Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, MI.
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Oct;12(10):e007939. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.119.007939. Epub 2019 Oct 14.
Invasive fractional flow reserve (FFR) is the standard technique for assessing myocardial ischemia. Pressure distortions and measurement location may influence FFR interpretation. We report a technique for performing invasive fractional flow reserve (FFR) by minimizing pressure distortions and identifying the proper location to measure FFR.
FFR recordings were obtained prospectively during manual hyperemic pullback in 100 normal and diseased coronary arteries with single stenosis, using 4 measurements from the terminal vessel, distal-to-the-lesion, proximal vessel, and guiding catheter. FFR profiles were developed by plotting FFR values (-axis) and site of measurement (-axis), stratified by stenosis severity. FFR≤0.8 was considered positive for lesion-specific ischemia.
Erroneous FFR values were observed in 10% of vessels because of aortic pressure distortion and in 21% because of distal pressure drift; these were corrected by disengagement of the guiding catheter and re-equalization of distal pressure/aortic pressure, respectively. There were significant declines in FFR from the proximal to the terminal vessel in normal and stenotic coronary arteries (<0.001). The rate of positive FFR was 41% when measured from the terminal vessel and 20% when measured distal-to-the-lesion (<0.001); 41.5% of positive terminal measurements were reclassified to negative when measured distal-to-the-lesion. Measuring FFR 20 to 30 mm distal-to-the-lesion (rather than from the terminal vessel) can reduce errors in measurement and optimize the assessment of lesion-specific ischemia.
Meticulous technique (disengagement of the guiding catheter, FFR pullback) is required to avoid erroneous FFR, which occur in 31% of vessels. Even with optimal technique, FFR values are influenced by stenosis severity and the site of pressure measurement. FFR values from the terminal vessel may overestimate lesion-specific ischemia, leading to unnecessary revascularization.
有创性分比流量储备(FFR)是评估心肌缺血的标准技术。压力扭曲和测量位置可能会影响 FFR 的解读。我们报告了一种通过最小化压力扭曲并识别适当的测量位置来进行有创性分比流量储备(FFR)的技术。
前瞻性地在 100 个有单个狭窄的正常和病变冠状动脉中,通过手动充血性回缩获得 FFR 记录,使用来自终末血管、病变远端、近端血管和引导导管的 4 次测量。通过绘制 FFR 值(-轴)和测量位置(-轴)的 FFR 曲线来开发 FFR 曲线,按狭窄严重程度分层。FFR≤0.8 被认为是病变特异性缺血的阳性。
由于主动脉压力扭曲,10%的血管出现错误的 FFR 值,由于远端压力漂移,21%的血管出现错误的 FFR 值;分别通过释放引导导管和重新平衡远端压力/主动脉压力来纠正。在正常和狭窄的冠状动脉中,从近端到终末血管的 FFR 显著下降(<0.001)。从终末血管测量时,FFR 的阳性率为 41%,从病变远端测量时为 20%(<0.001);当从病变远端测量时,41.5%的阳性终末测量重新分类为阴性。从病变远端测量 20 到 30 毫米处的 FFR(而不是从终末血管测量)可以减少测量误差并优化对病变特异性缺血的评估。
需要仔细的技术(释放引导导管,FFR 回缩)来避免错误的 FFR,这在 31%的血管中发生。即使采用最佳技术,FFR 值也受到狭窄严重程度和压力测量位置的影响。从终末血管获得的 FFR 值可能高估病变特异性缺血,导致不必要的血运重建。