Suppr超能文献

男性压力性尿失禁的外科治疗:技术、适应证及成功要点

Surgical Management of Male Stress Incontinence: Techniques, Indications, and Pearls for Success.

作者信息

Smith Wesley J, VanDyke Maia E, Venishetty Nikit, Langford Brian T, Franzen Bryce P, Morey Allen F

机构信息

Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.

出版信息

Res Rep Urol. 2023 Jun 21;15:217-232. doi: 10.2147/RRU.S395359. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Male stress urinary incontinence (SUI) has detrimental and long-lasting effects on patients. Management of this condition is an evolving field with multiple options for surgical treatment. We sought to review the pre-operative evaluation, intra-operative considerations, post-operative care, and future directions for treatment of male SUI.

METHODS

A literature review was performed using the PubMed platform to identify peer-reviewed, English-language articles published within the last 5 years pertaining to management of male stress urinary incontinence with an emphasis on devices currently on the market in the United States including the artificial urinary sphincter (AUS), male urethral slings, and the ProACT system. Patient selection criteria, success rates, and complications were compared between the studies.

RESULTS

Twenty articles were included in the final contemporary review. Pre-operative workup most commonly included demonstration of incontinence, PPD, and cystoscopy. Definition of success varied by study; the most common definition used was social continence (0-1 pads per day). Reported rates of success were higher for the AUS than for male urethral slings (73-93% vs 70-90%, respectively). Complications for these procedures include urinary retention, erosions, infections, and device malfunction. Newer treatment options including adjustable balloon systems and adjustable slings show promise but lack long-term follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Patient selection remains the primary consideration for surgical decision-making for management of male SUI. The AUS continues to be the gold standard for moderate-to-severe male SUI but comes with inherent risk of need for revision. Male slings may be a superior option for appropriately selected men with mild incontinence but are inferior to the AUS for moderate and severe incontinence. Ongoing research will shed light on long-term results for newer options such as the ProACT and REMEEX systems.

摘要

目的

男性压力性尿失禁(SUI)对患者有有害且持久的影响。这种疾病的管理是一个不断发展的领域,有多种手术治疗选择。我们旨在综述男性SUI治疗的术前评估、术中注意事项、术后护理及未来治疗方向。

方法

使用PubMed平台进行文献综述,以识别过去5年发表的关于男性压力性尿失禁管理的同行评审英文文章,重点关注美国目前市场上的设备,包括人工尿道括约肌(AUS)、男性尿道吊带和ProACT系统。比较各研究之间的患者选择标准、成功率和并发症。

结果

最终的当代综述纳入了20篇文章。术前检查最常见的包括尿失禁演示、PPD和膀胱镜检查。成功的定义因研究而异;最常用的定义是社交性控尿(每天0 - 1片尿垫)。AUS报告的成功率高于男性尿道吊带(分别为73 - 93%和70 - 90%)。这些手术的并发症包括尿潴留、侵蚀、感染和设备故障。包括可调节球囊系统和可调节吊带在内的新治疗选择显示出前景,但缺乏长期随访。

结论

患者选择仍然是男性SUI手术决策的主要考虑因素。AUS仍然是中重度男性SUI的金标准,但存在需要翻修的固有风险。男性吊带对于适当选择的轻度尿失禁男性可能是一个更好的选择,但对于中度和重度尿失禁则不如AUS。正在进行的研究将阐明ProACT和REMEEX系统等新选择的长期结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b23/10290851/06dbb098b016/RRU-15-217-g0001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验