollment Biology Classroom.名字的意义:在一个高人数生物学课堂中,让学生感到教师了解他们的名字的重要性。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2017 Spring;16(1). doi: 10.1187/cbe.16-08-0265.
6
Student Thinking in the Professional Development of College Biology Instructors: An Analysis through the Lens of Sociocultural Theory.大学生物学教师专业发展中的学生思维:社会文化理论视角的分析。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2022 Jun;21(2):ar30. doi: 10.1187/cbe.21-01-0003.
7
Let Students Work: Analysis of the Role of Differing Facilitation on Student Engagement in a Large Stadium-Style Lecture Hall.让学生自主学习:分析在大型体育场式讲堂中不同引导方式对学生参与度的作用。
J Chem Educ. 2023 Nov 1;100(11):4237-4248. doi: 10.1021/acs.jchemed.3c00750. eCollection 2023 Nov 14.
8
Teaching Autistic Adolescents and Young Adults to Drive: Perspectives of Specialized Driving Instructors.教自闭症青少年和青年驾驶:专业驾驶教练的观点。
Autism Adulthood. 2019 Sep 1;1(3):202-209. doi: 10.1089/aut.2018.0054. Epub 2019 Sep 11.
9
Utilizing communication strategies to enhance reflective learning in Ethiopian EFL classrooms.运用沟通策略提升埃塞俄比亚英语外语课堂中的反思性学习。
Heliyon. 2024 Jun 7;10(13):e32585. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e32585. eCollection 2024 Jul 15.
10
Student and educator experiences of maternal-child simulation-based learning: a systematic review of qualitative evidence protocol.基于母婴模拟学习的学生和教育工作者体验:定性证据协议的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):14-26. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1694.

引用本文的文献

1
Development of the Follow-Up Discourse Observation Protocol (FUDOP) for Characterizing Instructor Active Learning Follow-Up Behaviors.用于描述教师主动学习跟进行为的跟进话语观察协议(FUDOP)的开发。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2025 Jun 1;24(2):ar20. doi: 10.1187/cbe.24-08-0207.

本文引用的文献

1
Look Who's Talking: Teaching and Discourse Practices across Discipline, Position, Experience, and Class Size in STEM College Classrooms.看看是谁在说话:理工科大学课堂中跨学科、职位、经验和班级规模的教学与话语实践
Bioscience. 2021 Aug 4;71(10):1063-1078. doi: 10.1093/biosci/biab077. eCollection 2021 Oct.
2
Exploring the Relationship between Teacher Knowledge and Active-Learning Implementation in Large College Biology Courses.探索大学大型生物学课程中教师知识与主动学习实施之间的关系。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2019 Dec;18(4):ar48. doi: 10.1187/cbe.19-01-0010.
3
The Classroom Discourse Observation Protocol (CDOP): A quantitative method for characterizing teacher discourse moves in undergraduate STEM learning environments.
课堂话语观察协议(CDOP):一种用于描述本科 STEM 学习环境中教师话语行为的定量方法。
PLoS One. 2019 Jul 17;14(7):e0219019. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0219019. eCollection 2019.
4
Can I Have Your Recipe? Using a Fidelity of Implementation (FOI) Framework to Identify the Key Ingredients of Formative Assessment for Learning.能否分享一下你的配方?利用实施保真度(FOI)框架识别促进学习的形成性评估的关键要素。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2018 Dec;17(4):es16. doi: 10.1187/cbe.18-02-0029.
5
Fidelity of Implementation: An Overlooked Yet Critical Construct to Establish Effectiveness of Evidence-Based Instructional Practices.实施保真度:一个被忽视但至关重要的构建,用于建立基于证据的教学实践的有效性。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2017 Spring;16(1). doi: 10.1187/cbe.16-03-0113.