Suppr超能文献

乳腺癌前哨淋巴结活检中,对比增强超声联合蓝染料与吲哚菁绿荧光联合蓝染料的初步研究。

Preliminary study of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in combination with blue dye vs. indocyanine green fluorescence, in combination with blue dye for sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer.

机构信息

Department of Breast Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, 100730, People's Republic of China.

Department of Ultrasound, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, 100730, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

BMC Cancer. 2019 Oct 11;19(1):939. doi: 10.1186/s12885-019-6165-4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

This preliminary study aimed to examine the feasibility of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) using contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) vs. indocyanine green fluorescence (ICG), combined with blue dye in patients with breast cancer.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study of consecutive female patients with invasive stage I-III (based on pre-operative physical examination and imaging) primary breast cancer at the Peking Union Medical College Hospital between 01/2013 and 01/2015 who underwent preoperative SLNB by ICG + blue dye or CEUS + blue dye. The numbers of detected SLNs, detection rates, and recurrence-free survival (RFS) rates were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

A total of 443 patients were included. The detection rates of SLNs in the CEUS + blue dye and ICG + blue dye groups were 98.4 and 98.1%, respectively (P = 0.814). The average numbers of SLNs detected per patient showed no significant difference between the two groups (3.06 ± 1.33 and 3.12 ± 1.31 in the CEUS + blue dye and ICG + blue dye groups, respectively; P = 0.659). After a median follow-up of 46 months, five patients in the CEUS + blue dye group and 15 in the ICG + blue dye group had recurrence. RFS rates showed no significant difference (P = 0.55).

CONCLUSION

This preliminary study suggests that CEUS + blue dye and ICG + blue dye are both feasible for SLN detection in breast cancer.

摘要

背景

本初步研究旨在探讨对比增强超声(CEUS)联合蓝染料与吲哚菁绿荧光(ICG)联合蓝染料在乳腺癌患者前哨淋巴结活检(SLNB)中的可行性。

方法

这是一项回顾性研究,纳入了 2013 年 1 月至 2015 年 1 月期间在中国医学科学院北京协和医院接受 ICG 联合蓝染料或 CEUS 联合蓝染料术前 SLNB 的连续女性浸润性 I-III 期(基于术前体格检查和影像学检查)原发性乳腺癌患者。比较两组患者 SLN 的检出数量、检出率和无复发生存率(RFS)。

结果

共纳入 443 例患者。CEUS 联合蓝染料和 ICG 联合蓝染料组 SLN 的检出率分别为 98.4%和 98.1%(P=0.814)。两组患者平均检出 SLN 数量无显著差异(CEUS 联合蓝染料组和 ICG 联合蓝染料组分别为 3.06±1.33 和 3.12±1.31;P=0.659)。中位随访 46 个月后,CEUS 联合蓝染料组 5 例和 ICG 联合蓝染料组 15 例患者复发。RFS 率无显著差异(P=0.55)。

结论

本初步研究表明,CEUS 联合蓝染料和 ICG 联合蓝染料在乳腺癌 SLN 检测中均可行。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/561c/6787996/3c157f31335f/12885_2019_6165_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验