Ko Kwang Jin, Kim Sung Jin, Cho Sung Tae
Department of Urology, Hallym University Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Int Neurourol J. 2019 Sep;23(3):185-194. doi: 10.5213/inj.1938108.054. Epub 2019 Sep 30.
The management of postprostatectomy urinary incontinence (PPI) is still challenging for urologists. In recent decades, various kinds of male sling system have been developed and introduced; however, they have not yet shown as good a result as that of artificial urinary sphincter (AUS). However, a male sling is still in an important position because patients have a high demand for sling implantation, and it can allow the avoidance of the use of mechanical devices like AUS. Recently, the male sling has been widely used in mild-to-moderate PPI patients; however, there are no studies that compare individual devices. Thus, it is hard to directly compare the success rate of operation, and it is impossible to judge which sling system is more excellent. It is expected that many sling options will be available in addition to AUS in the near future with the technological development of various male slings and the accumulation of long-term surgical outcomes. In that in patients with PPI, sling implantation is an option that must be explained rather than an option that need not be explained to them, this review would share the latest outcomes and complications.
前列腺切除术后尿失禁(PPI)的管理对泌尿外科医生来说仍然具有挑战性。近几十年来,已经开发并引入了各种男性吊带系统;然而,它们尚未显示出与人工尿道括约肌(AUS)一样好的效果。然而,男性吊带仍然处于重要地位,因为患者对吊带植入有很高的需求,并且它可以避免使用像AUS这样的机械设备。最近,男性吊带已广泛应用于轻至中度PPI患者;然而,尚无比较不同个体装置的研究。因此,很难直接比较手术成功率,也无法判断哪种吊带系统更优。随着各种男性吊带技术的发展以及长期手术结果的积累,预计在不久的将来,除了AUS之外还会有许多吊带可供选择。鉴于在PPI患者中,吊带植入是一个必须向他们解释的选择,而不是一个无需向他们解释的选择,本综述将分享最新的结果和并发症。